Summary
This document includes the populated pre-analysis plan for “Why
Discussion Rules Matter.” The black text is the original, unchanged text
from the pre-analysis plan. Blue text indicates deviations and
precisions.
First group of hypotheses: Institutional Centrality
This measures the degree of de facto centrality (or authority) of
the de jure central official (the Sarpanch) in a typical decision-making
process.
IC1 (H3.1): Oral participation to the meeting will be more
likely for those sarpanches exposed to treatment requiring the sarpanch
to speak (T1 and T2) versus those not exposed (Control).
- Assessed by regressing “equal participation” on treatment status (T1
or T2 versus control). Two-tailed tests are used in all cases.
- We check the robustness of results with bivariate regressions on
treatment status and a multivariate regression including a standard set
of demographic controls. We also control for the potential presence of a
sarpanch relative during the interview (“the interview” being here
understood as the group interview), both separately and in interaction
with the gender of the sarpanch.
- In order to measure equal participation, we make use of the
following two survey items:
- Q29: Does the sarpanch respond first to the question (Y/N)
- Q30: Does the sarpanch speak at all? (Y/N)
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2. We also
include the series of individual and village level controls presented in
G2.
- Deviation 1: Living with in-laws and one’s own
parents were planned to be included in the wealth index. We instead
include them as separate controls, because they are not indicative of
wealth.
- Precision 1: Village-level controls were not
presented in cell G2 of the PAP spreadsheet; instead, they were
presented in cell H4. This was a typo on our part.
| |
DV: Sarpanch responded first |
DV: Sarpanch spoke at all |
IC1 (H3.1) table, grouping T1/T2 together
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.323*** |
0.406*** |
0.313** |
0.802*** |
0.907*** |
0.938*** |
|
(0.034) |
(0.081) |
(0.113) |
(0.029) |
(0.063) |
(0.090) |
| Discussion rules |
0.178*** |
0.138** |
0.134** |
0.055 |
0.039 |
0.036 |
|
(0.042) |
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
(0.034) |
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.286* |
-0.221 |
|
-0.019 |
0.044 |
|
|
(0.126) |
(0.139) |
|
(0.119) |
(0.108) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.367+ |
-0.392* |
|
-0.096 |
-0.122 |
|
|
(0.197) |
(0.193) |
|
(0.200) |
(0.214) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.101 |
-0.035 |
|
0.015 |
0.007 |
|
|
(0.086) |
(0.088) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.074) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.002 |
0.035 |
|
-0.027 |
-0.009 |
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.043) |
| Education above median |
|
0.172*** |
0.176*** |
|
0.079** |
0.073* |
|
|
(0.044) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.031) |
(0.031) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.022 |
-0.015 |
|
0.063* |
0.054+ |
|
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.032) |
(0.032) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
0.090 |
0.070 |
|
-0.080 |
-0.125 |
|
|
(0.110) |
(0.118) |
|
(0.101) |
(0.091) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.076 |
0.077 |
|
-0.057 |
-0.053 |
|
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.038) |
(0.039) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.005 |
0.002 |
|
-0.013 |
-0.012 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.010) |
(0.011) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.011 |
-0.052 |
|
-0.073 |
-0.098 |
|
|
(0.069) |
(0.075) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
| SC quota |
|
0.014 |
-0.050 |
|
-0.052 |
-0.042 |
|
|
(0.085) |
(0.088) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.073) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.048 |
0.010 |
|
0.088* |
0.092* |
|
|
(0.053) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.040) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.218 |
0.165 |
|
-0.090 |
-0.126 |
|
|
(0.210) |
(0.204) |
|
(0.217) |
(0.233) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.087+ |
|
|
0.017 |
|
|
|
(0.045) |
|
|
(0.033) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
| R2 |
0.028 |
0.167 |
0.195 |
0.005 |
0.120 |
0.147 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch responded first |
DV: Sarpanch spoke at all |
IC1 (H3.1) table, T1 versus control
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.323*** |
0.471*** |
0.368** |
0.826*** |
0.844*** |
0.921*** |
|
(0.034) |
(0.090) |
(0.125) |
(0.019) |
(0.068) |
(0.109) |
| T1 |
0.338*** |
0.301*** |
0.310*** |
0.039 |
0.048 |
0.050 |
|
(0.047) |
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
(0.030) |
(0.038) |
(0.039) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.378** |
-0.314* |
|
0.037 |
0.021 |
|
|
(0.130) |
(0.135) |
|
(0.142) |
(0.139) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.671*** |
-0.641*** |
|
-0.303 |
-0.338 |
|
|
(0.142) |
(0.143) |
|
(0.309) |
(0.323) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.214* |
-0.161 |
|
0.011 |
-0.015 |
|
|
(0.101) |
(0.112) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.094) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.065 |
-0.030 |
|
-0.050 |
-0.027 |
|
|
(0.059) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.050) |
| Education above median |
|
0.194*** |
0.178*** |
|
0.121** |
0.098** |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.037) |
(0.037) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.014 |
0.017 |
|
0.067+ |
0.048 |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.040) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
0.146 |
0.143 |
|
-0.113 |
-0.109 |
|
|
(0.108) |
(0.110) |
|
(0.132) |
(0.126) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.087 |
0.109+ |
|
-0.033 |
-0.029 |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.044) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.021 |
-0.018 |
|
0.001 |
-0.000 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.026 |
-0.061 |
|
-0.101 |
-0.093 |
|
|
(0.082) |
(0.086) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.077) |
| SC quota |
|
0.158 |
0.111 |
|
-0.042 |
-0.009 |
|
|
(0.101) |
(0.110) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.092) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.035 |
0.004 |
|
0.086+ |
0.094* |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.047) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.543** |
0.434* |
|
0.172 |
0.134 |
|
|
(0.170) |
(0.169) |
|
(0.324) |
(0.339) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.123* |
|
|
0.042 |
|
|
|
(0.049) |
|
|
(0.039) |
| Num.Obs. |
407 |
370 |
340 |
605 |
370 |
340 |
| R2 |
0.114 |
0.308 |
0.344 |
0.003 |
0.136 |
0.154 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch responded first |
DV: Sarpanch spoke at all |
IC1 (H3.1) table, T2 versus control
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.323*** |
0.340*** |
0.237 |
0.835*** |
0.944*** |
0.876*** |
|
(0.034) |
(0.101) |
(0.144) |
(0.018) |
(0.084) |
(0.118) |
| T2 |
0.005 |
-0.040 |
-0.047 |
0.013 |
0.014 |
0.015 |
|
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
(0.031) |
(0.039) |
(0.041) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.256 |
-0.209 |
|
-0.074 |
0.087 |
|
|
(0.165) |
(0.189) |
|
(0.177) |
(0.166) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.198 |
-0.229 |
|
-0.116 |
-0.126 |
|
|
(0.274) |
(0.272) |
|
(0.264) |
(0.282) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.082 |
-0.013 |
|
-0.039 |
-0.012 |
|
|
(0.100) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.109) |
(0.106) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.009 |
0.021 |
|
-0.038 |
-0.006 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.059) |
| Education above median |
|
0.165** |
0.184** |
|
0.050 |
0.060 |
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.049 |
-0.045 |
|
0.064 |
0.063 |
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.041) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
0.050 |
0.062 |
|
-0.095 |
-0.168 |
|
|
(0.151) |
(0.164) |
|
(0.142) |
(0.135) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.118+ |
0.094 |
|
-0.052 |
-0.049 |
|
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.001 |
0.002 |
|
-0.022 |
-0.019 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.016) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.061 |
0.002 |
|
-0.006 |
-0.104 |
|
|
(0.078) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.099) |
| SC quota |
|
0.020 |
-0.048 |
|
0.019 |
0.000 |
|
|
(0.098) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.108) |
(0.105) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.077 |
0.044 |
|
0.122* |
0.128* |
|
|
(0.065) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.053) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.082 |
0.047 |
|
-0.151 |
-0.183 |
|
|
(0.281) |
(0.274) |
|
(0.286) |
(0.303) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.125* |
|
|
0.012 |
|
|
|
(0.055) |
|
|
(0.045) |
| Num.Obs. |
390 |
351 |
325 |
605 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.000 |
0.136 |
0.169 |
0.000 |
0.127 |
0.158 |
IC2 (H3.2): Institutional centrality of the sarpanch will be
higher for those exposed to treatment requiring the sarpanch to speak
(T1 and T2) versus not exposed (Control).
- We focus on differences in (i) means and (ii) the graphical
distribution of values across treatment (clubbing T1 and T2 together)
and control conditions for each dependent variable, with respect to our
measures of institutional centrality (both perceptions and
behaviors).
- We also control for the potential presence of a sarpanch relative
during the interview (“the interview” being here understood as the group
interview), both separately and in interaction with the gender of the
sarpanch. Cluster-corrected standard errors will be used at the taluka
level. We check the robustness of results with bivariate regressions on
treatment status and a multivariate regression including a standard set
of demographic controls.
- We draw on our group survey instrument to develop three primary
measures of institutional centrality (IC), below. We include additional
measures of IC in the Supplemental Appendix.
- Q35: “Who made the final decision?” (for the budget - enumerator
codes, 1: sarpanch)
- Q39: Responded first to the question: What are the roles and
responsibilities of the sarpanch? Which are most important to you?
(1=Yes/0=anything else)
- Q91: “For what approximate percentage of the discussion did the
sarpanch speak?” (0-100%, normalized to 0-1 scale)
- In additional analyses, we disentangle the impact of T1 and T2. We
also run bivariate regressions, clustering at the taluka level, and we
also include the series of individual and village level demographic
controls presented in G2.
- Deviation 1: Living with in-laws and one’s own
parents were planned to be included in the wealth index. We instead
include them as separate controls, because they are not indicative of
wealth.
- Deviation 2: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Deviation 3: Because the first two variables are
binary, comparing graphical distributions is not more informative than
running regressions. However, we do still compare graphical
distributions between treatment/control for the third outcome variable.
- Precision 1: Village-level controls were not
presented in cell G2 of the PAP spreadsheet; instead, they were
presented in cell H4. This was a typo on our part.
- Precision 2: We previously did not state how we
would formally test whether the distributions of outcome variables under
each treatment condition are statistically different from each other. We
do so here using an asymptotic two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov
test.
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC2 (H3.2) table, grouping T1/T2 together
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.193*** |
0.345*** |
0.472*** |
0.786*** |
0.804*** |
0.727*** |
0.256*** |
0.279*** |
0.299*** |
|
(0.029) |
(0.077) |
(0.107) |
(0.030) |
(0.069) |
(0.093) |
(0.011) |
(0.024) |
(0.035) |
| Discussion rules |
0.122*** |
0.094* |
0.101* |
0.022 |
-0.001 |
-0.014 |
0.034* |
0.015 |
0.015 |
|
(0.037) |
(0.038) |
(0.040) |
(0.035) |
(0.037) |
(0.036) |
(0.014) |
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.141 |
-0.106 |
|
-0.095 |
-0.029 |
|
-0.100** |
-0.072+ |
|
|
(0.119) |
(0.135) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.127) |
|
(0.038) |
(0.040) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.001 |
-0.028 |
|
0.145*** |
0.126* |
|
0.025 |
0.013 |
|
|
(0.227) |
(0.232) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.126) |
(0.126) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.168+ |
-0.180+ |
|
-0.039 |
0.009 |
|
0.016 |
0.025 |
|
|
(0.095) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.022) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.055 |
-0.047 |
|
0.017 |
0.073 |
|
0.008 |
0.019 |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Education above median |
|
0.106** |
0.121** |
|
0.122*** |
0.129*** |
|
0.081*** |
0.079*** |
|
|
(0.040) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.023 |
-0.026 |
|
0.023 |
0.006 |
|
0.011 |
0.010 |
|
|
(0.038) |
(0.039) |
|
(0.036) |
(0.037) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.109 |
-0.120 |
|
0.087 |
0.031 |
|
-0.006 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.107) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.118) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.036) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.017 |
-0.041 |
|
0.012 |
0.003 |
|
0.026+ |
0.023 |
|
|
(0.042) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.006 |
0.009 |
|
-0.015 |
-0.009 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
|
(0.004) |
(0.004) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.006 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.110+ |
-0.156* |
|
-0.018 |
-0.037+ |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| SC quota |
|
0.115 |
0.122 |
|
0.079 |
0.051 |
|
-0.041* |
-0.048* |
|
|
(0.093) |
(0.096) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.022) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.029 |
0.010 |
|
0.042 |
0.020 |
|
0.001 |
-0.007 |
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.016) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.051 |
-0.030 |
|
-0.308** |
-0.309** |
|
-0.103 |
-0.104 |
|
|
(0.234) |
(0.240) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.128) |
(0.128) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
0.002* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
0.008 |
|
|
0.026* |
|
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.036) |
|
|
(0.013) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
604 |
548 |
505 |
| R2 |
0.016 |
0.119 |
0.128 |
0.001 |
0.087 |
0.119 |
0.010 |
0.366 |
0.376 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC2 (H3.2) table, comparing T1 to control
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.193*** |
0.364*** |
0.445*** |
0.786*** |
0.795*** |
0.821*** |
0.256*** |
0.302*** |
0.332*** |
|
(0.029) |
(0.084) |
(0.122) |
(0.030) |
(0.081) |
(0.104) |
(0.011) |
(0.029) |
(0.042) |
| T1 |
0.063 |
0.044 |
0.045 |
0.051 |
0.033 |
0.017 |
0.036* |
|
0.015 |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
(0.046) |
(0.039) |
(0.040) |
(0.039) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.014) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.011 |
-0.020 |
|
0.036 |
0.052 |
|
-0.116** |
-0.098** |
|
|
(0.128) |
(0.138) |
|
(0.135) |
(0.124) |
|
(0.038) |
(0.037) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.079 |
-0.140 |
|
0.091 |
0.017 |
|
-0.120 |
-0.127 |
|
|
(0.273) |
(0.287) |
|
(0.064) |
(0.091) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.104) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.147 |
-0.155 |
|
-0.010 |
0.026 |
|
-0.008 |
-0.005 |
|
|
(0.097) |
(0.102) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.027) |
(0.030) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.067 |
-0.058 |
|
0.043 |
0.083 |
|
-0.000 |
0.009 |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.020) |
| Education above median |
|
0.120** |
0.121* |
|
0.129** |
0.126** |
|
0.101*** |
0.097*** |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.015) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.034 |
-0.024 |
|
0.011 |
-0.002 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.217+ |
-0.209+ |
|
-0.071 |
-0.078 |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.114) |
(0.122) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.032) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.070 |
-0.087+ |
|
-0.042 |
-0.052 |
|
0.003 |
-0.001 |
|
|
(0.048) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.016 |
0.022 |
|
-0.007 |
-0.004 |
|
0.006 |
0.005 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.057 |
-0.038 |
|
-0.099 |
-0.154* |
|
-0.030 |
-0.043* |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.068) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.022) |
| SC quota |
|
0.051 |
0.052 |
|
0.121 |
0.100 |
|
-0.026 |
-0.029 |
|
|
(0.094) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.086) |
(0.088) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.072 |
0.056 |
|
0.030 |
0.028 |
|
0.001 |
-0.009 |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.035 |
0.078 |
|
-0.253* |
-0.202 |
|
0.040 |
0.031 |
|
|
(0.281) |
(0.295) |
|
(0.125) |
(0.142) |
|
(0.104) |
(0.107) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
0.004* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.011 |
|
|
0.024 |
|
|
0.024 |
|
|
|
(0.049) |
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| treatment_1_2_together |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.014) |
|
| Num.Obs. |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
369 |
339 |
| R2 |
0.006 |
0.141 |
0.141 |
0.004 |
0.097 |
0.148 |
0.013 |
0.396 |
0.398 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC2 (H3.2) table, comparing T2 to control
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.193*** |
0.313** |
0.530*** |
0.786*** |
0.819*** |
0.740*** |
0.256*** |
0.256*** |
0.281*** |
|
(0.029) |
(0.096) |
(0.133) |
(0.030) |
(0.089) |
(0.126) |
(0.011) |
(0.031) |
(0.048) |
| T2 |
0.186*** |
0.140** |
0.152** |
-0.009 |
-0.040 |
-0.056 |
0.031* |
0.012 |
0.012 |
|
(0.045) |
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
(0.044) |
(0.016) |
(0.015) |
(0.015) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.215 |
-0.144 |
|
-0.187 |
-0.132 |
|
-0.098+ |
-0.066 |
|
|
(0.157) |
(0.190) |
|
(0.158) |
(0.166) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.136 |
-0.147 |
|
0.190** |
0.147+ |
|
0.001 |
-0.016 |
|
|
(0.254) |
(0.259) |
|
(0.070) |
(0.086) |
|
(0.166) |
(0.161) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.175 |
-0.182 |
|
-0.006 |
0.041 |
|
0.026 |
0.040 |
|
|
(0.131) |
(0.131) |
|
(0.101) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.025) |
(0.026) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.051 |
-0.059 |
|
-0.021 |
0.057 |
|
0.008 |
0.018 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.020) |
| Education above median |
|
0.123* |
0.153** |
|
0.144** |
0.163*** |
|
0.071*** |
0.068*** |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.010 |
-0.012 |
|
-0.000 |
-0.022 |
|
0.015 |
0.012 |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.003 |
-0.027 |
|
0.130 |
0.075 |
|
-0.013 |
-0.025 |
|
|
(0.142) |
(0.168) |
|
(0.132) |
(0.138) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.056) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.002 |
-0.031 |
|
0.027 |
0.010 |
|
0.048** |
0.042* |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.017) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.001 |
-0.002 |
|
-0.026 |
-0.020 |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.004 |
-0.056 |
|
-0.034 |
-0.080 |
|
0.003 |
-0.020 |
|
|
(0.078) |
(0.091) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.096) |
|
(0.022) |
(0.023) |
| SC quota |
|
0.171 |
0.152 |
|
0.029 |
0.015 |
|
-0.032 |
-0.047+ |
|
|
(0.132) |
(0.132) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.000 |
-0.028 |
|
0.097 |
0.064 |
|
0.011 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.110 |
0.126 |
|
-0.329* |
-0.305* |
|
-0.073 |
-0.064 |
|
|
(0.266) |
(0.271) |
|
(0.136) |
(0.148) |
|
(0.167) |
(0.163) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.003* |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.008 |
|
|
0.030 |
|
|
0.031+ |
|
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.042 |
0.135 |
0.159 |
0.000 |
0.093 |
0.129 |
0.010 |
0.366 |
0.376 |


##
## Asymptotic two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
##
## data: df$proportion_time_spoken[df$treatment_1_2_together == 1] and df$proportion_time_spoken[df$treatment_1_2_together == 0]
## D = 0.11625, p-value = 0.05803
## alternative hypothesis: two-sided
IC3 (H3.3): Assignment to any treatment (T1 or T2, considered
jointly) will improve institutional centrality at a higher rate if the
sarpanch is from a disadvantaged group.
- IC3 is assessed by regressing our primary measures of centrality (as
specified immediately above in IC2) on a binary indicator of treatment
(bundling T1 and T2 versus control), an indicator of the relevant
dimension of disadvantage (including one regression using the index of
disadvantage) and the multiplicative interaction between the two. For
each of our 3 dependent variables, we run a regression interacting
treatment status with indicators of the sarpanch’s gender and caste, as
defined above. We also consider the alternate measures of disadvantage
defined above. Our focus is on the interaction effects for each of these
specifications. Cluster-corrected standard errors will be used at the
administrative block level. We check the robustness of results with
bivariate regressions on treatment status and a multivariate regression
including a standard set of demographic controls. We also control for
the potential presence of a sarpanch relative during the interview (“the
interview” being here understood as the group interview), both
separately and in interaction with the gender of the sarpanch.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle the impact of T1 and T2. We
also run bivariate regressions, clustering at the taluka level, and we
also include the series of individual and village level demographic
controls presented in G2.
- Deviation 1: Living with in-laws and one’s own
parents were planned to be included in the wealth index. We instead
include them as separate controls, because they are not indicative of
wealth.
- Deviation 2: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Precision 1: Village-level controls were not
presented in cell G2 of the PAP spreadsheet; instead, they were
presented in cell H4. This was a typo on our part.
- Precision 2: We construct the index of
disadvantage via all mentioned variables indicating disadvantage. We
create an additive variable of disadvantage.
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, grouping T1/T2 together, Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.333*** |
0.323*** |
0.435*** |
0.841*** |
0.762*** |
0.705*** |
0.354*** |
0.283*** |
0.304*** |
|
(0.057) |
(0.090) |
(0.119) |
(0.044) |
(0.076) |
(0.097) |
(0.019) |
(0.029) |
(0.040) |
| Discussion rules |
0.132+ |
0.123+ |
0.144+ |
0.057 |
0.053 |
0.012 |
0.022 |
0.010 |
0.009 |
|
(0.068) |
(0.072) |
(0.073) |
(0.050) |
(0.051) |
(0.044) |
(0.022) |
(0.023) |
(0.023) |
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.220*** |
-0.108 |
-0.058 |
-0.084 |
-0.032 |
-0.000 |
-0.153*** |
-0.105* |
-0.079+ |
|
(0.064) |
(0.133) |
(0.147) |
(0.059) |
(0.137) |
(0.132) |
(0.022) |
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
-0.052 |
-0.046 |
-0.069 |
-0.076 |
-0.089 |
-0.042 |
-0.003 |
0.008 |
0.010 |
|
(0.078) |
(0.084) |
(0.087) |
(0.070) |
(0.072) |
(0.069) |
(0.026) |
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.002 |
-0.021 |
|
0.152*** |
0.130* |
|
0.025 |
0.012 |
|
|
(0.224) |
(0.227) |
|
(0.037) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.127) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.170+ |
-0.181+ |
|
-0.041 |
0.009 |
|
0.016 |
0.025 |
|
|
(0.095) |
(0.099) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.022) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.054 |
-0.047 |
|
0.017 |
0.074 |
|
0.008 |
0.019 |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Education above median |
|
0.106** |
0.121** |
|
0.122*** |
0.129*** |
|
0.081*** |
0.079*** |
|
|
(0.040) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.025 |
-0.027 |
|
0.020 |
0.005 |
|
0.011 |
0.010 |
|
|
(0.038) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.036) |
(0.037) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.109 |
-0.119 |
|
0.088 |
0.032 |
|
-0.006 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.107) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.117) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.036) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.017 |
-0.041 |
|
0.013 |
0.003 |
|
0.026+ |
0.023 |
|
|
(0.042) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.006 |
0.009 |
|
-0.015 |
-0.009 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
|
(0.004) |
(0.004) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.006 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.111+ |
-0.156* |
|
-0.018 |
-0.037+ |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| SC quota |
|
0.118 |
0.125 |
|
0.084 |
0.053 |
|
-0.041* |
-0.049* |
|
|
(0.094) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.022) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.031 |
0.011 |
|
0.045 |
0.020 |
|
0.000 |
-0.008 |
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.016) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.055 |
-0.037 |
|
-0.316** |
-0.314** |
|
-0.103 |
-0.103 |
|
|
(0.231) |
(0.235) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.129) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.002* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
0.008 |
|
|
0.026* |
|
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.036) |
|
|
(0.013) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
604 |
548 |
505 |
| R2 |
0.096 |
0.119 |
0.129 |
0.031 |
0.089 |
0.119 |
0.242 |
0.366 |
0.376 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, comparing T1 to control, Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.333*** |
0.341*** |
0.411** |
0.841*** |
0.760*** |
0.806*** |
0.354*** |
0.302*** |
0.337*** |
|
(0.057) |
(0.095) |
(0.134) |
(0.044) |
(0.085) |
(0.108) |
(0.019) |
(0.032) |
(0.046) |
| T1 |
0.073 |
0.077 |
0.088 |
0.093+ |
0.084 |
0.035 |
0.034 |
0.012 |
0.009 |
|
(0.077) |
(0.080) |
(0.082) |
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
(0.048) |
(0.025) |
(0.025) |
(0.025) |
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.220*** |
0.022 |
0.021 |
-0.084 |
0.085 |
0.070 |
-0.153*** |
-0.117** |
-0.103* |
|
(0.064) |
(0.143) |
(0.154) |
(0.059) |
(0.140) |
(0.129) |
(0.022) |
(0.042) |
(0.040) |
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
-0.042 |
-0.056 |
-0.071 |
-0.083 |
-0.085 |
-0.031 |
-0.013 |
0.002 |
0.009 |
|
(0.088) |
(0.095) |
(0.099) |
(0.075) |
(0.079) |
(0.076) |
(0.030) |
(0.030) |
(0.031) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.071 |
-0.127 |
|
0.104 |
0.023 |
|
-0.120 |
-0.128 |
|
|
(0.266) |
(0.278) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.106) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.149 |
-0.155 |
|
-0.013 |
0.026 |
|
-0.008 |
-0.005 |
|
|
(0.098) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.090) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.027) |
(0.030) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.066 |
-0.057 |
|
0.044 |
0.084 |
|
-0.000 |
0.009 |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Education above median |
|
0.121** |
0.121* |
|
0.131** |
0.127** |
|
0.101*** |
0.097*** |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.015) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.036 |
-0.026 |
|
0.008 |
-0.003 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.043) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.217+ |
-0.208+ |
|
-0.070 |
-0.078 |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.114) |
(0.123) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.032) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.069 |
-0.086 |
|
-0.040 |
-0.051 |
|
0.003 |
-0.001 |
|
|
(0.048) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.017 |
0.022 |
|
-0.007 |
-0.004 |
|
0.006 |
0.005 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.059 |
-0.040 |
|
-0.103 |
-0.155* |
|
-0.030 |
-0.043* |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.066) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.021) |
| SC quota |
|
0.056 |
0.057 |
|
0.128 |
0.102 |
|
-0.027 |
-0.029 |
|
|
(0.095) |
(0.099) |
|
(0.085) |
(0.088) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.074 |
0.059 |
|
0.033 |
0.029 |
|
0.001 |
-0.009 |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.028 |
0.067 |
|
-0.264* |
-0.207 |
|
0.040 |
0.032 |
|
|
(0.274) |
(0.286) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.142) |
|
(0.105) |
(0.109) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.003 |
|
|
0.004* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.011 |
|
|
0.025 |
|
|
0.023 |
|
|
|
(0.049) |
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
369 |
339 |
| R2 |
0.086 |
0.142 |
0.143 |
0.033 |
0.100 |
0.148 |
0.251 |
0.396 |
0.398 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, comparing T2 to control, Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.333*** |
0.303** |
0.504*** |
0.841*** |
0.782*** |
0.715*** |
0.354*** |
0.262*** |
0.288*** |
|
(0.057) |
(0.103) |
(0.141) |
(0.044) |
(0.094) |
(0.129) |
(0.019) |
(0.034) |
(0.051) |
| t2 |
0.188* |
0.157+ |
0.189* |
0.021 |
0.024 |
-0.019 |
0.010 |
0.003 |
0.002 |
|
(0.077) |
(0.083) |
(0.084) |
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
(0.052) |
(0.024) |
(0.025) |
(0.026) |
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.220*** |
-0.201 |
-0.115 |
-0.084 |
-0.131 |
-0.103 |
-0.153*** |
-0.106+ |
-0.075 |
|
(0.064) |
(0.165) |
(0.193) |
(0.059) |
(0.158) |
(0.164) |
(0.022) |
(0.056) |
(0.060) |
| t2:Sarpanch woman |
-0.052 |
-0.029 |
-0.062 |
-0.075 |
-0.110 |
-0.062 |
0.007 |
0.016 |
0.018 |
|
(0.093) |
(0.100) |
(0.102) |
(0.082) |
(0.085) |
(0.083) |
(0.030) |
(0.030) |
(0.031) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.135 |
-0.143 |
|
0.193** |
0.150+ |
|
0.000 |
-0.016 |
|
|
(0.253) |
(0.255) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.168) |
(0.164) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.176 |
-0.184 |
|
-0.011 |
0.039 |
|
0.027 |
0.040 |
|
|
(0.132) |
(0.132) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.025) |
(0.026) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.051 |
-0.058 |
|
-0.020 |
0.057 |
|
0.008 |
0.018 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.070) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Education above median |
|
0.123* |
0.153** |
|
0.143** |
0.162*** |
|
0.071*** |
0.069*** |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.010 |
-0.014 |
|
-0.003 |
-0.024 |
|
0.015 |
0.013 |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.003 |
-0.025 |
|
0.131 |
0.077 |
|
-0.013 |
-0.025 |
|
|
(0.141) |
(0.166) |
|
(0.128) |
(0.136) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.056) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.002 |
-0.031 |
|
0.027 |
0.010 |
|
0.048** |
0.043* |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.017) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.001 |
-0.002 |
|
-0.026 |
-0.020 |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.005 |
-0.053 |
|
-0.032 |
-0.077 |
|
0.002 |
-0.020 |
|
|
(0.078) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.096) |
|
(0.022) |
(0.023) |
| SC quota |
|
0.172 |
0.155 |
|
0.036 |
0.019 |
|
-0.033 |
-0.048+ |
|
|
(0.133) |
(0.134) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.000 |
-0.028 |
|
0.100 |
0.065 |
|
0.010 |
0.001 |
|
|
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.070) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.108 |
0.122 |
|
-0.335* |
-0.310* |
|
-0.072 |
-0.062 |
|
|
(0.265) |
(0.267) |
|
(0.131) |
(0.145) |
|
(0.170) |
(0.166) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.003* |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.007 |
|
|
0.029 |
|
|
0.031+ |
|
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.114 |
0.136 |
0.160 |
0.024 |
0.097 |
0.130 |
0.231 |
0.366 |
0.377 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, grouping T1/T2 together, Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.203*** |
0.336*** |
0.468*** |
0.752*** |
0.779*** |
0.696*** |
0.261*** |
0.275*** |
0.295*** |
|
(0.035) |
(0.078) |
(0.108) |
(0.038) |
(0.071) |
(0.096) |
(0.014) |
(0.025) |
(0.036) |
| Discussion rules |
0.133** |
0.108* |
0.107* |
0.062 |
0.035 |
0.025 |
0.041* |
0.021 |
0.020 |
|
(0.045) |
(0.045) |
(0.048) |
(0.044) |
(0.044) |
(0.044) |
(0.018) |
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
| Sarpanch SC |
-0.034 |
-0.133 |
-0.167 |
0.113+ |
0.052 |
0.104 |
-0.017 |
0.032 |
0.035 |
|
(0.060) |
(0.104) |
(0.107) |
(0.059) |
(0.090) |
(0.089) |
(0.022) |
(0.027) |
(0.028) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch SC |
-0.025 |
-0.050 |
-0.019 |
-0.131+ |
-0.129+ |
-0.135+ |
-0.017 |
-0.023 |
-0.015 |
|
(0.077) |
(0.082) |
(0.084) |
(0.072) |
(0.077) |
(0.075) |
(0.027) |
(0.025) |
(0.026) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.141 |
-0.107 |
|
-0.096 |
-0.032 |
|
-0.100** |
-0.072+ |
|
|
(0.118) |
(0.134) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.127) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.040) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.004 |
-0.029 |
|
0.137** |
0.120+ |
|
0.024 |
0.012 |
|
|
(0.227) |
(0.232) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.126) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.055 |
-0.047 |
|
0.017 |
0.074 |
|
0.008 |
0.019 |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Education above median |
|
0.105** |
0.121** |
|
0.121*** |
0.128*** |
|
0.081*** |
0.079*** |
|
|
(0.040) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.023 |
-0.026 |
|
0.022 |
0.003 |
|
0.011 |
0.010 |
|
|
(0.038) |
(0.039) |
|
(0.036) |
(0.037) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.109 |
-0.120 |
|
0.088 |
0.031 |
|
-0.006 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.107) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.117) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.036) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.018 |
-0.041 |
|
0.012 |
0.002 |
|
0.026+ |
0.023 |
|
|
(0.042) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.039) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.006 |
0.009 |
|
-0.015 |
-0.009 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
|
(0.004) |
(0.004) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.007 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.109+ |
-0.153* |
|
-0.018 |
-0.036+ |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| SC quota |
|
0.115 |
0.122 |
|
0.077 |
0.049 |
|
-0.041* |
-0.048* |
|
|
(0.093) |
(0.096) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.022) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.028 |
0.009 |
|
0.039 |
0.016 |
|
0.000 |
-0.008 |
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.016) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.046 |
-0.028 |
|
-0.295** |
-0.295* |
|
-0.101 |
-0.102 |
|
|
(0.234) |
(0.240) |
|
(0.104) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.128) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
0.003* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
0.006 |
|
|
0.026* |
|
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.036) |
|
|
(0.013) |
| Num.Obs. |
603 |
549 |
506 |
603 |
549 |
506 |
602 |
548 |
505 |
| R2 |
0.020 |
0.119 |
0.128 |
0.006 |
0.091 |
0.124 |
0.018 |
0.366 |
0.376 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, comparing T1 to control, Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.203*** |
0.340*** |
0.420*** |
0.752*** |
0.783*** |
0.809*** |
0.261*** |
0.295*** |
0.325*** |
|
(0.035) |
(0.084) |
(0.123) |
(0.038) |
(0.083) |
(0.108) |
(0.014) |
(0.029) |
(0.043) |
| T1 |
0.108* |
0.086+ |
0.081 |
0.072 |
0.055 |
0.035 |
0.049* |
0.026 |
0.026 |
|
(0.052) |
(0.051) |
(0.055) |
(0.049) |
(0.048) |
(0.048) |
(0.020) |
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
| Sarpanch SC |
-0.034 |
-0.056 |
-0.080 |
0.113+ |
0.037 |
0.065 |
-0.017 |
0.020 |
0.019 |
|
(0.060) |
(0.107) |
(0.111) |
(0.059) |
(0.100) |
(0.103) |
(0.022) |
(0.030) |
(0.033) |
| T1:Sarpanch SC |
-0.141+ |
-0.154+ |
-0.127 |
-0.073 |
-0.080 |
-0.067 |
-0.036 |
-0.048+ |
-0.041 |
|
(0.083) |
(0.091) |
(0.095) |
(0.079) |
(0.085) |
(0.082) |
(0.031) |
(0.027) |
(0.028) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.003 |
-0.016 |
|
0.040 |
0.054 |
|
-0.113** |
-0.096* |
|
|
(0.125) |
(0.136) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.124) |
|
(0.040) |
(0.039) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.097 |
-0.151 |
|
0.082 |
0.012 |
|
-0.126 |
-0.130 |
|
|
(0.273) |
(0.286) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.104) |
(0.107) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.067 |
-0.057 |
|
0.043 |
0.084 |
|
-0.000 |
0.009 |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.020) |
| Education above median |
|
0.119** |
0.121* |
|
0.129** |
0.126** |
|
0.101*** |
0.097*** |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.015) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.034 |
-0.026 |
|
0.011 |
-0.003 |
|
0.005 |
0.003 |
|
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.218* |
-0.209+ |
|
-0.071 |
-0.078 |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.111) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.125) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.037) |
(0.034) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.072 |
-0.090+ |
|
-0.043 |
-0.053 |
|
0.002 |
-0.002 |
|
|
(0.048) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.017 |
0.023 |
|
-0.007 |
-0.004 |
|
0.006 |
0.006 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.063 |
-0.041 |
|
-0.103 |
-0.156* |
|
-0.032 |
-0.044* |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.066) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.021) |
| SC quota |
|
0.040 |
0.043 |
|
0.115 |
0.095 |
|
-0.030 |
-0.032 |
|
|
(0.094) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.084) |
(0.087) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.068 |
0.052 |
|
0.028 |
0.026 |
|
-0.000 |
-0.010 |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.057 |
0.094 |
|
-0.242+ |
-0.194 |
|
0.047 |
0.036 |
|
|
(0.281) |
(0.295) |
|
(0.132) |
(0.150) |
|
(0.107) |
(0.109) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
0.004* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.009 |
|
|
0.024 |
|
|
0.023 |
|
|
|
(0.049) |
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
406 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
405 |
369 |
339 |
| R2 |
0.026 |
0.148 |
0.145 |
0.014 |
0.099 |
0.149 |
0.027 |
0.400 |
0.401 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, comparing T2 to control, Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.203*** |
0.316** |
0.544*** |
0.752*** |
0.791*** |
0.701*** |
0.261*** |
0.256*** |
0.282*** |
|
(0.035) |
(0.097) |
(0.135) |
(0.038) |
(0.090) |
(0.127) |
(0.014) |
(0.032) |
(0.049) |
| t2 |
0.162** |
0.134* |
0.132* |
0.050 |
0.011 |
-0.001 |
0.032 |
0.013 |
0.010 |
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
(0.052) |
(0.052) |
(0.053) |
(0.020) |
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Sarpanch SC |
-0.034 |
-0.185 |
-0.213 |
0.113+ |
0.076 |
0.127 |
-0.017 |
0.027 |
0.037 |
|
(0.060) |
(0.130) |
(0.130) |
(0.059) |
(0.109) |
(0.108) |
(0.022) |
(0.029) |
(0.031) |
| t2:Sarpanch SC |
0.077 |
0.022 |
0.065 |
-0.182* |
-0.173+ |
-0.182* |
0.002 |
-0.003 |
0.006 |
|
(0.095) |
(0.101) |
(0.104) |
(0.087) |
(0.092) |
(0.092) |
(0.031) |
(0.029) |
(0.030) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.213 |
-0.139 |
|
-0.201 |
-0.146 |
|
-0.098+ |
-0.066 |
|
|
(0.157) |
(0.193) |
|
(0.158) |
(0.164) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.135 |
-0.145 |
|
0.185* |
0.144 |
|
0.001 |
-0.015 |
|
|
(0.256) |
(0.262) |
|
(0.088) |
(0.109) |
|
(0.166) |
(0.161) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.051 |
-0.060 |
|
-0.019 |
0.059 |
|
0.008 |
0.018 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Education above median |
|
0.123* |
0.154** |
|
0.144** |
0.163*** |
|
0.071*** |
0.069*** |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.009 |
-0.011 |
|
-0.002 |
-0.028 |
|
0.015 |
0.012 |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.003 |
-0.027 |
|
0.133 |
0.076 |
|
-0.013 |
-0.025 |
|
|
(0.143) |
(0.171) |
|
(0.131) |
(0.136) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.056) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.002 |
-0.031 |
|
0.028 |
0.011 |
|
0.048** |
0.042* |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.017) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.001 |
-0.002 |
|
-0.024 |
-0.019 |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.003 |
-0.061 |
|
-0.022 |
-0.065 |
|
0.003 |
-0.020 |
|
|
(0.078) |
(0.091) |
|
(0.090) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.022) |
(0.023) |
| SC quota |
|
0.169 |
0.148 |
|
0.040 |
0.028 |
|
-0.032 |
-0.048+ |
|
|
(0.133) |
(0.133) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.000 |
-0.026 |
|
0.091 |
0.057 |
|
0.010 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.065) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.107 |
0.118 |
|
-0.310* |
-0.283+ |
|
-0.073 |
-0.064 |
|
|
(0.267) |
(0.274) |
|
(0.146) |
(0.163) |
|
(0.167) |
(0.162) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.003* |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.010 |
|
|
0.024 |
|
|
0.031+ |
|
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.045 |
0.135 |
0.160 |
0.011 |
0.102 |
0.139 |
0.013 |
0.366 |
0.376 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, grouping T1/T2 together, Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.333*** |
0.323*** |
0.435*** |
0.841*** |
0.762*** |
0.705*** |
0.354*** |
0.283*** |
0.304*** |
|
(0.057) |
(0.090) |
(0.119) |
(0.044) |
(0.076) |
(0.097) |
(0.019) |
(0.029) |
(0.040) |
| Discussion rules |
0.132+ |
0.123+ |
0.144+ |
0.057 |
0.053 |
0.012 |
0.022 |
0.010 |
0.009 |
|
(0.068) |
(0.072) |
(0.073) |
(0.050) |
(0.051) |
(0.044) |
(0.022) |
(0.023) |
(0.023) |
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.220*** |
-0.108 |
-0.058 |
-0.084 |
-0.032 |
-0.000 |
-0.153*** |
-0.105* |
-0.079+ |
|
(0.064) |
(0.133) |
(0.147) |
(0.059) |
(0.137) |
(0.132) |
(0.022) |
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
-0.052 |
-0.046 |
-0.069 |
-0.076 |
-0.089 |
-0.042 |
-0.003 |
0.008 |
0.010 |
|
(0.078) |
(0.084) |
(0.087) |
(0.070) |
(0.072) |
(0.069) |
(0.026) |
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.002 |
-0.021 |
|
0.152*** |
0.130* |
|
0.025 |
0.012 |
|
|
(0.224) |
(0.227) |
|
(0.037) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.127) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.170+ |
-0.181+ |
|
-0.041 |
0.009 |
|
0.016 |
0.025 |
|
|
(0.095) |
(0.099) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.022) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.054 |
-0.047 |
|
0.017 |
0.074 |
|
0.008 |
0.019 |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Education above median |
|
0.106** |
0.121** |
|
0.122*** |
0.129*** |
|
0.081*** |
0.079*** |
|
|
(0.040) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.025 |
-0.027 |
|
0.020 |
0.005 |
|
0.011 |
0.010 |
|
|
(0.038) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.036) |
(0.037) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.109 |
-0.119 |
|
0.088 |
0.032 |
|
-0.006 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.107) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.117) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.036) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.017 |
-0.041 |
|
0.013 |
0.003 |
|
0.026+ |
0.023 |
|
|
(0.042) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.006 |
0.009 |
|
-0.015 |
-0.009 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
|
(0.004) |
(0.004) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.006 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.111+ |
-0.156* |
|
-0.018 |
-0.037+ |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| SC quota |
|
0.118 |
0.125 |
|
0.084 |
0.053 |
|
-0.041* |
-0.049* |
|
|
(0.094) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.022) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.031 |
0.011 |
|
0.045 |
0.020 |
|
0.000 |
-0.008 |
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.016) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.055 |
-0.037 |
|
-0.316** |
-0.314** |
|
-0.103 |
-0.103 |
|
|
(0.231) |
(0.235) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.129) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.002* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
0.008 |
|
|
0.026* |
|
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.036) |
|
|
(0.013) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
604 |
548 |
505 |
| R2 |
0.096 |
0.119 |
0.129 |
0.031 |
0.089 |
0.119 |
0.242 |
0.366 |
0.376 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, comparing T1 to control, Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.333*** |
0.341*** |
0.411** |
0.841*** |
0.760*** |
0.806*** |
0.354*** |
0.302*** |
0.337*** |
|
(0.057) |
(0.095) |
(0.134) |
(0.044) |
(0.085) |
(0.108) |
(0.019) |
(0.032) |
(0.046) |
| T1 |
0.073 |
0.077 |
0.088 |
0.093+ |
0.084 |
0.035 |
0.034 |
0.012 |
0.009 |
|
(0.077) |
(0.080) |
(0.082) |
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
(0.048) |
(0.025) |
(0.025) |
(0.025) |
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.220*** |
0.022 |
0.021 |
-0.084 |
0.085 |
0.070 |
-0.153*** |
-0.117** |
-0.103* |
|
(0.064) |
(0.143) |
(0.154) |
(0.059) |
(0.140) |
(0.129) |
(0.022) |
(0.042) |
(0.040) |
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
-0.042 |
-0.056 |
-0.071 |
-0.083 |
-0.085 |
-0.031 |
-0.013 |
0.002 |
0.009 |
|
(0.088) |
(0.095) |
(0.099) |
(0.075) |
(0.079) |
(0.076) |
(0.030) |
(0.030) |
(0.031) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.071 |
-0.127 |
|
0.104 |
0.023 |
|
-0.120 |
-0.128 |
|
|
(0.266) |
(0.278) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.106) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.149 |
-0.155 |
|
-0.013 |
0.026 |
|
-0.008 |
-0.005 |
|
|
(0.098) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.090) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.027) |
(0.030) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.066 |
-0.057 |
|
0.044 |
0.084 |
|
-0.000 |
0.009 |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Education above median |
|
0.121** |
0.121* |
|
0.131** |
0.127** |
|
0.101*** |
0.097*** |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.015) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.036 |
-0.026 |
|
0.008 |
-0.003 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.043) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.217+ |
-0.208+ |
|
-0.070 |
-0.078 |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.114) |
(0.123) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.032) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.069 |
-0.086 |
|
-0.040 |
-0.051 |
|
0.003 |
-0.001 |
|
|
(0.048) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.017 |
0.022 |
|
-0.007 |
-0.004 |
|
0.006 |
0.005 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.059 |
-0.040 |
|
-0.103 |
-0.155* |
|
-0.030 |
-0.043* |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.066) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.021) |
| SC quota |
|
0.056 |
0.057 |
|
0.128 |
0.102 |
|
-0.027 |
-0.029 |
|
|
(0.095) |
(0.099) |
|
(0.085) |
(0.088) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.074 |
0.059 |
|
0.033 |
0.029 |
|
0.001 |
-0.009 |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.028 |
0.067 |
|
-0.264* |
-0.207 |
|
0.040 |
0.032 |
|
|
(0.274) |
(0.286) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.142) |
|
(0.105) |
(0.109) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.003 |
|
|
0.004* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.011 |
|
|
0.025 |
|
|
0.023 |
|
|
|
(0.049) |
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
369 |
339 |
| R2 |
0.086 |
0.142 |
0.143 |
0.033 |
0.100 |
0.148 |
0.251 |
0.396 |
0.398 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, comparing T2 to control, Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.333*** |
0.303** |
0.504*** |
0.841*** |
0.782*** |
0.715*** |
0.354*** |
0.262*** |
0.288*** |
|
(0.057) |
(0.103) |
(0.141) |
(0.044) |
(0.094) |
(0.129) |
(0.019) |
(0.034) |
(0.051) |
| t2 |
0.188* |
0.157+ |
0.189* |
0.021 |
0.024 |
-0.019 |
0.010 |
0.003 |
0.002 |
|
(0.077) |
(0.083) |
(0.084) |
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
(0.052) |
(0.024) |
(0.025) |
(0.026) |
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.220*** |
-0.201 |
-0.115 |
-0.084 |
-0.131 |
-0.103 |
-0.153*** |
-0.106+ |
-0.075 |
|
(0.064) |
(0.165) |
(0.193) |
(0.059) |
(0.158) |
(0.164) |
(0.022) |
(0.056) |
(0.060) |
| t2:Sarpanch woman |
-0.052 |
-0.029 |
-0.062 |
-0.075 |
-0.110 |
-0.062 |
0.007 |
0.016 |
0.018 |
|
(0.093) |
(0.100) |
(0.102) |
(0.082) |
(0.085) |
(0.083) |
(0.030) |
(0.030) |
(0.031) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.135 |
-0.143 |
|
0.193** |
0.150+ |
|
0.000 |
-0.016 |
|
|
(0.253) |
(0.255) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.168) |
(0.164) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.176 |
-0.184 |
|
-0.011 |
0.039 |
|
0.027 |
0.040 |
|
|
(0.132) |
(0.132) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.025) |
(0.026) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.051 |
-0.058 |
|
-0.020 |
0.057 |
|
0.008 |
0.018 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.070) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Education above median |
|
0.123* |
0.153** |
|
0.143** |
0.162*** |
|
0.071*** |
0.069*** |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.010 |
-0.014 |
|
-0.003 |
-0.024 |
|
0.015 |
0.013 |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.003 |
-0.025 |
|
0.131 |
0.077 |
|
-0.013 |
-0.025 |
|
|
(0.141) |
(0.166) |
|
(0.128) |
(0.136) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.056) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.002 |
-0.031 |
|
0.027 |
0.010 |
|
0.048** |
0.043* |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.017) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.001 |
-0.002 |
|
-0.026 |
-0.020 |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.005 |
-0.053 |
|
-0.032 |
-0.077 |
|
0.002 |
-0.020 |
|
|
(0.078) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.096) |
|
(0.022) |
(0.023) |
| SC quota |
|
0.172 |
0.155 |
|
0.036 |
0.019 |
|
-0.033 |
-0.048+ |
|
|
(0.133) |
(0.134) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.000 |
-0.028 |
|
0.100 |
0.065 |
|
0.010 |
0.001 |
|
|
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.070) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.108 |
0.122 |
|
-0.335* |
-0.310* |
|
-0.072 |
-0.062 |
|
|
(0.265) |
(0.267) |
|
(0.131) |
(0.145) |
|
(0.170) |
(0.166) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.003* |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.007 |
|
|
0.029 |
|
|
0.031+ |
|
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.114 |
0.136 |
0.160 |
0.024 |
0.097 |
0.130 |
0.231 |
0.366 |
0.377 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, grouping T1/T2 together, Disadvantage index
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.412*** |
0.570*** |
0.681*** |
0.898*** |
0.987*** |
0.942*** |
0.434*** |
0.370*** |
0.368*** |
|
(0.092) |
(0.154) |
(0.178) |
(0.078) |
(0.129) |
(0.153) |
(0.030) |
(0.048) |
(0.053) |
| Discussion rules |
0.176 |
0.158 |
0.146 |
0.123 |
0.118 |
0.076 |
0.017 |
0.006 |
0.006 |
|
(0.108) |
(0.106) |
(0.111) |
(0.088) |
(0.087) |
(0.082) |
(0.035) |
(0.033) |
(0.034) |
| Disadvantage index |
-0.081** |
-0.097+ |
-0.095+ |
-0.042 |
-0.084+ |
-0.094+ |
-0.064*** |
-0.038* |
-0.028+ |
|
(0.029) |
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
(0.028) |
(0.050) |
(0.052) |
(0.010) |
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
| Discussion rules:Disadvantage index |
-0.023 |
-0.027 |
-0.019 |
-0.039 |
-0.047 |
-0.035 |
0.003 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
|
(0.035) |
(0.035) |
(0.036) |
(0.033) |
(0.032) |
(0.031) |
(0.011) |
(0.010) |
(0.011) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.025 |
-0.016 |
|
0.043 |
0.099 |
|
-0.061 |
-0.046 |
|
|
(0.124) |
(0.140) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.131) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.008 |
-0.030 |
|
0.137** |
0.117+ |
|
0.023 |
0.011 |
|
|
(0.224) |
(0.228) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.124) |
(0.125) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.086 |
-0.104 |
|
0.109 |
0.161+ |
|
0.053+ |
0.053+ |
|
|
(0.102) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.088) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.027) |
(0.029) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.059 |
-0.052 |
|
0.018 |
0.075 |
|
0.007 |
0.018 |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Education above median |
|
0.057 |
0.078 |
|
0.070+ |
0.075+ |
|
0.064*** |
0.067*** |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.038) |
(0.039) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.155* |
-0.148* |
|
-0.100+ |
-0.119* |
|
-0.028 |
-0.019 |
|
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.019) |
(0.020) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.107 |
-0.113 |
|
0.081 |
0.031 |
|
-0.004 |
-0.011 |
|
|
(0.103) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.114) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.036) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.020 |
-0.042 |
|
-0.002 |
-0.011 |
|
0.023+ |
0.021 |
|
|
(0.042) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.010 |
0.013 |
|
-0.009 |
-0.003 |
|
0.007+ |
0.006 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.004) |
(0.004) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.014 |
0.005 |
|
-0.110+ |
-0.149* |
|
-0.019 |
-0.036+ |
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| SC quota |
|
0.160+ |
0.163+ |
|
0.071 |
0.040 |
|
-0.037+ |
-0.046* |
|
|
(0.090) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.023) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.037 |
0.017 |
|
0.038 |
0.012 |
|
0.002 |
-0.007 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.035 |
-0.019 |
|
-0.307** |
-0.307** |
|
-0.101 |
-0.103 |
|
|
(0.231) |
(0.237) |
|
(0.101) |
(0.111) |
|
(0.126) |
(0.126) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.003* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.012 |
|
|
0.008 |
|
|
0.025+ |
|
|
|
(0.041) |
|
|
(0.036) |
|
|
(0.013) |
| Num.Obs. |
546 |
546 |
503 |
546 |
546 |
503 |
545 |
545 |
502 |
| R2 |
0.081 |
0.139 |
0.146 |
0.046 |
0.102 |
0.132 |
0.213 |
0.373 |
0.379 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, comparing T1 to control, Disadvantage index
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.412*** |
0.557** |
0.709*** |
0.898*** |
1.074*** |
1.174*** |
0.434*** |
0.365*** |
0.387*** |
|
(0.092) |
(0.173) |
(0.201) |
(0.078) |
(0.145) |
(0.170) |
(0.030) |
(0.057) |
(0.065) |
| T1 |
0.149 |
0.150 |
0.144 |
0.115 |
0.132 |
0.061 |
0.027 |
0.022 |
0.021 |
|
(0.121) |
(0.118) |
(0.124) |
(0.094) |
(0.092) |
(0.086) |
(0.039) |
(0.037) |
(0.038) |
| Disadvantage index |
-0.081** |
-0.084 |
-0.118+ |
-0.042 |
-0.122* |
-0.140* |
-0.064*** |
-0.027 |
-0.022 |
|
(0.029) |
(0.056) |
(0.060) |
(0.028) |
(0.056) |
(0.055) |
(0.010) |
(0.019) |
(0.019) |
| T1:Disadvantage index |
-0.031 |
-0.043 |
-0.041 |
-0.022 |
-0.038 |
-0.017 |
0.000 |
-0.004 |
-0.003 |
|
(0.038) |
(0.038) |
(0.040) |
(0.036) |
(0.034) |
(0.033) |
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
0.080 |
0.091 |
|
0.185 |
0.203 |
|
-0.088* |
-0.076+ |
|
|
(0.131) |
(0.140) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.127) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.042) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.071 |
-0.125 |
|
0.105 |
0.028 |
|
-0.117 |
-0.126 |
|
|
(0.259) |
(0.271) |
|
(0.100) |
(0.111) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.104) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.090 |
-0.056 |
|
0.179+ |
0.223* |
|
0.020 |
0.019 |
|
|
(0.101) |
(0.109) |
|
(0.101) |
(0.100) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.038) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.073 |
-0.062 |
|
0.047 |
0.088 |
|
-0.000 |
0.009 |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Education above median |
|
0.075 |
0.061 |
|
0.059 |
0.053 |
|
0.088*** |
0.087*** |
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.159* |
-0.183* |
|
-0.139* |
-0.159* |
|
-0.028 |
-0.022 |
|
|
(0.071) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.062) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.025) |
(0.025) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.209+ |
-0.200+ |
|
-0.075 |
-0.081 |
|
0.006 |
0.003 |
|
|
(0.109) |
(0.117) |
|
(0.126) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.032) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.077 |
-0.097+ |
|
-0.069 |
-0.079 |
|
-0.001 |
-0.005 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.018) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.023 |
0.030+ |
|
0.003 |
0.006 |
|
0.008 |
0.007 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.048 |
-0.017 |
|
-0.091 |
-0.141* |
|
-0.030 |
-0.042+ |
|
|
(0.065) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.022) |
| SC quota |
|
0.113 |
0.111 |
|
0.112 |
0.087 |
|
-0.019 |
-0.023 |
|
|
(0.081) |
(0.086) |
|
(0.085) |
(0.088) |
|
(0.027) |
(0.030) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.085 |
0.069 |
|
0.026 |
0.020 |
|
0.002 |
-0.008 |
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.019) |
(0.019) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.039 |
0.076 |
|
-0.279+ |
-0.227 |
|
0.037 |
0.029 |
|
|
(0.268) |
(0.281) |
|
(0.147) |
(0.156) |
|
(0.104) |
(0.106) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.003 |
|
|
0.003* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.004 |
|
|
0.025 |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.041) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
367 |
367 |
337 |
367 |
367 |
337 |
366 |
366 |
336 |
| R2 |
0.082 |
0.168 |
0.173 |
0.034 |
0.122 |
0.173 |
0.217 |
0.402 |
0.402 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC3 (H3.3) table, comparing T2 to control, Disadvantage index
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.412*** |
0.480** |
0.623** |
0.898*** |
1.033*** |
0.943*** |
0.434*** |
0.385*** |
0.384*** |
|
(0.092) |
(0.180) |
(0.214) |
(0.078) |
(0.160) |
(0.200) |
(0.030) |
(0.054) |
(0.065) |
| T2 |
0.203 |
0.184 |
0.164 |
0.133 |
0.110 |
0.072 |
0.005 |
-0.012 |
-0.012 |
|
(0.124) |
(0.127) |
(0.134) |
(0.101) |
(0.102) |
(0.099) |
(0.038) |
(0.038) |
(0.039) |
| Disadvantage index |
-0.081** |
-0.071 |
-0.042 |
-0.042 |
-0.096 |
-0.097 |
-0.064*** |
-0.053** |
-0.042* |
|
(0.029) |
(0.059) |
(0.063) |
(0.028) |
(0.063) |
(0.069) |
(0.010) |
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| T2:Disadvantage index |
-0.013 |
-0.017 |
-0.004 |
-0.059 |
-0.061 |
-0.052 |
0.006 |
0.007 |
0.008 |
|
(0.040) |
(0.042) |
(0.044) |
(0.039) |
(0.038) |
(0.038) |
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.144 |
-0.128 |
|
-0.031 |
-0.004 |
|
-0.045 |
-0.029 |
|
|
(0.166) |
(0.197) |
|
(0.162) |
(0.175) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.063) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.136 |
-0.145 |
|
0.187* |
0.145 |
|
-0.003 |
-0.019 |
|
|
(0.248) |
(0.254) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.161) |
(0.159) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.100 |
-0.143 |
|
0.123 |
0.169 |
|
0.079* |
0.081* |
|
|
(0.145) |
(0.147) |
|
(0.120) |
(0.126) |
|
(0.032) |
(0.035) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.056 |
-0.065 |
|
-0.020 |
0.055 |
|
0.005 |
0.014 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.068) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Education above median |
|
0.087 |
0.133* |
|
0.087+ |
0.106* |
|
0.046** |
0.050** |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.094 |
-0.059 |
|
-0.137+ |
-0.158+ |
|
-0.038+ |
-0.028 |
|
|
(0.078) |
(0.083) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.083) |
|
(0.022) |
(0.024) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.007 |
-0.023 |
|
0.122 |
0.082 |
|
-0.010 |
-0.019 |
|
|
(0.140) |
(0.167) |
|
(0.118) |
(0.128) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.054) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.004 |
-0.023 |
|
0.026 |
0.010 |
|
0.048** |
0.043* |
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.017) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.001 |
-0.003 |
|
-0.023 |
-0.018 |
|
0.006 |
0.003 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.032 |
-0.020 |
|
-0.031 |
-0.065 |
|
0.002 |
-0.019 |
|
|
(0.073) |
(0.086) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.022) |
(0.024) |
| SC quota |
|
0.172 |
0.149 |
|
0.043 |
0.024 |
|
-0.033 |
-0.049+ |
|
|
(0.136) |
(0.136) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.027) |
(0.029) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.001 |
-0.026 |
|
0.093 |
0.059 |
|
0.013 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.064) |
(0.068) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.119 |
0.133 |
|
-0.322* |
-0.298+ |
|
-0.069 |
-0.061 |
|
|
(0.260) |
(0.266) |
|
(0.137) |
(0.157) |
|
(0.163) |
(0.160) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.003* |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.011 |
|
|
0.032 |
|
|
0.032* |
|
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
350 |
350 |
324 |
350 |
350 |
324 |
350 |
350 |
324 |
| R2 |
0.090 |
0.147 |
0.165 |
0.048 |
0.116 |
0.148 |
0.206 |
0.381 |
0.385 |
IC4 (H3.4): Assignment to any treatment (T1 or T2, considered
jointly) will improve institutional centrality at a higher rate if the
gram sevak is from a disadvantaged group.
- IC4 is assessed by regressing our two primary measures of centrality
(as specified immediately above in IC2) on a binary indicator of
treatment (bundling T1 and T2 versus control), an indicator of the
gender of the gram sevak and the multiplicative interaction between the
two. Our focus is on the interaction effects for each of these
specifications. We also control for the potential presence of a sarpanch
relative during the interview (“the interview” being here understood as
the group interview), both separately and in interaction with the gender
of the sarpanch. Cluster-corrected standard errors will be used at the
administrative block level. We check the robustness of results with
bivariate regressions on treatment status and a multivariate regression
including a standard set of demographic controls.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2. We also
include the series of individual and village level controls presented in
G2.
- Deviation 1: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Precision 1: We originally said there were two
primary measures of centrality. This was on error on our part: this
should be three.
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC4 (H3.4) table, grouping T1/T2 together
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.195*** |
0.355*** |
0.473*** |
0.771*** |
0.774*** |
0.716*** |
0.253*** |
0.281*** |
0.302*** |
|
(0.037) |
(0.082) |
(0.110) |
(0.039) |
(0.075) |
(0.095) |
(0.015) |
(0.025) |
(0.036) |
| Discussion rules |
0.130** |
0.097+ |
0.109* |
0.025 |
0.021 |
-0.004 |
0.025 |
0.006 |
0.006 |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
(0.047) |
(0.018) |
(0.016) |
(0.016) |
| Gram sevak woman |
-0.006 |
-0.021 |
-0.008 |
0.040 |
0.073 |
0.034 |
0.006 |
-0.005 |
-0.009 |
|
(0.059) |
(0.059) |
(0.061) |
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
(0.064) |
(0.023) |
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Discussion rules:Gram sevak woman |
-0.017 |
-0.003 |
-0.018 |
-0.012 |
-0.059 |
-0.026 |
0.019 |
0.020 |
0.022 |
|
(0.075) |
(0.075) |
(0.078) |
(0.072) |
(0.074) |
(0.074) |
(0.028) |
(0.024) |
(0.025) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.138 |
-0.102 |
|
-0.099 |
-0.032 |
|
-0.101** |
-0.073+ |
|
|
(0.120) |
(0.135) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.127) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.040) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.001 |
-0.026 |
|
0.154*** |
0.129* |
|
0.023 |
0.009 |
|
|
(0.228) |
(0.233) |
|
(0.038) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.126) |
(0.126) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.167+ |
-0.179+ |
|
-0.040 |
0.008 |
|
0.015 |
0.024 |
|
|
(0.095) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.022) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.053 |
-0.045 |
|
0.016 |
0.072 |
|
0.007 |
0.018 |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Education above median |
|
0.106** |
0.121** |
|
0.122*** |
0.129*** |
|
0.081*** |
0.079*** |
|
|
(0.040) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.023 |
-0.026 |
|
0.022 |
0.006 |
|
0.011 |
0.010 |
|
|
(0.038) |
(0.039) |
|
(0.036) |
(0.037) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.111 |
-0.123 |
|
0.088 |
0.032 |
|
-0.005 |
-0.012 |
|
|
(0.107) |
(0.120) |
|
(0.118) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.037) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.018 |
-0.041 |
|
0.015 |
0.005 |
|
0.026+ |
0.022 |
|
|
(0.042) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.006 |
0.009 |
|
-0.016 |
-0.009 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
|
(0.004) |
(0.004) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.004 |
-0.017 |
|
-0.105+ |
-0.152* |
|
-0.018 |
-0.037+ |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| SC quota |
|
0.111 |
0.118 |
|
0.083 |
0.053 |
|
-0.039+ |
-0.047* |
|
|
(0.093) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.022) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.028 |
0.008 |
|
0.043 |
0.020 |
|
0.002 |
-0.006 |
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.016) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.053 |
-0.035 |
|
-0.316** |
-0.313** |
|
-0.099 |
-0.099 |
|
|
(0.236) |
(0.242) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.128) |
(0.127) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.002* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
0.007 |
|
|
0.026* |
|
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.036) |
|
|
(0.013) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
604 |
548 |
505 |
| R2 |
0.017 |
0.119 |
0.129 |
0.002 |
0.089 |
0.119 |
0.014 |
0.367 |
0.377 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC4 (H3.4) table, comparing T1 to control
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.195*** |
0.381*** |
0.455*** |
0.771*** |
0.764*** |
0.810*** |
0.253*** |
0.307*** |
0.338*** |
|
(0.037) |
(0.089) |
(0.125) |
(0.039) |
(0.087) |
(0.105) |
(0.015) |
(0.030) |
(0.043) |
| T1 |
0.057 |
0.024 |
0.031 |
0.066 |
0.067 |
0.034 |
0.026 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
(0.061) |
(0.051) |
(0.051) |
(0.050) |
(0.022) |
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Gram sevak woman |
-0.006 |
-0.041 |
-0.032 |
0.040 |
0.073 |
0.038 |
0.006 |
-0.011 |
-0.014 |
|
(0.059) |
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
(0.063) |
(0.023) |
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| T1:Gram sevak woman |
0.015 |
0.049 |
0.036 |
-0.040 |
-0.085 |
-0.042 |
0.024 |
0.026 |
0.032 |
|
(0.084) |
(0.084) |
(0.089) |
(0.079) |
(0.081) |
(0.081) |
(0.032) |
(0.027) |
(0.028) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.011 |
-0.019 |
|
0.035 |
0.050 |
|
-0.120** |
-0.102** |
|
|
(0.133) |
(0.144) |
|
(0.136) |
(0.124) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.038) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.089 |
-0.146 |
|
0.109 |
0.026 |
|
-0.121 |
-0.128 |
|
|
(0.279) |
(0.292) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.105) |
(0.108) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.148 |
-0.154 |
|
-0.009 |
0.025 |
|
-0.009 |
-0.006 |
|
|
(0.097) |
(0.102) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.027) |
(0.030) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.067 |
-0.057 |
|
0.044 |
0.083 |
|
-0.001 |
0.008 |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Education above median |
|
0.120** |
0.121* |
|
0.130** |
0.126** |
|
0.101*** |
0.096*** |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.015) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.033 |
-0.025 |
|
0.011 |
-0.001 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.043) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.216+ |
-0.209+ |
|
-0.072 |
-0.079 |
|
0.008 |
0.005 |
|
|
(0.116) |
(0.125) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.032) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.073 |
-0.090+ |
|
-0.037 |
-0.049 |
|
0.002 |
-0.003 |
|
|
(0.048) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.017 |
0.022 |
|
-0.008 |
-0.005 |
|
0.006 |
0.005 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.059 |
-0.041 |
|
-0.094 |
-0.150* |
|
-0.029 |
-0.043+ |
|
|
(0.068) |
(0.075) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.066) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.022) |
| SC quota |
|
0.049 |
0.051 |
|
0.124 |
0.102 |
|
-0.026 |
-0.028 |
|
|
(0.094) |
(0.099) |
|
(0.086) |
(0.089) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.072 |
0.057 |
|
0.030 |
0.028 |
|
0.002 |
-0.007 |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.019) |
(0.019) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.044 |
0.086 |
|
-0.270* |
-0.211 |
|
0.041 |
0.033 |
|
|
(0.287) |
(0.300) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.141) |
|
(0.107) |
(0.111) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
0.004* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.011 |
|
|
0.023 |
|
|
0.024 |
|
|
|
(0.049) |
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
369 |
339 |
| R2 |
0.006 |
0.142 |
0.142 |
0.005 |
0.101 |
0.149 |
0.018 |
0.397 |
0.400 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC4 (H3.4) table, comparing T2 to control
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.195*** |
0.328** |
0.528*** |
0.771*** |
0.781*** |
0.728*** |
0.253*** |
0.254*** |
0.283*** |
|
(0.037) |
(0.101) |
(0.134) |
(0.039) |
(0.094) |
(0.128) |
(0.015) |
(0.032) |
(0.048) |
| t2 |
0.212*** |
0.165* |
0.181** |
-0.021 |
-0.025 |
-0.051 |
0.025 |
0.003 |
0.004 |
|
(0.060) |
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
(0.059) |
(0.021) |
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Gram sevak woman |
-0.006 |
-0.015 |
0.002 |
0.040 |
0.080 |
0.041 |
0.006 |
-0.001 |
-0.005 |
|
(0.059) |
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
(0.060) |
(0.064) |
(0.065) |
(0.023) |
(0.021) |
(0.021) |
| t2:Gram sevak woman |
-0.057 |
-0.051 |
-0.064 |
0.021 |
-0.045 |
-0.017 |
0.013 |
0.019 |
0.018 |
|
(0.091) |
(0.094) |
(0.097) |
(0.084) |
(0.089) |
(0.091) |
(0.032) |
(0.028) |
(0.029) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.229 |
-0.157 |
|
-0.185 |
-0.130 |
|
-0.094+ |
-0.063 |
|
|
(0.159) |
(0.192) |
|
(0.160) |
(0.170) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.060) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.119 |
-0.128 |
|
0.194** |
0.147+ |
|
-0.004 |
-0.020 |
|
|
(0.259) |
(0.264) |
|
(0.068) |
(0.085) |
|
(0.164) |
(0.160) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.175 |
-0.182 |
|
-0.008 |
0.039 |
|
0.026 |
0.040 |
|
|
(0.133) |
(0.132) |
|
(0.100) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.025) |
(0.027) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.050 |
-0.057 |
|
-0.022 |
0.055 |
|
0.007 |
0.017 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.020) |
| Education above median |
|
0.122* |
0.153** |
|
0.145** |
0.163*** |
|
0.071*** |
0.069*** |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.009 |
-0.012 |
|
-0.001 |
-0.022 |
|
0.015 |
0.012 |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
0.003 |
-0.022 |
|
0.126 |
0.073 |
|
-0.015 |
-0.026 |
|
|
(0.142) |
(0.168) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.140) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.056) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.005 |
-0.031 |
|
0.033 |
0.013 |
|
0.049** |
0.042* |
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.000 |
-0.002 |
|
-0.026+ |
-0.021 |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.009 |
-0.049 |
|
-0.028 |
-0.076 |
|
0.001 |
-0.022 |
|
|
(0.081) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.022) |
(0.023) |
| SC quota |
|
0.161 |
0.144 |
|
0.039 |
0.021 |
|
-0.030 |
-0.046 |
|
|
(0.133) |
(0.133) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.027) |
(0.029) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.004 |
-0.031 |
|
0.099 |
0.065 |
|
0.011 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.064) |
(0.068) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.088 |
0.101 |
|
-0.329* |
-0.303* |
|
-0.066 |
-0.057 |
|
|
(0.270) |
(0.277) |
|
(0.138) |
(0.150) |
|
(0.166) |
(0.162) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.003* |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.007 |
|
|
0.029 |
|
|
0.031+ |
|
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.045 |
0.138 |
0.161 |
0.004 |
0.098 |
0.131 |
0.012 |
0.367 |
0.377 |
IC5 (H3.5): Assignment to any treatment (T1 or T2, considered
jointly) will improve institutional centrality at a higher rate if the
treatment also led to equal participation (IC1).
- IC5 is assessed by regressing our primary measures of centrality on
a binary indicator of treatment (bundling T1 and T2 versus control),
indicators of equal participation (as described in IC 1 above) and the
multiplicative interaction between the two. Our focus is on the
interaction effects for each of these specifications. We also control
for the potential presence of a sarpanch relative during the interview
(“the interview” being here understood as the group interview), both
separately and in interaction with the gender of the sarpanch.
Cluster-corrected standard errors will be used at the administrative
block level. We check the robustness of results with bivariate
regressions on treatment status and a multivariate regression including
a standard set of demographic controls.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2. We also
include the series of individual and village level controls presented in
G2.
- Deviation 1: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Deviation 2: This analysis may induce
post-treatment bias through conditioning on a post-treatment variable
(treatment take-up). We conduct the analysis as specified but in the
main paper will report the estimation of complier average causal effects
instead.
- Deviation 3: We initially specified using both
indicators of equal participation, however we only include the indicator
for whether or not the sarpanch spoke at all, as speaking first was not
the prompt for T2.
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC5 (H3.5) table, grouping T1/T2 together
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.026 |
0.233** |
0.330** |
0.711*** |
0.805*** |
0.729*** |
0.145*** |
0.221*** |
0.239*** |
|
(0.026) |
(0.077) |
(0.100) |
(0.075) |
(0.097) |
(0.114) |
(0.020) |
(0.028) |
(0.037) |
| Discussion rules |
0.075 |
0.034 |
0.109* |
-0.100 |
-0.156 |
-0.179+ |
0.017 |
-0.006 |
-0.001 |
|
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
(0.048) |
(0.098) |
(0.100) |
(0.106) |
(0.025) |
(0.023) |
(0.025) |
| Sarpanch spoke budget question |
0.207*** |
0.116* |
0.154*** |
0.095 |
-0.024 |
-0.040 |
0.138*** |
0.062** |
0.060** |
|
(0.043) |
(0.049) |
(0.046) |
(0.081) |
(0.084) |
(0.085) |
(0.023) |
(0.021) |
(0.022) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch spoke budget question |
0.041 |
0.066 |
-0.016 |
0.137 |
0.183+ |
0.196+ |
0.010 |
0.021 |
0.016 |
|
(0.064) |
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
(0.105) |
(0.108) |
(0.114) |
(0.029) |
(0.027) |
(0.028) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.136 |
-0.113 |
|
-0.088 |
-0.028 |
|
-0.097** |
-0.074+ |
|
|
(0.118) |
(0.134) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.129) |
|
(0.037) |
(0.040) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.006 |
-0.009 |
|
0.133** |
0.116* |
|
0.030 |
0.020 |
|
|
(0.221) |
(0.222) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.056) |
|
(0.119) |
(0.118) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.172+ |
-0.181+ |
|
-0.045 |
0.007 |
|
0.014 |
0.024 |
|
|
(0.094) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.022) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.051 |
-0.046 |
|
0.018 |
0.075 |
|
0.010 |
0.020 |
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Education above median |
|
0.094* |
0.111** |
|
0.115*** |
0.123*** |
|
0.075*** |
0.074*** |
|
|
(0.040) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.033 |
-0.033 |
|
0.016 |
0.000 |
|
0.007 |
0.006 |
|
|
(0.038) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.036) |
(0.036) |
|
(0.011) |
(0.012) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.098 |
-0.102 |
|
0.091 |
0.041 |
|
-0.000 |
-0.005 |
|
|
(0.107) |
(0.120) |
|
(0.117) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.036) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.007 |
-0.034 |
|
0.022 |
0.011 |
|
0.031* |
0.027+ |
|
|
(0.043) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.039) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.014) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.008 |
0.010 |
|
-0.013 |
-0.007 |
|
0.006+ |
0.005 |
|
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) |
|
(0.004) |
(0.004) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.018 |
-0.001 |
|
-0.102 |
-0.149* |
|
-0.013 |
-0.030 |
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.020) |
| SC quota |
|
0.127 |
0.128 |
|
0.094 |
0.064 |
|
-0.036+ |
-0.044* |
|
|
(0.092) |
(0.096) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.019) |
(0.021) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.016 |
-0.004 |
|
0.036 |
0.014 |
|
-0.006 |
-0.014 |
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.016) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.031 |
-0.013 |
|
-0.283** |
-0.282* |
|
-0.094 |
-0.093 |
|
|
(0.228) |
(0.230) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.109) |
|
(0.121) |
(0.120) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
0.002+ |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.020 |
|
|
0.009 |
|
|
0.025* |
|
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.036) |
|
|
(0.013) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
604 |
548 |
505 |
| R2 |
0.053 |
0.134 |
0.140 |
0.032 |
0.099 |
0.130 |
0.121 |
0.392 |
0.397 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC4 (H3.4) table, comparing T1 to control
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.026 |
0.267** |
0.301* |
0.711*** |
0.803*** |
0.816*** |
0.145*** |
0.255*** |
0.277*** |
|
(0.026) |
(0.084) |
(0.117) |
(0.075) |
(0.106) |
(0.121) |
(0.020) |
(0.032) |
(0.043) |
| T1 |
-0.026 |
-0.030 |
0.024 |
-0.124 |
-0.160 |
-0.172 |
0.000 |
-0.018 |
-0.020 |
|
(0.026) |
(0.041) |
(0.038) |
(0.119) |
(0.122) |
(0.131) |
(0.027) |
(0.025) |
(0.028) |
| Sarpanch spoke budget question |
0.207*** |
0.109* |
0.153** |
0.095 |
-0.023 |
-0.035 |
0.138*** |
0.053** |
0.053* |
|
(0.043) |
(0.049) |
(0.047) |
(0.081) |
(0.082) |
(0.082) |
(0.023) |
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| T1:Sarpanch spoke budget question |
0.088 |
0.080 |
0.016 |
0.195 |
0.226+ |
0.219 |
0.031 |
0.032 |
0.036 |
|
(0.055) |
(0.063) |
(0.066) |
(0.126) |
(0.129) |
(0.137) |
(0.032) |
(0.029) |
(0.032) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.017 |
-0.023 |
|
0.031 |
0.057 |
|
-0.118** |
-0.098** |
|
|
(0.128) |
(0.137) |
|
(0.139) |
(0.129) |
|
(0.037) |
(0.037) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.044 |
-0.087 |
|
0.089 |
0.024 |
|
-0.103 |
-0.106 |
|
|
(0.264) |
(0.271) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.105) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.093) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.152 |
-0.152 |
|
-0.019 |
0.026 |
|
-0.010 |
-0.004 |
|
|
(0.096) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.060 |
-0.053 |
|
0.046 |
0.087 |
|
0.004 |
0.012 |
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.019) |
(0.020) |
| Education above median |
|
0.102* |
0.105* |
|
0.118** |
0.120** |
|
0.093*** |
0.090*** |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.015) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.044 |
-0.032 |
|
0.005 |
-0.006 |
|
0.000 |
0.001 |
|
|
(0.043) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.201+ |
-0.192 |
|
-0.061 |
-0.072 |
|
0.012 |
0.009 |
|
|
(0.114) |
(0.121) |
|
(0.131) |
(0.121) |
|
(0.033) |
(0.031) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.064 |
-0.082 |
|
-0.035 |
-0.046 |
|
0.006 |
0.002 |
|
|
(0.048) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.017) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.016 |
0.022 |
|
-0.007 |
-0.004 |
|
0.006 |
0.005 |
|
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.040 |
-0.023 |
|
-0.085 |
-0.150* |
|
-0.023 |
-0.038+ |
|
|
(0.065) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.070) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.022) |
| SC quota |
|
0.064 |
0.055 |
|
0.142 |
0.111 |
|
-0.021 |
-0.027 |
|
|
(0.092) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.087) |
|
(0.024) |
(0.026) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.061 |
0.042 |
|
0.028 |
0.026 |
|
-0.004 |
-0.014 |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.016 |
0.058 |
|
-0.249+ |
-0.201 |
|
0.031 |
0.024 |
|
|
(0.272) |
(0.280) |
|
(0.131) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.096) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002+ |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
0.003* |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.004 |
|
|
0.023 |
|
|
0.021 |
|
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.041) |
|
|
(0.015) |
| Num.Obs. |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
369 |
339 |
| R2 |
0.055 |
0.156 |
0.156 |
0.043 |
0.112 |
0.160 |
0.136 |
0.417 |
0.418 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch made final budget decision |
DV: Sarpanch responded first to roles/resp. |
DV: Proportion of time sarpanch spoke |
IC4 (H3.4) table, comparing T2 to control
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.026 |
0.191+ |
0.388** |
0.711*** |
0.825*** |
0.765*** |
0.145*** |
0.195*** |
0.226*** |
|
(0.026) |
(0.098) |
(0.125) |
(0.075) |
(0.111) |
(0.141) |
(0.020) |
(0.034) |
(0.048) |
| t2 |
0.174* |
0.085 |
0.166* |
-0.077 |
-0.153 |
-0.177 |
0.033 |
-0.002 |
0.007 |
|
(0.079) |
(0.074) |
(0.076) |
(0.116) |
(0.115) |
(0.126) |
(0.032) |
(0.030) |
(0.030) |
| Sarpanch spoke budget question |
0.207*** |
0.120* |
0.165*** |
0.095 |
-0.027 |
-0.052 |
0.138*** |
0.063** |
0.062** |
|
(0.043) |
(0.052) |
(0.049) |
(0.081) |
(0.084) |
(0.087) |
(0.023) |
(0.022) |
(0.023) |
| t2:Sarpanch spoke budget question |
0.003 |
0.064 |
-0.020 |
0.076 |
0.136 |
0.146 |
-0.010 |
0.015 |
0.005 |
|
(0.094) |
(0.091) |
(0.095) |
(0.125) |
(0.125) |
(0.135) |
(0.036) |
(0.033) |
(0.033) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.199 |
-0.158 |
|
-0.174 |
-0.129 |
|
-0.092+ |
-0.072 |
|
|
(0.151) |
(0.185) |
|
(0.155) |
(0.167) |
|
(0.053) |
(0.061) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.126 |
-0.125 |
|
0.178* |
0.131 |
|
0.007 |
-0.008 |
|
|
(0.244) |
(0.246) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.156) |
(0.151) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.170 |
-0.180 |
|
-0.007 |
0.040 |
|
0.028 |
0.041 |
|
|
(0.132) |
(0.130) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.027) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.046 |
-0.058 |
|
-0.021 |
0.057 |
|
0.010 |
0.018 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.070) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.019) |
(0.020) |
| Education above median |
|
0.117* |
0.144** |
|
0.145** |
0.163*** |
|
0.068*** |
0.065*** |
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.019 |
-0.022 |
|
-0.002 |
-0.024 |
|
0.011 |
0.008 |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.014) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
0.009 |
-0.001 |
|
0.128 |
0.078 |
|
-0.007 |
-0.014 |
|
|
(0.137) |
(0.164) |
|
(0.131) |
(0.140) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.056) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.008 |
-0.024 |
|
0.033 |
0.015 |
|
0.052** |
0.046** |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.017) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.005 |
0.001 |
|
-0.024 |
-0.019 |
|
0.006 |
0.004 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.004) |
(0.005) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.004 |
-0.039 |
|
-0.037 |
-0.080 |
|
0.003 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.075) |
(0.087) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.023) |
(0.025) |
| SC quota |
|
0.171 |
0.151 |
|
0.035 |
0.023 |
|
-0.033 |
-0.047+ |
|
|
(0.132) |
(0.131) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.102) |
|
(0.026) |
(0.028) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.018 |
-0.048 |
|
0.093 |
0.063 |
|
0.002 |
-0.007 |
|
|
(0.065) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.140 |
0.152 |
|
-0.306* |
-0.283+ |
|
-0.060 |
-0.051 |
|
|
(0.254) |
(0.257) |
|
(0.137) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.158) |
(0.153) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.003* |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.000) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.005 |
|
|
0.033 |
|
|
0.030+ |
|
|
|
(0.051) |
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.016) |
| Num.Obs. |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.073 |
0.150 |
0.173 |
0.015 |
0.098 |
0.133 |
0.116 |
0.391 |
0.396 |
IC6 (H3.6a): The sarpanch will indicate greater comfort,
confidence and engagement, and less fear in her/his comportment for
those assigned to treatment (T1 or T2, considered jointly) versus not
(Control).
- IC6 is assessed by regressing indicators of the sarpanch’s comfort,
confidence and engagement during the group meeting on a binary indicator
of treatment (bundling T1 and T2 versus control), and on the set of
demographic controls defined in our online appendix. We also control for
the potential presence of a sarpanch relative during the interview (“the
interview” being here understood as the group interview), both
separately and in interaction with the gender of the sarpanch.
Cluster-corrected standard errors will be used at the administrative
block level in both cases.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2. We also
include the series of individual and village level controls presented in
G2.
- To measure the sarpanch’s comfort, confidence and engagement we rely
on the following items from the group survey:
- Q71: How loudly did the sarpanch speak, compared to others, during
the interview? (Code volume as 1 if Sarpanch was either the loudest (1)
or average, compared to everyone else (2). Code volume as 0 if the
sarpanch was the quietest (3)). [Note: This is only coded if the
sarpanch spoke at all during the entire interview, i.e. Q70 = 1.]
- Q72: IF YES to sarpanch speaks above: Did the sarpanch speak in a
way that implied inferior status/deference towards other participants to
the meeting, or did they seek approval from others when speaking? (Code
equal status as 1 if answer is 0 (No), 0 if answer is 1 (Yes)).
- Q73: IF YES to sarpanch speaks above: Was the sarpanch’s speech
hesitant (stuttering, slow, broken up, or interrogative) at times? (Code
confidence as 1 if answer is 0 (No), 0 if answer is 1 (Yes)).
- Q75: IF YES TO sarpanch speaks above: Did she/he ever attempt to
move the discussion toward his/her opinion? For example - did she/he
ever try to convince or persuade others of her opinion? (Code: Engaged
decision making as 1 if answer is 1 (Yes), and 0 if answer is 0
(No)).
- Q77: IF YES TO sarpanch speaks above: Did the sarpanch try to
understand the opinion of others? For example, did the sarpanch actively
ask the opinion or reasoning of other people in the room?(Code: Active
listening as 1 if answer is 1 (Yes), and 0 if answer is 0 (No)).
- Q78: IF YES TO sarpanch speaks above, did the sarpanch engage in
consensus building with others, trying to come to an agreement? (Code
Consensus building as 1 if answer is 1 (Yes), and 0 if answer is 0
(No)).
- Q98.1-3: Overall, based on your own assessment and impressions, how
would you characterize the body language of the sarpanch throughout the
interview? Did her/his body language suggest…..Confidence/
Fear/Nervousness / Interest in the conversation? Code Confidence as 1 if
Q98.1 answer is 1 (Definitely yes), 0 if answer is 2-3 (Maybe/
Definitely no). Code Fearless as 1 if Q98.2 answer is 2-3 (Maybe/
Definitely no), 0 if answer is 1 (Definitely yes). Code Interest as 1 if
Q98.3 answer is 1 (Definitely yes), 0 if answer is 2-3 (Maybe/
Definitely no).
- Deviation 1: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Precision 1: For the first six measures, we code
sarpanches who did not speak at all as not exihibiting the measures of
confidence.
| |
DV: Sarpanch loudest |
DV: Sarpanch equal status. |
DV: Sarpanch confidence speech |
DV: Sarpanch engaged decision-making |
DV: Sarpanch active listening |
DV: Sarpanch consensus building |
DV: Sarpanch body language confidence |
DV: Sarpanch body language fearlessness |
DV: Sarpanch body language interest |
IC6 (H3.6a) table, grouping T1/T2 together
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.687*** |
0.699*** |
0.664*** |
0.458*** |
0.428*** |
0.467*** |
0.536*** |
0.537*** |
0.557*** |
0.417*** |
0.555*** |
0.606*** |
0.531*** |
0.619*** |
0.622*** |
0.734*** |
0.871*** |
0.849*** |
0.578*** |
0.628*** |
0.709*** |
0.771*** |
0.677*** |
0.698*** |
0.641*** |
0.685*** |
0.736*** |
|
(0.034) |
(0.075) |
(0.102) |
(0.036) |
(0.087) |
(0.120) |
(0.036) |
(0.077) |
(0.110) |
(0.036) |
(0.080) |
(0.116) |
(0.036) |
(0.087) |
(0.120) |
(0.032) |
(0.081) |
(0.107) |
(0.036) |
(0.078) |
(0.110) |
(0.030) |
(0.068) |
(0.090) |
(0.035) |
(0.076) |
(0.110) |
| Discussion rules |
0.029 |
-0.013 |
-0.002 |
-0.027 |
-0.034 |
-0.035 |
0.049 |
0.000 |
-0.015 |
-0.063 |
-0.098* |
-0.102* |
0.028 |
0.010 |
0.013 |
-0.008 |
-0.025 |
-0.031 |
0.008 |
-0.028 |
-0.009 |
0.014 |
0.004 |
-0.007 |
0.023 |
-0.006 |
-0.006 |
|
(0.040) |
(0.038) |
(0.040) |
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
(0.048) |
(0.043) |
(0.040) |
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
(0.048) |
(0.039) |
(0.041) |
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
(0.040) |
(0.043) |
(0.037) |
(0.037) |
(0.037) |
(0.042) |
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.160 |
-0.168 |
|
-0.213 |
-0.137 |
|
-0.219+ |
-0.260+ |
|
-0.166 |
-0.118 |
|
-0.154 |
-0.208 |
|
-0.157 |
-0.193 |
|
-0.381** |
-0.286+ |
|
-0.097 |
-0.124 |
|
-0.174 |
-0.182 |
|
|
(0.106) |
(0.112) |
|
(0.143) |
(0.158) |
|
(0.132) |
(0.144) |
|
(0.143) |
(0.156) |
|
(0.151) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.125) |
(0.133) |
|
(0.147) |
(0.159) |
|
(0.106) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.153) |
(0.163) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.135* |
0.121+ |
|
-0.108 |
-0.123 |
|
0.202*** |
0.194*** |
|
0.116 |
0.079 |
|
0.218 |
0.221 |
|
0.243*** |
0.252*** |
|
0.017 |
-0.025 |
|
0.105*** |
0.096+ |
|
-0.002 |
-0.000 |
|
|
(0.054) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.248) |
(0.254) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.263) |
(0.254) |
|
(0.206) |
(0.181) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.202) |
(0.192) |
|
(0.029) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.203) |
(0.209) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.150* |
0.153* |
|
-0.012 |
-0.021 |
|
0.143+ |
0.139+ |
|
0.049 |
0.057 |
|
0.092 |
0.072 |
|
0.059 |
0.018 |
|
0.143+ |
0.138+ |
|
0.086 |
0.053 |
|
0.116 |
0.097 |
|
|
(0.075) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.100) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.089) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.084) |
(0.083) |
|
(0.096) |
(0.099) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.023 |
0.002 |
|
-0.042 |
-0.018 |
|
0.070 |
0.065 |
|
-0.032 |
-0.016 |
|
-0.070 |
-0.060 |
|
-0.001 |
-0.019 |
|
0.051 |
0.070 |
|
0.079+ |
0.056 |
|
0.002 |
-0.011 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
| Education above median |
|
0.186*** |
0.212*** |
|
-0.009 |
-0.010 |
|
0.141*** |
0.137** |
|
0.088* |
0.080+ |
|
0.030 |
0.028 |
|
0.051 |
0.049 |
|
0.151*** |
0.159*** |
|
0.128*** |
0.143*** |
|
0.109** |
0.134** |
|
|
(0.037) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.021 |
0.006 |
|
0.013 |
-0.024 |
|
0.036 |
0.037 |
|
0.045 |
0.052 |
|
0.128** |
0.144** |
|
0.073+ |
0.092* |
|
0.094* |
0.074+ |
|
0.038 |
0.049 |
|
0.045 |
0.060 |
|
|
(0.038) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.040) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.036) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.102 |
-0.056 |
|
0.137 |
0.138 |
|
-0.038 |
-0.005 |
|
-0.019 |
-0.038 |
|
0.041 |
0.083 |
|
0.023 |
0.050 |
|
0.060 |
0.050 |
|
0.038 |
0.054 |
|
-0.055 |
-0.026 |
|
|
(0.084) |
(0.085) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.142) |
|
(0.119) |
(0.125) |
|
(0.126) |
(0.133) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.135) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.109) |
|
(0.133) |
(0.141) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.141) |
(0.148) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.043 |
0.051 |
|
-0.027 |
-0.036 |
|
0.010 |
0.014 |
|
0.022 |
0.006 |
|
-0.008 |
0.004 |
|
-0.067 |
-0.040 |
|
0.046 |
0.041 |
|
0.070+ |
0.082+ |
|
0.005 |
-0.002 |
|
|
(0.044) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.040) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.050) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.017 |
0.018 |
|
0.051*** |
0.046** |
|
0.050*** |
0.045*** |
|
-0.016 |
-0.017 |
|
-0.026+ |
-0.027+ |
|
-0.024+ |
-0.020 |
|
0.005 |
0.003 |
|
0.020+ |
0.021+ |
|
0.010 |
0.009 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.011) |
(0.012) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.016 |
-0.008 |
|
0.015 |
-0.045 |
|
-0.135+ |
-0.114 |
|
-0.001 |
-0.053 |
|
-0.022 |
-0.004 |
|
0.062 |
0.071 |
|
0.037 |
-0.046 |
|
-0.087 |
-0.080 |
|
-0.004 |
-0.026 |
|
|
(0.076) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.068) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.070) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.078) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.118 |
-0.108 |
|
-0.023 |
-0.020 |
|
-0.127+ |
-0.126 |
|
-0.082 |
-0.067 |
|
-0.107 |
-0.091 |
|
-0.087 |
-0.065 |
|
-0.099 |
-0.106 |
|
-0.063 |
-0.061 |
|
-0.062 |
-0.043 |
|
|
(0.073) |
(0.075) |
|
(0.096) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.091) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.081) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.097) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.012 |
0.017 |
|
-0.029 |
-0.037 |
|
-0.034 |
-0.038 |
|
-0.034 |
-0.030 |
|
0.069 |
0.070 |
|
-0.060 |
-0.047 |
|
-0.080 |
-0.109+ |
|
-0.045 |
-0.033 |
|
0.007 |
-0.007 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.061) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.285** |
-0.317** |
|
-0.084 |
-0.127 |
|
-0.348*** |
-0.379*** |
|
-0.139 |
-0.079 |
|
-0.092 |
-0.131 |
|
-0.374*** |
-0.429*** |
|
-0.251 |
-0.218 |
|
-0.280** |
-0.293** |
|
-0.205 |
-0.200 |
|
|
(0.103) |
(0.109) |
|
(0.261) |
(0.267) |
|
(0.090) |
(0.089) |
|
(0.275) |
(0.269) |
|
(0.225) |
(0.204) |
|
(0.105) |
(0.111) |
|
(0.216) |
(0.210) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.105) |
|
(0.222) |
(0.229) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002+ |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.003+ |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.002+ |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.038 |
|
|
0.084+ |
|
|
0.043 |
|
|
0.071 |
|
|
-0.028 |
|
|
-0.066 |
|
|
0.079+ |
|
|
-0.007 |
|
|
-0.013 |
|
|
|
(0.038) |
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.035) |
|
|
(0.043) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
| R2 |
0.001 |
0.195 |
0.218 |
0.001 |
0.044 |
0.053 |
0.002 |
0.244 |
0.249 |
0.004 |
0.080 |
0.089 |
0.001 |
0.057 |
0.070 |
0.000 |
0.049 |
0.068 |
0.000 |
0.217 |
0.223 |
0.000 |
0.135 |
0.163 |
0.000 |
0.121 |
0.129 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch loudest |
DV: Sarpanch equal status. |
DV: Sarpanch confidence speech |
DV: Sarpanch engaged decision-making |
DV: Sarpanch active listening |
DV: Sarpanch consensus building |
DV: Sarpanch body language confidence |
DV: Sarpanch body language fearlessness |
DV: Sarpanch body language interest |
IC6 (H3.6a) table, effect of T1
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.688*** |
0.728*** |
0.736*** |
0.458*** |
0.377*** |
0.403** |
0.536*** |
0.578*** |
0.674*** |
0.417*** |
0.533*** |
0.491*** |
0.531*** |
0.650*** |
0.731*** |
0.734*** |
0.833*** |
0.826*** |
0.578*** |
0.667*** |
0.776*** |
0.771*** |
0.656*** |
0.781*** |
0.641*** |
0.645*** |
0.727*** |
|
(0.034) |
(0.089) |
(0.123) |
(0.036) |
(0.102) |
(0.147) |
(0.036) |
(0.088) |
(0.130) |
(0.036) |
(0.096) |
(0.141) |
(0.036) |
(0.101) |
(0.144) |
(0.032) |
(0.094) |
(0.126) |
(0.036) |
(0.089) |
(0.131) |
(0.030) |
(0.078) |
(0.106) |
(0.035) |
(0.084) |
(0.128) |
| T1 |
0.033 |
-0.004 |
0.011 |
-0.035 |
-0.046 |
-0.043 |
0.031 |
-0.027 |
-0.034 |
-0.026 |
-0.058 |
-0.058 |
0.008 |
-0.010 |
-0.006 |
-0.018 |
-0.029 |
-0.039 |
-0.006 |
-0.046 |
-0.019 |
0.025 |
0.010 |
-0.003 |
0.052 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
|
(0.045) |
(0.043) |
(0.046) |
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
(0.055) |
(0.049) |
(0.045) |
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
(0.055) |
(0.044) |
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
(0.046) |
(0.049) |
(0.041) |
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
(0.047) |
(0.045) |
(0.048) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.205 |
-0.173 |
|
-0.191 |
-0.180 |
|
-0.362* |
-0.369* |
|
-0.138 |
-0.076 |
|
-0.187 |
-0.150 |
|
-0.282+ |
-0.264+ |
|
-0.481** |
-0.420* |
|
-0.158 |
-0.165 |
|
-0.272 |
-0.243 |
|
|
(0.125) |
(0.131) |
|
(0.190) |
(0.196) |
|
(0.165) |
(0.169) |
|
(0.198) |
(0.197) |
|
(0.176) |
(0.181) |
|
(0.147) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.173) |
(0.175) |
|
(0.139) |
(0.140) |
|
(0.175) |
(0.180) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.051 |
0.016 |
|
0.116 |
0.122 |
|
0.133*** |
0.114+ |
|
-0.215 |
-0.198 |
|
0.054 |
0.062 |
|
0.208** |
0.217* |
|
-0.205 |
-0.226 |
|
0.073+ |
0.002 |
|
-0.251 |
-0.276 |
|
|
(0.084) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.352) |
(0.325) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.290) |
(0.293) |
|
(0.332) |
(0.257) |
|
(0.080) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.295) |
(0.300) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.300) |
(0.301) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.096 |
0.095 |
|
0.069 |
0.056 |
|
0.055 |
0.034 |
|
0.125 |
0.135 |
|
0.032 |
-0.006 |
|
0.030 |
-0.019 |
|
0.056 |
0.029 |
|
0.038 |
-0.018 |
|
0.029 |
-0.001 |
|
|
(0.089) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.115) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.100) |
|
(0.110) |
(0.120) |
|
(0.114) |
(0.118) |
|
(0.113) |
(0.113) |
|
(0.086) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.099) |
|
(0.110) |
(0.113) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.054 |
-0.009 |
|
-0.071 |
-0.043 |
|
0.059 |
0.052 |
|
-0.019 |
-0.008 |
|
-0.076 |
-0.068 |
|
-0.025 |
-0.041 |
|
0.003 |
0.027 |
|
0.061 |
0.040 |
|
-0.041 |
-0.047 |
|
|
(0.059) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.064) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.070) |
| Education above median |
|
0.204*** |
0.210*** |
|
-0.020 |
-0.023 |
|
0.173*** |
0.168** |
|
0.127* |
0.121* |
|
0.041 |
0.047 |
|
0.080+ |
0.085+ |
|
0.185*** |
0.189*** |
|
0.127** |
0.148*** |
|
0.170*** |
0.182*** |
|
|
(0.045) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.039 |
0.018 |
|
0.019 |
-0.041 |
|
0.011 |
0.005 |
|
0.045 |
0.063 |
|
0.121* |
0.136* |
|
0.095* |
0.107* |
|
0.091+ |
0.061 |
|
0.013 |
0.015 |
|
0.098* |
0.108* |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.053) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.092 |
-0.073 |
|
0.055 |
0.066 |
|
0.055 |
0.059 |
|
-0.038 |
-0.044 |
|
0.090 |
0.072 |
|
0.165 |
0.168 |
|
0.107 |
0.122 |
|
0.082 |
0.094 |
|
-0.017 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.102) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.177) |
(0.182) |
|
(0.153) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.183) |
(0.176) |
|
(0.164) |
(0.164) |
|
(0.126) |
(0.128) |
|
(0.158) |
(0.154) |
|
(0.125) |
(0.126) |
|
(0.163) |
(0.166) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.029 |
0.041 |
|
0.007 |
-0.010 |
|
0.004 |
-0.001 |
|
0.024 |
0.003 |
|
-0.012 |
-0.002 |
|
-0.041 |
-0.028 |
|
0.023 |
0.028 |
|
0.085+ |
0.082 |
|
-0.027 |
-0.039 |
|
|
(0.054) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.011 |
0.010 |
|
0.069*** |
0.061** |
|
0.047** |
0.042** |
|
-0.032+ |
-0.032+ |
|
-0.036* |
-0.029 |
|
-0.021 |
-0.015 |
|
0.005 |
0.000 |
|
0.026+ |
0.024 |
|
0.022 |
0.020 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.025 |
-0.005 |
|
0.065 |
0.043 |
|
-0.112 |
-0.098 |
|
0.012 |
-0.057 |
|
-0.029 |
-0.041 |
|
0.073 |
0.056 |
|
0.038 |
-0.011 |
|
-0.048 |
-0.063 |
|
0.003 |
-0.026 |
|
|
(0.089) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.079) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.086) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.089) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.083) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.083) |
(0.088) |
|
(0.083) |
(0.087) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.031 |
-0.038 |
|
-0.092 |
-0.093 |
|
-0.023 |
-0.020 |
|
-0.094 |
-0.064 |
|
-0.051 |
-0.025 |
|
-0.067 |
-0.048 |
|
-0.022 |
0.002 |
|
0.034 |
0.056 |
|
0.054 |
0.074 |
|
|
(0.087) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.110) |
(0.114) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.110) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.112) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.110) |
(0.111) |
|
(0.084) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.096) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.107) |
(0.111) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.002 |
-0.004 |
|
-0.038 |
-0.042 |
|
-0.035 |
-0.053 |
|
0.021 |
0.047 |
|
0.049 |
0.046 |
|
-0.090 |
-0.080 |
|
-0.026 |
-0.038 |
|
-0.037 |
-0.034 |
|
0.060 |
0.035 |
|
|
(0.058) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.074) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.070) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.075) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.066) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.056) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.069) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.175 |
-0.218 |
|
-0.227 |
-0.312 |
|
-0.327*** |
-0.391*** |
|
0.181 |
0.196 |
|
0.120 |
0.063 |
|
-0.301* |
-0.374* |
|
-0.023 |
-0.024 |
|
-0.320** |
-0.290* |
|
0.058 |
0.075 |
|
|
(0.133) |
(0.149) |
|
(0.366) |
(0.341) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.096) |
|
(0.305) |
(0.311) |
|
(0.350) |
(0.281) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.150) |
|
(0.308) |
(0.315) |
|
(0.114) |
(0.123) |
|
(0.318) |
(0.321) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.002+ |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.003 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.006* |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.061 |
|
|
0.111+ |
|
|
0.038 |
|
|
0.072 |
|
|
-0.038 |
|
|
-0.026 |
|
|
0.066 |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.051) |
| Num.Obs. |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
| R2 |
0.001 |
0.217 |
0.235 |
0.001 |
0.071 |
0.083 |
0.001 |
0.269 |
0.280 |
0.001 |
0.086 |
0.090 |
0.000 |
0.058 |
0.073 |
0.000 |
0.067 |
0.083 |
0.000 |
0.255 |
0.242 |
0.001 |
0.150 |
0.182 |
0.003 |
0.191 |
0.192 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch loudest |
DV: Sarpanch equal status. |
DV: Sarpanch confidence speech |
DV: Sarpanch engaged decision-making |
DV: Sarpanch active listening |
DV: Sarpanch consensus building |
DV: Sarpanch body language confidence |
DV: Sarpanch body language fearlessness |
DV: Sarpanch body language interest |
IC6 (H3.6a) table, effect of T2
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.687*** |
0.654*** |
0.585*** |
0.458*** |
0.461*** |
0.465** |
0.536*** |
0.604*** |
0.649*** |
0.417*** |
0.568*** |
0.742*** |
0.531*** |
0.624*** |
0.704*** |
0.734*** |
0.867*** |
0.893*** |
0.578*** |
0.631*** |
0.784*** |
0.771*** |
0.722*** |
0.721*** |
0.641*** |
0.782*** |
0.897*** |
|
(0.034) |
(0.090) |
(0.131) |
(0.036) |
(0.109) |
(0.155) |
(0.036) |
(0.094) |
(0.141) |
(0.036) |
(0.097) |
(0.144) |
(0.036) |
(0.106) |
(0.154) |
(0.032) |
(0.098) |
(0.131) |
(0.036) |
(0.097) |
(0.142) |
(0.030) |
(0.087) |
(0.115) |
(0.035) |
(0.095) |
(0.139) |
| T2 |
0.025 |
-0.024 |
-0.020 |
-0.019 |
-0.023 |
-0.028 |
0.070 |
0.030 |
0.005 |
-0.104* |
-0.156** |
-0.160** |
0.050 |
0.038 |
0.044 |
0.003 |
-0.015 |
-0.015 |
0.023 |
-0.015 |
-0.005 |
0.002 |
-0.002 |
-0.014 |
-0.009 |
-0.041 |
-0.048 |
|
(0.047) |
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
(0.050) |
(0.054) |
(0.056) |
(0.050) |
(0.048) |
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
(0.050) |
(0.054) |
(0.055) |
(0.045) |
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
(0.048) |
(0.050) |
(0.043) |
(0.043) |
(0.043) |
(0.049) |
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.056 |
-0.065 |
|
-0.170 |
-0.020 |
|
-0.245 |
-0.304 |
|
-0.212 |
-0.211 |
|
-0.052 |
-0.130 |
|
-0.058 |
-0.095 |
|
-0.515** |
-0.433+ |
|
-0.192 |
-0.246 |
|
-0.192 |
-0.226 |
|
|
(0.127) |
(0.141) |
|
(0.188) |
(0.212) |
|
(0.183) |
(0.200) |
|
(0.157) |
(0.175) |
|
(0.209) |
(0.218) |
|
(0.159) |
(0.171) |
|
(0.198) |
(0.224) |
|
(0.152) |
(0.172) |
|
(0.226) |
(0.256) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.153* |
0.148 |
|
0.037 |
0.030 |
|
0.213*** |
0.181*** |
|
0.281 |
0.216 |
|
0.214 |
0.214 |
|
0.312*** |
0.321*** |
|
-0.039 |
-0.091 |
|
0.135** |
0.116+ |
|
-0.053 |
-0.056 |
|
|
(0.077) |
(0.096) |
|
(0.286) |
(0.300) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.281) |
(0.282) |
|
(0.272) |
(0.233) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.075) |
|
(0.238) |
(0.226) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.247) |
(0.257) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.156 |
0.186+ |
|
-0.136 |
-0.101 |
|
0.211* |
0.228* |
|
-0.044 |
-0.030 |
|
0.192+ |
0.153 |
|
0.053 |
-0.011 |
|
0.197* |
0.234* |
|
0.075 |
0.069 |
|
0.151 |
0.150 |
|
|
(0.100) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.131) |
(0.131) |
|
(0.101) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.107) |
(0.114) |
|
(0.115) |
(0.117) |
|
(0.119) |
(0.117) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.136) |
(0.140) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.025 |
-0.010 |
|
-0.080 |
-0.040 |
|
0.012 |
0.004 |
|
-0.061 |
-0.037 |
|
-0.115 |
-0.120 |
|
-0.050 |
-0.067 |
|
0.054 |
0.055 |
|
0.074 |
0.053 |
|
0.014 |
0.001 |
|
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.078) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.064) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.079) |
| Education above median |
|
0.195*** |
0.233*** |
|
0.010 |
0.006 |
|
0.138** |
0.122* |
|
0.072 |
0.068 |
|
0.053 |
0.047 |
|
0.075 |
0.061 |
|
0.136** |
0.154** |
|
0.121** |
0.144** |
|
0.074 |
0.111* |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.053) |
(0.056) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.011 |
-0.019 |
|
-0.042 |
-0.053 |
|
-0.017 |
-0.017 |
|
0.069 |
0.069 |
|
0.133* |
0.149** |
|
0.064 |
0.087+ |
|
0.056 |
0.049 |
|
0.064 |
0.079+ |
|
-0.011 |
-0.006 |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.164+ |
-0.114 |
|
0.200 |
0.175 |
|
-0.021 |
0.029 |
|
-0.094 |
-0.115 |
|
-0.094 |
-0.066 |
|
-0.121 |
-0.124 |
|
0.135 |
0.122 |
|
0.001 |
0.048 |
|
-0.129 |
-0.080 |
|
|
(0.094) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.168) |
(0.185) |
|
(0.164) |
(0.169) |
|
(0.142) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.183) |
(0.190) |
|
(0.125) |
(0.136) |
|
(0.186) |
(0.203) |
|
(0.123) |
(0.132) |
|
(0.209) |
(0.231) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.057 |
0.040 |
|
-0.052 |
-0.071 |
|
0.020 |
0.016 |
|
-0.000 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.020 |
-0.017 |
|
-0.083 |
-0.044 |
|
0.045 |
0.009 |
|
0.008 |
0.032 |
|
-0.001 |
-0.018 |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.056) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.066) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.026 |
0.025 |
|
0.045* |
0.043* |
|
0.047** |
0.035* |
|
-0.008 |
-0.013 |
|
-0.028 |
-0.033+ |
|
-0.022 |
-0.014 |
|
0.011 |
0.006 |
|
0.021 |
0.020 |
|
0.002 |
-0.004 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.019) |
(0.020) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.001 |
-0.042 |
|
-0.066 |
-0.176+ |
|
-0.121 |
-0.111 |
|
0.087 |
0.074 |
|
0.020 |
0.033 |
|
0.124 |
0.129 |
|
0.121 |
0.028 |
|
0.040 |
0.040 |
|
0.071 |
0.049 |
|
|
(0.098) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.100) |
(0.105) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.079) |
(0.084) |
|
(0.103) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.102) |
|
(0.104) |
(0.113) |
|
(0.101) |
(0.107) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.097 |
-0.092 |
|
0.086 |
0.076 |
|
-0.255* |
-0.261* |
|
0.054 |
0.040 |
|
-0.227* |
-0.185 |
|
-0.120 |
-0.069 |
|
-0.112 |
-0.175+ |
|
-0.063 |
-0.073 |
|
-0.108 |
-0.105 |
|
|
(0.099) |
(0.102) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.131) |
|
(0.100) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.106) |
(0.114) |
|
(0.114) |
(0.117) |
|
(0.118) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.138) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.030 |
0.055 |
|
0.018 |
0.020 |
|
-0.025 |
-0.012 |
|
-0.028 |
-0.048 |
|
0.103 |
0.123 |
|
0.002 |
0.032 |
|
-0.121+ |
-0.158* |
|
-0.066 |
-0.032 |
|
-0.029 |
-0.038 |
|
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.062) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.080) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.377** |
-0.399** |
|
-0.258 |
-0.307 |
|
-0.330** |
-0.284* |
|
-0.385 |
-0.297 |
|
-0.052 |
-0.059 |
|
-0.383** |
-0.401** |
|
-0.191 |
-0.132 |
|
-0.361** |
-0.312* |
|
-0.170 |
-0.130 |
|
|
(0.133) |
(0.144) |
|
(0.304) |
(0.317) |
|
(0.110) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.295) |
(0.297) |
|
(0.293) |
(0.256) |
|
(0.125) |
(0.132) |
|
(0.260) |
(0.250) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.140) |
|
(0.272) |
(0.284) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.004* |
|
|
-0.004 |
|
|
-0.003 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.003) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.050 |
|
|
0.054 |
|
|
0.098+ |
|
|
0.070 |
|
|
-0.069 |
|
|
-0.136* |
|
|
0.111* |
|
|
0.026 |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
|
(0.049) |
|
|
(0.062) |
|
|
(0.054) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.058) |
|
|
(0.053) |
|
|
(0.054) |
|
|
(0.044) |
|
|
(0.056) |
| Num.Obs. |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.001 |
0.206 |
0.237 |
0.000 |
0.044 |
0.057 |
0.005 |
0.250 |
0.254 |
0.012 |
0.123 |
0.150 |
0.002 |
0.069 |
0.098 |
0.000 |
0.048 |
0.085 |
0.001 |
0.207 |
0.233 |
0.000 |
0.132 |
0.166 |
0.000 |
0.117 |
0.127 |
IC6b (H3.6b): We additionally expect this effect to be driven by
sarpanches from disadvantaged groups.
- IC6b is assessed by running the same model, plus an interaction
between treatment (bundling T1 and T2 versus control) and a binary
indicator of the disadvantaged status of sarpanch (with sarpanches from
disadvantaged groups primarily either understood as women, Scheduled
castes or both in separate models). We also control for the potential
presence of a sarpanch relative during the interview (“the interview”
being here understood as the group interview), both separately and in
interaction with the gender of the sarpanch. Cluster-corrected standard
errors will be used at the administrative block level in both
cases.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2. We also
include the series of individual and village level controls presented in
G2.
- The same measures are used as in IC6a.
- Deviation 1: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Precision 1: For the first six measures, we code
sarpanches who did not speak at all as not exihibiting the measures of
confidence.
- Precision 2: For each outcome, we run one
regression interacting a female indicator with treatment status, as well
as a regression interacting an indicator for SC with treatment status.
| |
DV: Sarpanch loudest |
DV: Sarpanch equal status. |
DV: Sarpanch confidence speech |
DV: Sarpanch engaged decision-making |
DV: Sarpanch active listening |
DV: Sarpanch consensus building |
DV: Sarpanch body language confidence |
DV: Sarpanch body language fearlessness |
DV: Sarpanch body language interest |
IC6b (H3.6b) table, grouping T1/T2 together, Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.899*** |
0.711*** |
0.672*** |
0.478*** |
0.405*** |
0.464*** |
0.841*** |
0.594*** |
0.614*** |
0.580*** |
0.590*** |
0.637*** |
0.580*** |
0.578*** |
0.596*** |
0.754*** |
0.838*** |
0.832*** |
0.841*** |
0.671*** |
0.750*** |
0.899*** |
0.665*** |
0.694*** |
0.884*** |
0.768*** |
0.823*** |
|
(0.037) |
(0.077) |
(0.109) |
(0.061) |
(0.099) |
(0.130) |
(0.044) |
(0.079) |
(0.110) |
(0.060) |
(0.094) |
(0.129) |
(0.060) |
(0.098) |
(0.130) |
(0.052) |
(0.086) |
(0.112) |
(0.044) |
(0.082) |
(0.117) |
(0.037) |
(0.072) |
(0.095) |
(0.039) |
(0.077) |
(0.115) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.001 |
-0.028 |
-0.011 |
0.003 |
-0.004 |
-0.031 |
-0.041 |
-0.073 |
-0.081 |
-0.109 |
-0.143+ |
-0.138+ |
0.074 |
0.063 |
0.043 |
0.025 |
0.018 |
-0.012 |
-0.051 |
-0.084 |
-0.056 |
0.020 |
0.019 |
-0.002 |
-0.100* |
-0.113* |
-0.106+ |
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
(0.049) |
(0.071) |
(0.075) |
(0.077) |
(0.053) |
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
(0.070) |
(0.075) |
(0.079) |
(0.069) |
(0.073) |
(0.074) |
(0.061) |
(0.061) |
(0.059) |
(0.054) |
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
(0.042) |
(0.044) |
(0.041) |
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
(0.056) |
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.329*** |
-0.178 |
-0.178 |
-0.031 |
-0.178 |
-0.133 |
-0.475*** |
-0.304* |
-0.335* |
-0.255*** |
-0.218 |
-0.159 |
-0.076 |
-0.092 |
-0.174 |
-0.030 |
-0.107 |
-0.171 |
-0.410*** |
-0.446** |
-0.339* |
-0.199*** |
-0.079 |
-0.118 |
-0.380*** |
-0.298+ |
-0.295+ |
|
(0.058) |
(0.115) |
(0.122) |
(0.075) |
(0.159) |
(0.172) |
(0.062) |
(0.141) |
(0.151) |
(0.073) |
(0.159) |
(0.171) |
(0.075) |
(0.165) |
(0.167) |
(0.066) |
(0.139) |
(0.145) |
(0.063) |
(0.153) |
(0.165) |
(0.055) |
(0.122) |
(0.133) |
(0.060) |
(0.166) |
(0.179) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
0.002 |
0.025 |
0.014 |
-0.060 |
-0.049 |
-0.006 |
0.087 |
0.120 |
0.108 |
0.043 |
0.074 |
0.059 |
-0.096 |
-0.087 |
-0.049 |
-0.064 |
-0.070 |
-0.031 |
0.042 |
0.091 |
0.076 |
-0.044 |
-0.025 |
-0.008 |
0.162* |
0.175* |
0.163* |
|
(0.070) |
(0.071) |
(0.076) |
(0.090) |
(0.095) |
(0.098) |
(0.076) |
(0.077) |
(0.080) |
(0.087) |
(0.093) |
(0.097) |
(0.089) |
(0.094) |
(0.096) |
(0.079) |
(0.081) |
(0.081) |
(0.077) |
(0.079) |
(0.083) |
(0.067) |
(0.070) |
(0.069) |
(0.075) |
(0.078) |
(0.082) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.133* |
0.120+ |
|
-0.104 |
-0.122 |
|
0.192*** |
0.184*** |
|
0.110 |
0.073 |
|
0.225 |
0.226 |
|
0.248*** |
0.255*** |
|
0.010 |
-0.032 |
|
0.107*** |
0.097+ |
|
-0.015 |
-0.016 |
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.255) |
(0.255) |
|
(0.053) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.267) |
(0.258) |
|
(0.198) |
(0.177) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.211) |
(0.201) |
|
(0.028) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.221) |
(0.226) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.150* |
0.153* |
|
-0.013 |
-0.021 |
|
0.146+ |
0.140+ |
|
0.051 |
0.058 |
|
0.090 |
0.072 |
|
0.057 |
0.018 |
|
0.145* |
0.139+ |
|
0.085 |
0.053 |
|
0.121 |
0.099 |
|
|
(0.075) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.100) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.089) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.095) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.084) |
(0.083) |
|
(0.097) |
(0.100) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.024 |
0.002 |
|
-0.042 |
-0.018 |
|
0.070 |
0.064 |
|
-0.033 |
-0.017 |
|
-0.070 |
-0.060 |
|
-0.001 |
-0.019 |
|
0.051 |
0.069 |
|
0.079+ |
0.056 |
|
0.001 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.060) |
| Education above median |
|
0.186*** |
0.212*** |
|
-0.009 |
-0.010 |
|
0.141*** |
0.137** |
|
0.087* |
0.080+ |
|
0.030 |
0.028 |
|
0.052 |
0.049 |
|
0.151*** |
0.158*** |
|
0.128*** |
0.143*** |
|
0.108** |
0.134** |
|
|
(0.037) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.022 |
0.006 |
|
0.012 |
-0.025 |
|
0.040 |
0.040 |
|
0.047 |
0.054 |
|
0.125** |
0.143** |
|
0.071+ |
0.091* |
|
0.096* |
0.076+ |
|
0.038 |
0.049 |
|
0.050 |
0.064 |
|
|
(0.038) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.040) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.036) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.103 |
-0.056 |
|
0.138 |
0.138 |
|
-0.039 |
-0.006 |
|
-0.020 |
-0.039 |
|
0.042 |
0.084 |
|
0.024 |
0.051 |
|
0.059 |
0.049 |
|
0.038 |
0.054 |
|
-0.057 |
-0.028 |
|
|
(0.084) |
(0.086) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.142) |
|
(0.117) |
(0.124) |
|
(0.128) |
(0.134) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.134) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.109) |
|
(0.133) |
(0.140) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.143) |
(0.150) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.043 |
0.051 |
|
-0.026 |
-0.036 |
|
0.009 |
0.014 |
|
0.021 |
0.005 |
|
-0.006 |
0.004 |
|
-0.066 |
-0.040 |
|
0.045 |
0.040 |
|
0.070+ |
0.082+ |
|
0.002 |
-0.003 |
|
|
(0.044) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.040) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.049) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.016 |
0.018 |
|
0.051*** |
0.046** |
|
0.050*** |
0.045** |
|
-0.017 |
-0.017 |
|
-0.026+ |
-0.027+ |
|
-0.023+ |
-0.020 |
|
0.005 |
0.003 |
|
0.020+ |
0.021+ |
|
0.010 |
0.008 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.011) |
(0.012) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.015) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.017 |
-0.008 |
|
0.014 |
-0.045 |
|
-0.133+ |
-0.114 |
|
0.000 |
-0.053 |
|
-0.024 |
-0.004 |
|
0.061 |
0.071 |
|
0.038 |
-0.046 |
|
-0.087 |
-0.080 |
|
-0.001 |
-0.025 |
|
|
(0.076) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.070) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.078) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.119 |
-0.109 |
|
-0.020 |
-0.020 |
|
-0.134+ |
-0.131 |
|
-0.086 |
-0.069 |
|
-0.102 |
-0.088 |
|
-0.083 |
-0.064 |
|
-0.104 |
-0.109 |
|
-0.062 |
-0.061 |
|
-0.072 |
-0.050 |
|
|
(0.073) |
(0.075) |
|
(0.096) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.088) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.091) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.080) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.095) |
(0.098) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.012 |
0.017 |
|
-0.028 |
-0.037 |
|
-0.037 |
-0.040 |
|
-0.037 |
-0.031 |
|
0.071 |
0.071 |
|
-0.058 |
-0.047 |
|
-0.083 |
-0.110+ |
|
-0.044 |
-0.032 |
|
0.002 |
-0.010 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.061) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.282** |
-0.315** |
|
-0.088 |
-0.127 |
|
-0.338*** |
-0.368*** |
|
-0.133 |
-0.073 |
|
-0.100 |
-0.136 |
|
-0.380*** |
-0.432*** |
|
-0.243 |
-0.210 |
|
-0.282** |
-0.294** |
|
-0.190 |
-0.183 |
|
|
(0.104) |
(0.110) |
|
(0.267) |
(0.267) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.279) |
(0.272) |
|
(0.218) |
(0.201) |
|
(0.105) |
(0.112) |
|
(0.225) |
(0.218) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.105) |
|
(0.239) |
(0.245) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002+ |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.003+ |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.002+ |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.038 |
|
|
0.084+ |
|
|
0.043 |
|
|
0.071 |
|
|
-0.028 |
|
|
-0.066 |
|
|
0.079+ |
|
|
-0.007 |
|
|
-0.013 |
|
|
|
(0.038) |
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.035) |
|
|
(0.043) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
605 |
549 |
506 |
| R2 |
0.126 |
0.195 |
0.218 |
0.007 |
0.045 |
0.053 |
0.173 |
0.246 |
0.251 |
0.056 |
0.081 |
0.090 |
0.022 |
0.059 |
0.070 |
0.008 |
0.050 |
0.068 |
0.145 |
0.219 |
0.224 |
0.076 |
0.135 |
0.163 |
0.083 |
0.127 |
0.134 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch loudest |
DV: Sarpanch equal status. |
DV: Sarpanch confidence speech |
DV: Sarpanch engaged decision-making |
DV: Sarpanch active listening |
DV: Sarpanch consensus building |
DV: Sarpanch body language confidence |
DV: Sarpanch body language fearlessness |
DV: Sarpanch body language interest |
IC6b (H3.6b) table, effect of T1, Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.899*** |
0.725*** |
0.731*** |
0.478*** |
0.329** |
0.348* |
0.841*** |
0.609*** |
0.710*** |
0.580*** |
0.586*** |
0.551*** |
0.580*** |
0.618*** |
0.732*** |
0.754*** |
0.798*** |
0.816*** |
0.841*** |
0.682*** |
0.802*** |
0.899*** |
0.641*** |
0.782*** |
0.884*** |
0.698*** |
0.794*** |
|
(0.037) |
(0.091) |
(0.130) |
(0.061) |
(0.112) |
(0.156) |
(0.044) |
(0.089) |
(0.130) |
(0.060) |
(0.106) |
(0.151) |
(0.060) |
(0.111) |
(0.154) |
(0.052) |
(0.099) |
(0.133) |
(0.044) |
(0.094) |
(0.138) |
(0.037) |
(0.082) |
(0.112) |
(0.039) |
(0.087) |
(0.133) |
| T1 |
0.014 |
0.001 |
0.017 |
0.027 |
0.025 |
0.025 |
-0.038 |
-0.072 |
-0.079 |
-0.085 |
-0.135 |
-0.133 |
0.058 |
0.036 |
-0.008 |
0.027 |
0.022 |
-0.026 |
-0.027 |
-0.068 |
-0.052 |
0.036 |
0.033 |
-0.004 |
-0.038 |
-0.061 |
-0.065 |
|
(0.047) |
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
(0.080) |
(0.084) |
(0.086) |
(0.061) |
(0.060) |
(0.061) |
(0.080) |
(0.085) |
(0.089) |
(0.078) |
(0.082) |
(0.084) |
(0.068) |
(0.067) |
(0.067) |
(0.060) |
(0.062) |
(0.065) |
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
(0.046) |
(0.054) |
(0.058) |
(0.063) |
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.329*** |
-0.200 |
-0.168 |
-0.031 |
-0.123 |
-0.114 |
-0.475*** |
-0.406* |
-0.413* |
-0.255*** |
-0.214 |
-0.148 |
-0.076 |
-0.142 |
-0.152 |
-0.030 |
-0.232 |
-0.252 |
-0.410*** |
-0.502** |
-0.452* |
-0.199*** |
-0.135 |
-0.167 |
-0.380*** |
-0.347+ |
-0.322 |
|
(0.058) |
(0.131) |
(0.135) |
(0.075) |
(0.200) |
(0.206) |
(0.062) |
(0.172) |
(0.176) |
(0.073) |
(0.209) |
(0.208) |
(0.075) |
(0.187) |
(0.193) |
(0.066) |
(0.159) |
(0.163) |
(0.063) |
(0.178) |
(0.178) |
(0.055) |
(0.152) |
(0.154) |
(0.060) |
(0.189) |
(0.196) |
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
-0.002 |
-0.009 |
-0.010 |
-0.111 |
-0.117 |
-0.116 |
0.068 |
0.075 |
0.076 |
0.075 |
0.129 |
0.126 |
-0.094 |
-0.077 |
0.002 |
-0.081 |
-0.085 |
-0.021 |
-0.008 |
0.036 |
0.055 |
-0.041 |
-0.038 |
0.003 |
0.114 |
0.129 |
0.138 |
|
(0.079) |
(0.081) |
(0.086) |
(0.102) |
(0.108) |
(0.112) |
(0.087) |
(0.088) |
(0.091) |
(0.100) |
(0.106) |
(0.111) |
(0.101) |
(0.107) |
(0.111) |
(0.090) |
(0.092) |
(0.094) |
(0.087) |
(0.090) |
(0.096) |
(0.074) |
(0.077) |
(0.078) |
(0.084) |
(0.088) |
(0.093) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.052 |
0.018 |
|
0.134 |
0.142 |
|
0.122** |
0.101+ |
|
-0.234 |
-0.220 |
|
0.066 |
0.061 |
|
0.221* |
0.221* |
|
-0.211 |
-0.236 |
|
0.079+ |
0.002 |
|
-0.270 |
-0.300 |
|
|
(0.085) |
(0.109) |
|
(0.375) |
(0.347) |
|
(0.037) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.280) |
(0.287) |
|
(0.328) |
(0.257) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.102) |
|
(0.299) |
(0.306) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.311) |
(0.314) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.096 |
0.095 |
|
0.065 |
0.056 |
|
0.058 |
0.034 |
|
0.129 |
0.136 |
|
0.030 |
-0.006 |
|
0.027 |
-0.019 |
|
0.057 |
0.029 |
|
0.036 |
-0.018 |
|
0.033 |
-0.001 |
|
|
(0.089) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.114) |
(0.118) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.100) |
|
(0.110) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.115) |
(0.118) |
|
(0.112) |
(0.113) |
|
(0.086) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.099) |
|
(0.112) |
(0.115) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.054 |
-0.009 |
|
-0.071 |
-0.042 |
|
0.058 |
0.051 |
|
-0.019 |
-0.009 |
|
-0.076 |
-0.068 |
|
-0.025 |
-0.041 |
|
0.003 |
0.027 |
|
0.061 |
0.040 |
|
-0.042 |
-0.048 |
|
|
(0.059) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.064) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.070) |
| Education above median |
|
0.204*** |
0.210*** |
|
-0.018 |
-0.022 |
|
0.172*** |
0.167** |
|
0.125* |
0.120* |
|
0.043 |
0.047 |
|
0.082+ |
0.085+ |
|
0.184*** |
0.188*** |
|
0.128** |
0.148*** |
|
0.168*** |
0.181*** |
|
|
(0.045) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.052) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.039 |
0.017 |
|
0.014 |
-0.044 |
|
0.014 |
0.007 |
|
0.049 |
0.067 |
|
0.118* |
0.136* |
|
0.091+ |
0.106* |
|
0.093+ |
0.063 |
|
0.012 |
0.015 |
|
0.103* |
0.112* |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.053) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.092 |
-0.073 |
|
0.057 |
0.067 |
|
0.054 |
0.058 |
|
-0.040 |
-0.046 |
|
0.090 |
0.072 |
|
0.166 |
0.168 |
|
0.107 |
0.121 |
|
0.083 |
0.094 |
|
-0.018 |
-0.015 |
|
|
(0.102) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.178) |
(0.183) |
|
(0.152) |
(0.151) |
|
(0.187) |
(0.179) |
|
(0.162) |
(0.164) |
|
(0.125) |
(0.128) |
|
(0.158) |
(0.153) |
|
(0.125) |
(0.126) |
|
(0.166) |
(0.168) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.029 |
0.041 |
|
0.010 |
-0.008 |
|
0.002 |
-0.002 |
|
0.021 |
0.001 |
|
-0.010 |
-0.002 |
|
-0.039 |
-0.027 |
|
0.022 |
0.027 |
|
0.086+ |
0.082 |
|
-0.030 |
-0.041 |
|
|
(0.054) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.011 |
0.010 |
|
0.070*** |
0.062** |
|
0.046** |
0.041* |
|
-0.033+ |
-0.032+ |
|
-0.035+ |
-0.029 |
|
-0.020 |
-0.015 |
|
0.005 |
0.000 |
|
0.026+ |
0.024 |
|
0.020 |
0.019 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.024 |
-0.005 |
|
0.060 |
0.040 |
|
-0.109 |
-0.095 |
|
0.018 |
-0.053 |
|
-0.032 |
-0.041 |
|
0.069 |
0.055 |
|
0.039 |
-0.009 |
|
-0.050 |
-0.063 |
|
0.008 |
-0.022 |
|
|
(0.089) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.078) |
(0.088) |
|
(0.086) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.089) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.083) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.084) |
(0.089) |
|
(0.082) |
(0.086) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.030 |
-0.037 |
|
-0.082 |
-0.086 |
|
-0.030 |
-0.024 |
|
-0.105 |
-0.072 |
|
-0.044 |
-0.025 |
|
-0.059 |
-0.046 |
|
-0.025 |
-0.002 |
|
0.037 |
0.055 |
|
0.043 |
0.066 |
|
|
(0.087) |
(0.089) |
|
(0.110) |
(0.114) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.110) |
(0.119) |
|
(0.113) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.108) |
(0.110) |
|
(0.085) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.096) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.109) |
(0.113) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.003 |
-0.004 |
|
-0.033 |
-0.039 |
|
-0.038 |
-0.056 |
|
0.016 |
0.043 |
|
0.052 |
0.046 |
|
-0.086 |
-0.080 |
|
-0.027 |
-0.040 |
|
-0.036 |
-0.034 |
|
0.055 |
0.031 |
|
|
(0.058) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.075) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.066) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.056) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.069) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.176 |
-0.219 |
|
-0.243 |
-0.330 |
|
-0.317*** |
-0.379*** |
|
0.198 |
0.215 |
|
0.110 |
0.064 |
|
-0.312* |
-0.377* |
|
-0.019 |
-0.016 |
|
-0.325** |
-0.289* |
|
0.075 |
0.096 |
|
|
(0.134) |
(0.150) |
|
(0.388) |
(0.361) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.295) |
(0.305) |
|
(0.345) |
(0.282) |
|
(0.142) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.311) |
(0.321) |
|
(0.115) |
(0.124) |
|
(0.328) |
(0.334) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.002+ |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.003 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.006* |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.061 |
|
|
0.112+ |
|
|
0.037 |
|
|
0.071 |
|
|
-0.038 |
|
|
-0.026 |
|
|
0.066 |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.053) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.052) |
| Num.Obs. |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
| R2 |
0.126 |
0.218 |
0.235 |
0.012 |
0.074 |
0.086 |
0.186 |
0.271 |
0.281 |
0.047 |
0.090 |
0.093 |
0.017 |
0.060 |
0.073 |
0.009 |
0.070 |
0.083 |
0.167 |
0.256 |
0.242 |
0.070 |
0.150 |
0.182 |
0.115 |
0.195 |
0.197 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch loudest |
DV: Sarpanch equal status. |
DV: Sarpanch confidence speech |
DV: Sarpanch engaged decision-making |
DV: Sarpanch active listening |
DV: Sarpanch consensus building |
DV: Sarpanch body language confidence |
DV: Sarpanch body language fearlessness |
DV: Sarpanch body language interest |
IC6b (H3.6b) table, effect of T2, gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.899*** |
0.672*** |
0.600*** |
0.478*** |
0.463*** |
0.502** |
0.841*** |
0.660*** |
0.710*** |
0.580*** |
0.571*** |
0.734*** |
0.580*** |
0.595*** |
0.671*** |
0.754*** |
0.850*** |
0.881*** |
0.841*** |
0.681*** |
0.828*** |
0.899*** |
0.714*** |
0.712*** |
0.884*** |
0.855*** |
0.978*** |
|
(0.037) |
(0.093) |
(0.137) |
(0.061) |
(0.115) |
(0.161) |
(0.044) |
(0.094) |
(0.140) |
(0.060) |
(0.106) |
(0.156) |
(0.060) |
(0.112) |
(0.160) |
(0.052) |
(0.100) |
(0.133) |
(0.044) |
(0.097) |
(0.145) |
(0.037) |
(0.089) |
(0.119) |
(0.039) |
(0.091) |
(0.142) |
| T2 |
-0.016 |
-0.056 |
-0.041 |
-0.021 |
-0.026 |
-0.081 |
-0.043 |
-0.068 |
-0.084 |
-0.133+ |
-0.161+ |
-0.148+ |
0.091 |
0.088 |
0.092 |
0.023 |
0.014 |
0.002 |
-0.075 |
-0.105 |
-0.070 |
0.006 |
0.012 |
-0.001 |
-0.161** |
-0.169** |
-0.165* |
|
(0.050) |
(0.054) |
(0.059) |
(0.080) |
(0.085) |
(0.088) |
(0.061) |
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
(0.079) |
(0.084) |
(0.089) |
(0.077) |
(0.082) |
(0.083) |
(0.068) |
(0.071) |
(0.068) |
(0.062) |
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
(0.046) |
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
(0.068) |
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.329*** |
-0.085 |
-0.081 |
-0.031 |
-0.173 |
-0.061 |
-0.475*** |
-0.331+ |
-0.373+ |
-0.255*** |
-0.216 |
-0.202 |
-0.076 |
-0.008 |
-0.093 |
-0.030 |
-0.033 |
-0.081 |
-0.410*** |
-0.593** |
-0.483* |
-0.199*** |
-0.179 |
-0.235 |
-0.380*** |
-0.303 |
-0.318 |
|
(0.058) |
(0.132) |
(0.145) |
(0.075) |
(0.199) |
(0.220) |
(0.062) |
(0.186) |
(0.201) |
(0.073) |
(0.170) |
(0.184) |
(0.075) |
(0.215) |
(0.222) |
(0.066) |
(0.170) |
(0.178) |
(0.063) |
(0.199) |
(0.223) |
(0.055) |
(0.160) |
(0.177) |
(0.060) |
(0.233) |
(0.266) |
| T2:Sarpanch woman |
0.004 |
0.056 |
0.035 |
-0.003 |
0.005 |
0.090 |
0.110 |
0.168+ |
0.150 |
0.000 |
0.008 |
-0.020 |
-0.095 |
-0.086 |
-0.081 |
-0.045 |
-0.050 |
-0.030 |
0.096 |
0.153 |
0.108 |
-0.051 |
-0.024 |
-0.023 |
0.205* |
0.218* |
0.198+ |
|
(0.083) |
(0.085) |
(0.090) |
(0.104) |
(0.110) |
(0.113) |
(0.089) |
(0.090) |
(0.094) |
(0.098) |
(0.104) |
(0.109) |
(0.102) |
(0.107) |
(0.110) |
(0.091) |
(0.094) |
(0.094) |
(0.091) |
(0.094) |
(0.098) |
(0.079) |
(0.082) |
(0.082) |
(0.090) |
(0.095) |
(0.101) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.151+ |
0.146 |
|
0.037 |
0.025 |
|
0.208** |
0.174** |
|
0.281 |
0.217 |
|
0.216 |
0.218 |
|
0.313*** |
0.323*** |
|
-0.044 |
-0.097 |
|
0.136** |
0.117+ |
|
-0.060 |
-0.066 |
|
|
(0.082) |
(0.099) |
|
(0.286) |
(0.285) |
|
(0.064) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.283) |
(0.280) |
|
(0.263) |
(0.225) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.073) |
|
(0.257) |
(0.242) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.066) |
|
(0.274) |
(0.284) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.158 |
0.187+ |
|
-0.136 |
-0.098 |
|
0.217* |
0.233* |
|
-0.043 |
-0.031 |
|
0.189 |
0.151 |
|
0.051 |
-0.012 |
|
0.203* |
0.237* |
|
0.074 |
0.068 |
|
0.159 |
0.156 |
|
|
(0.100) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.131) |
(0.132) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.107) |
(0.114) |
|
(0.116) |
(0.118) |
|
(0.119) |
(0.117) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.139) |
(0.142) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.026 |
-0.011 |
|
-0.080 |
-0.041 |
|
0.010 |
0.002 |
|
-0.061 |
-0.036 |
|
-0.114 |
-0.119 |
|
-0.050 |
-0.067 |
|
0.053 |
0.053 |
|
0.074 |
0.054 |
|
0.012 |
-0.002 |
|
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.078) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.070) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.066) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.078) |
| Education above median |
|
0.196*** |
0.234*** |
|
0.010 |
0.007 |
|
0.140** |
0.124* |
|
0.072 |
0.068 |
|
0.052 |
0.046 |
|
0.074 |
0.061 |
|
0.138** |
0.156** |
|
0.121** |
0.144** |
|
0.076 |
0.113* |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.053) |
(0.056) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.009 |
-0.018 |
|
-0.042 |
-0.051 |
|
-0.012 |
-0.014 |
|
0.069 |
0.069 |
|
0.131* |
0.147** |
|
0.063 |
0.086+ |
|
0.060 |
0.051 |
|
0.063 |
0.078+ |
|
-0.005 |
-0.002 |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.164+ |
-0.116 |
|
0.200 |
0.172 |
|
-0.022 |
0.024 |
|
-0.095 |
-0.114 |
|
-0.094 |
-0.064 |
|
-0.121 |
-0.123 |
|
0.134 |
0.118 |
|
0.001 |
0.049 |
|
-0.131 |
-0.087 |
|
|
(0.096) |
(0.100) |
|
(0.168) |
(0.185) |
|
(0.162) |
(0.168) |
|
(0.142) |
(0.151) |
|
(0.184) |
(0.190) |
|
(0.126) |
(0.137) |
|
(0.184) |
(0.201) |
|
(0.123) |
(0.132) |
|
(0.212) |
(0.235) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.057 |
0.040 |
|
-0.052 |
-0.071 |
|
0.020 |
0.016 |
|
-0.000 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.019 |
-0.017 |
|
-0.083 |
-0.044 |
|
0.045 |
0.010 |
|
0.008 |
0.032 |
|
-0.002 |
-0.017 |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.056) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.065) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.026 |
0.025 |
|
0.045* |
0.043* |
|
0.047** |
0.035* |
|
-0.008 |
-0.013 |
|
-0.029 |
-0.033+ |
|
-0.022 |
-0.014 |
|
0.012 |
0.006 |
|
0.021 |
0.020 |
|
0.003 |
-0.003 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.019) |
(0.020) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.019) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.002 |
-0.043 |
|
-0.066 |
-0.180+ |
|
-0.123 |
-0.117 |
|
0.086 |
0.074 |
|
0.021 |
0.037 |
|
0.124 |
0.130 |
|
0.119 |
0.023 |
|
0.040 |
0.041 |
|
0.068 |
0.040 |
|
|
(0.098) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.100) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.079) |
(0.085) |
|
(0.103) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.103) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.105) |
(0.113) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.106) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.100 |
-0.094 |
|
0.086 |
0.071 |
|
-0.265** |
-0.269* |
|
0.053 |
0.041 |
|
-0.222+ |
-0.181 |
|
-0.117 |
-0.067 |
|
-0.121 |
-0.181+ |
|
-0.062 |
-0.071 |
|
-0.121 |
-0.115 |
|
|
(0.099) |
(0.102) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.131) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.105) |
|
(0.107) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.116) |
(0.118) |
|
(0.118) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.094) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.136) |
(0.140) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.029 |
0.055 |
|
0.018 |
0.019 |
|
-0.029 |
-0.013 |
|
-0.028 |
-0.048 |
|
0.106 |
0.123 |
|
0.003 |
0.032 |
|
-0.125+ |
-0.159* |
|
-0.065 |
-0.032 |
|
-0.035 |
-0.040 |
|
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.062) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.079) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.374** |
-0.397** |
|
-0.257 |
-0.301 |
|
-0.321** |
-0.273* |
|
-0.384 |
-0.298 |
|
-0.057 |
-0.064 |
|
-0.386** |
-0.403** |
|
-0.182 |
-0.125 |
|
-0.363** |
-0.313* |
|
-0.157 |
-0.116 |
|
|
(0.137) |
(0.146) |
|
(0.304) |
(0.303) |
|
(0.116) |
(0.118) |
|
(0.297) |
(0.296) |
|
(0.285) |
(0.249) |
|
(0.123) |
(0.131) |
|
(0.277) |
(0.265) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.140) |
|
(0.297) |
(0.309) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002* |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.003 |
|
|
-0.004* |
|
|
-0.004 |
|
|
-0.003 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.050 |
|
|
0.054 |
|
|
0.099+ |
|
|
0.070 |
|
|
-0.069 |
|
|
-0.136* |
|
|
0.112* |
|
|
0.026 |
|
|
0.023 |
|
|
|
(0.050) |
|
|
(0.061) |
|
|
(0.054) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.053) |
|
|
(0.054) |
|
|
(0.044) |
|
|
(0.056) |
| Num.Obs. |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.123 |
0.207 |
0.237 |
0.001 |
0.044 |
0.059 |
0.178 |
0.257 |
0.259 |
0.079 |
0.123 |
0.150 |
0.020 |
0.071 |
0.099 |
0.004 |
0.049 |
0.085 |
0.131 |
0.213 |
0.236 |
0.071 |
0.132 |
0.166 |
0.088 |
0.129 |
0.137 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch loudest |
DV: Sarpanch equal status. |
DV: Sarpanch confidence speech |
DV: Sarpanch engaged decision-making |
DV: Sarpanch active listening |
DV: Sarpanch consensus building |
DV: Sarpanch body language confidence |
DV: Sarpanch body language fearlessness |
DV: Sarpanch body language interest |
IC6b (H3.6b) table, grouping T1/T2 together, Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.647*** |
0.667*** |
0.630*** |
0.459*** |
0.417*** |
0.453*** |
0.549*** |
0.535*** |
0.551*** |
0.376*** |
0.510*** |
0.559*** |
0.534*** |
0.614*** |
0.612*** |
0.759*** |
0.887*** |
0.876*** |
0.534*** |
0.602*** |
0.678*** |
0.752*** |
0.656*** |
0.669*** |
0.624*** |
0.682*** |
0.734*** |
|
(0.042) |
(0.077) |
(0.103) |
(0.043) |
(0.089) |
(0.123) |
(0.043) |
(0.079) |
(0.113) |
(0.042) |
(0.083) |
(0.119) |
(0.043) |
(0.089) |
(0.122) |
(0.037) |
(0.082) |
(0.109) |
(0.043) |
(0.080) |
(0.113) |
(0.038) |
(0.071) |
(0.091) |
(0.042) |
(0.079) |
(0.113) |
| Discussion rules |
0.076 |
0.034 |
0.040 |
-0.013 |
-0.018 |
-0.017 |
0.042 |
0.004 |
-0.008 |
-0.007 |
-0.034 |
-0.043 |
0.021 |
0.016 |
0.025 |
-0.033 |
-0.047 |
-0.064 |
0.057 |
0.009 |
0.029 |
0.051 |
0.033 |
0.030 |
0.026 |
-0.002 |
-0.003 |
|
(0.050) |
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
(0.053) |
(0.053) |
(0.056) |
(0.053) |
(0.047) |
(0.051) |
(0.051) |
(0.052) |
(0.055) |
(0.053) |
(0.054) |
(0.056) |
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
(0.053) |
(0.048) |
(0.052) |
(0.045) |
(0.045) |
(0.045) |
(0.051) |
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Sarpanch SC |
0.133+ |
0.268** |
0.257** |
-0.001 |
0.030 |
0.022 |
-0.040 |
0.152 |
0.156 |
0.133+ |
0.211+ |
0.199+ |
-0.008 |
0.109 |
0.101 |
-0.081 |
0.001 |
-0.062 |
0.144+ |
0.235* |
0.232* |
0.062 |
0.159 |
0.143 |
0.054 |
0.127 |
0.103 |
|
(0.069) |
(0.096) |
(0.098) |
(0.078) |
(0.125) |
(0.126) |
(0.079) |
(0.099) |
(0.103) |
(0.078) |
(0.113) |
(0.118) |
(0.079) |
(0.115) |
(0.118) |
(0.072) |
(0.112) |
(0.113) |
(0.075) |
(0.093) |
(0.098) |
(0.063) |
(0.099) |
(0.099) |
(0.074) |
(0.117) |
(0.122) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch SC |
-0.140+ |
-0.168* |
-0.148+ |
-0.043 |
-0.059 |
-0.062 |
0.033 |
-0.013 |
-0.024 |
-0.173+ |
-0.230* |
-0.203* |
0.016 |
-0.024 |
-0.042 |
0.085 |
0.082 |
0.115 |
-0.151+ |
-0.131 |
-0.134 |
-0.105 |
-0.104 |
-0.128 |
-0.003 |
-0.015 |
-0.008 |
|
(0.083) |
(0.085) |
(0.087) |
(0.094) |
(0.104) |
(0.107) |
(0.094) |
(0.089) |
(0.092) |
(0.093) |
(0.097) |
(0.101) |
(0.094) |
(0.101) |
(0.104) |
(0.086) |
(0.091) |
(0.092) |
(0.091) |
(0.089) |
(0.092) |
(0.077) |
(0.078) |
(0.079) |
(0.089) |
(0.093) |
(0.097) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.162 |
-0.170 |
|
-0.214 |
-0.138 |
|
-0.219+ |
-0.261+ |
|
-0.168 |
-0.122 |
|
-0.154 |
-0.209 |
|
-0.157 |
-0.191 |
|
-0.382* |
-0.289+ |
|
-0.097 |
-0.126 |
|
-0.174 |
-0.182 |
|
|
(0.106) |
(0.114) |
|
(0.143) |
(0.159) |
|
(0.132) |
(0.144) |
|
(0.148) |
(0.160) |
|
(0.151) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.124) |
(0.132) |
|
(0.150) |
(0.163) |
|
(0.108) |
(0.123) |
|
(0.154) |
(0.164) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.125+ |
0.114 |
|
-0.111 |
-0.125 |
|
0.201*** |
0.193*** |
|
0.102 |
0.070 |
|
0.216 |
0.219 |
|
0.248*** |
0.257*** |
|
0.009 |
-0.031 |
|
0.099** |
0.091 |
|
-0.003 |
-0.001 |
|
|
(0.069) |
(0.079) |
|
(0.246) |
(0.252) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.259) |
(0.248) |
|
(0.209) |
(0.186) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.197) |
(0.187) |
|
(0.036) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.203) |
(0.209) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.023 |
0.003 |
|
-0.042 |
-0.018 |
|
0.070 |
0.065 |
|
-0.032 |
-0.016 |
|
-0.070 |
-0.060 |
|
-0.001 |
-0.019 |
|
0.051 |
0.070 |
|
0.079+ |
0.057 |
|
0.002 |
-0.011 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
| Education above median |
|
0.186*** |
0.212*** |
|
-0.009 |
-0.011 |
|
0.141*** |
0.137** |
|
0.087* |
0.079+ |
|
0.030 |
0.028 |
|
0.052 |
0.049 |
|
0.150*** |
0.158*** |
|
0.128*** |
0.143*** |
|
0.109** |
0.134** |
|
|
(0.037) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.034) |
(0.035) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.020 |
0.003 |
|
0.013 |
-0.025 |
|
0.036 |
0.037 |
|
0.044 |
0.049 |
|
0.128** |
0.143** |
|
0.073+ |
0.094* |
|
0.093* |
0.072+ |
|
0.038 |
0.047 |
|
0.045 |
0.060 |
|
|
(0.038) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.040) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.039) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.035) |
(0.036) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.043) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.101 |
-0.056 |
|
0.138 |
0.138 |
|
-0.037 |
-0.005 |
|
-0.018 |
-0.039 |
|
0.042 |
0.083 |
|
0.022 |
0.051 |
|
0.061 |
0.050 |
|
0.038 |
0.054 |
|
-0.055 |
-0.026 |
|
|
(0.086) |
(0.088) |
|
(0.131) |
(0.142) |
|
(0.119) |
(0.126) |
|
(0.133) |
(0.138) |
|
(0.135) |
(0.135) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.138) |
(0.146) |
|
(0.095) |
(0.106) |
|
(0.142) |
(0.148) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.043 |
0.050 |
|
-0.027 |
-0.036 |
|
0.010 |
0.014 |
|
0.021 |
0.004 |
|
-0.008 |
0.003 |
|
-0.067 |
-0.039 |
|
0.046 |
0.040 |
|
0.069+ |
0.081+ |
|
0.005 |
-0.002 |
|
|
(0.044) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.040) |
(0.042) |
|
(0.047) |
(0.050) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.018 |
0.019 |
|
0.052*** |
0.046** |
|
0.050*** |
0.045*** |
|
-0.015 |
-0.016 |
|
-0.026+ |
-0.027+ |
|
-0.024+ |
-0.021 |
|
0.006 |
0.004 |
|
0.021+ |
0.021+ |
|
0.010 |
0.009 |
|
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.013) |
(0.014) |
|
(0.011) |
(0.012) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.018 |
-0.005 |
|
0.015 |
-0.043 |
|
-0.135+ |
-0.113 |
|
0.000 |
-0.048 |
|
-0.022 |
-0.003 |
|
0.062 |
0.068 |
|
0.038 |
-0.043 |
|
-0.086 |
-0.077 |
|
-0.004 |
-0.026 |
|
|
(0.076) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.070) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.078) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.120 |
-0.110 |
|
-0.024 |
-0.021 |
|
-0.127+ |
-0.127 |
|
-0.084 |
-0.069 |
|
-0.107 |
-0.091 |
|
-0.086 |
-0.064 |
|
-0.100 |
-0.108 |
|
-0.064 |
-0.063 |
|
-0.062 |
-0.043 |
|
|
(0.074) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.096) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.088) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.072) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.081) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.097) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.008 |
0.013 |
|
-0.030 |
-0.039 |
|
-0.034 |
-0.039 |
|
-0.040 |
-0.036 |
|
0.068 |
0.069 |
|
-0.058 |
-0.044 |
|
-0.083 |
-0.113+ |
|
-0.047 |
-0.036 |
|
0.007 |
-0.007 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.046) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.061) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.268* |
-0.301* |
|
-0.078 |
-0.120 |
|
-0.347*** |
-0.376*** |
|
-0.116 |
-0.058 |
|
-0.090 |
-0.127 |
|
-0.382*** |
-0.441*** |
|
-0.238 |
-0.203 |
|
-0.270** |
-0.280* |
|
-0.203 |
-0.199 |
|
|
(0.110) |
(0.118) |
|
(0.259) |
(0.265) |
|
(0.091) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.272) |
(0.264) |
|
(0.227) |
(0.208) |
|
(0.104) |
(0.113) |
|
(0.212) |
(0.205) |
|
(0.097) |
(0.110) |
|
(0.223) |
(0.230) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.003+ |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.002+ |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.036 |
|
|
0.084+ |
|
|
0.043 |
|
|
0.068 |
|
|
-0.028 |
|
|
-0.065 |
|
|
0.077+ |
|
|
-0.009 |
|
|
-0.013 |
|
|
|
(0.038) |
|
|
(0.048) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.046) |
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.035) |
|
|
(0.043) |
| Num.Obs. |
603 |
549 |
506 |
603 |
549 |
506 |
603 |
549 |
506 |
603 |
549 |
506 |
603 |
549 |
506 |
603 |
549 |
506 |
603 |
549 |
506 |
603 |
549 |
506 |
603 |
549 |
506 |
| R2 |
0.007 |
0.201 |
0.222 |
0.002 |
0.045 |
0.053 |
0.003 |
0.244 |
0.249 |
0.010 |
0.090 |
0.097 |
0.001 |
0.057 |
0.070 |
0.002 |
0.050 |
0.071 |
0.006 |
0.220 |
0.226 |
0.004 |
0.137 |
0.168 |
0.003 |
0.121 |
0.129 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch loudest |
DV: Sarpanch equal status. |
DV: Sarpanch confidence speech |
DV: Sarpanch engaged decision-making |
DV: Sarpanch active listening |
DV: Sarpanch consensus building |
DV: Sarpanch body language confidence |
DV: Sarpanch body language fearlessness |
DV: Sarpanch body language interest |
IC6b (H3.6b) table, effect of T1, Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.647*** |
0.706*** |
0.707*** |
0.459*** |
0.375*** |
0.397** |
0.549*** |
0.579*** |
0.673*** |
0.376*** |
0.499*** |
0.455** |
0.534*** |
0.645*** |
0.719*** |
0.759*** |
0.851*** |
0.853*** |
0.534*** |
0.636*** |
0.736*** |
0.752*** |
0.648*** |
0.768*** |
0.624*** |
0.642*** |
0.724*** |
|
(0.042) |
(0.090) |
(0.122) |
(0.043) |
(0.103) |
(0.148) |
(0.043) |
(0.089) |
(0.131) |
(0.042) |
(0.098) |
(0.142) |
(0.043) |
(0.103) |
(0.146) |
(0.037) |
(0.095) |
(0.128) |
(0.043) |
(0.090) |
(0.133) |
(0.038) |
(0.080) |
(0.107) |
(0.042) |
(0.086) |
(0.131) |
| T1 |
0.076 |
0.035 |
0.053 |
-0.040 |
-0.042 |
-0.034 |
0.025 |
-0.030 |
-0.033 |
0.029 |
0.003 |
-0.006 |
-0.000 |
-0.001 |
0.011 |
-0.050 |
-0.060 |
-0.079 |
0.061 |
0.009 |
0.039 |
0.045 |
0.024 |
0.016 |
0.058 |
0.022 |
0.023 |
|
(0.056) |
(0.050) |
(0.052) |
(0.059) |
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
(0.059) |
(0.053) |
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
(0.060) |
(0.064) |
(0.060) |
(0.062) |
(0.066) |
(0.053) |
(0.054) |
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
(0.054) |
(0.058) |
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
(0.057) |
(0.052) |
(0.056) |
| Sarpanch SC |
0.133+ |
0.183+ |
0.184+ |
-0.001 |
0.078 |
0.076 |
-0.040 |
0.050 |
0.037 |
0.133+ |
0.257+ |
0.246+ |
-0.008 |
0.051 |
0.031 |
-0.081 |
-0.038 |
-0.103 |
0.144+ |
0.175+ |
0.151 |
0.062 |
0.069 |
0.022 |
0.054 |
0.041 |
0.010 |
|
(0.069) |
(0.104) |
(0.107) |
(0.078) |
(0.138) |
(0.143) |
(0.079) |
(0.109) |
(0.115) |
(0.078) |
(0.131) |
(0.139) |
(0.079) |
(0.129) |
(0.134) |
(0.072) |
(0.127) |
(0.129) |
(0.075) |
(0.101) |
(0.110) |
(0.063) |
(0.111) |
(0.108) |
(0.074) |
(0.131) |
(0.135) |
| T1:Sarpanch SC |
-0.129 |
-0.146 |
-0.151 |
0.006 |
-0.015 |
-0.033 |
0.027 |
0.010 |
-0.004 |
-0.174 |
-0.223* |
-0.186 |
0.020 |
-0.032 |
-0.064 |
0.114 |
0.116 |
0.144 |
-0.208* |
-0.202* |
-0.207+ |
-0.056 |
-0.053 |
-0.068 |
-0.009 |
-0.021 |
-0.019 |
|
(0.095) |
(0.098) |
(0.101) |
(0.108) |
(0.119) |
(0.122) |
(0.108) |
(0.101) |
(0.104) |
(0.106) |
(0.112) |
(0.119) |
(0.108) |
(0.116) |
(0.119) |
(0.097) |
(0.103) |
(0.106) |
(0.105) |
(0.101) |
(0.106) |
(0.087) |
(0.088) |
(0.090) |
(0.100) |
(0.107) |
(0.112) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.197 |
-0.169 |
|
-0.190 |
-0.179 |
|
-0.362* |
-0.369* |
|
-0.127 |
-0.070 |
|
-0.185 |
-0.148 |
|
-0.288* |
-0.269+ |
|
-0.470** |
-0.414* |
|
-0.155 |
-0.163 |
|
-0.271 |
-0.243 |
|
|
(0.127) |
(0.134) |
|
(0.191) |
(0.198) |
|
(0.165) |
(0.170) |
|
(0.201) |
(0.199) |
|
(0.176) |
(0.182) |
|
(0.145) |
(0.149) |
|
(0.178) |
(0.180) |
|
(0.142) |
(0.144) |
|
(0.176) |
(0.181) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.034 |
0.003 |
|
0.115 |
0.119 |
|
0.134** |
0.114+ |
|
-0.241 |
-0.214 |
|
0.050 |
0.056 |
|
0.222** |
0.229* |
|
-0.229 |
-0.244 |
|
0.067 |
-0.004 |
|
-0.253 |
-0.277 |
|
|
(0.106) |
(0.133) |
|
(0.352) |
(0.327) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.265) |
(0.270) |
|
(0.337) |
(0.267) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.100) |
|
(0.269) |
(0.270) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.298) |
(0.300) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.054 |
-0.008 |
|
-0.071 |
-0.043 |
|
0.059 |
0.052 |
|
-0.019 |
-0.007 |
|
-0.076 |
-0.068 |
|
-0.025 |
-0.042 |
|
0.003 |
0.028 |
|
0.061 |
0.040 |
|
-0.041 |
-0.047 |
|
|
(0.059) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.072) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.064) |
(0.064) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.071) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.070) |
| Education above median |
|
0.203*** |
0.210*** |
|
-0.020 |
-0.023 |
|
0.173*** |
0.168** |
|
0.127* |
0.121* |
|
0.041 |
0.047 |
|
0.081+ |
0.085+ |
|
0.184*** |
0.189*** |
|
0.127** |
0.148*** |
|
0.170*** |
0.182*** |
|
|
(0.045) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.039 |
0.015 |
|
0.019 |
-0.041 |
|
0.011 |
0.005 |
|
0.044 |
0.060 |
|
0.120* |
0.135* |
|
0.095* |
0.109* |
|
0.091+ |
0.058 |
|
0.013 |
0.014 |
|
0.098* |
0.107* |
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.047) |
|
(0.053) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.042) |
(0.044) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.092 |
-0.074 |
|
0.055 |
0.066 |
|
0.055 |
0.059 |
|
-0.039 |
-0.044 |
|
0.090 |
0.072 |
|
0.165 |
0.168 |
|
0.106 |
0.121 |
|
0.082 |
0.094 |
|
-0.017 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.105) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.178) |
(0.183) |
|
(0.153) |
(0.153) |
|
(0.188) |
(0.179) |
|
(0.164) |
(0.165) |
|
(0.124) |
(0.125) |
|
(0.167) |
(0.163) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.129) |
|
(0.165) |
(0.167) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.027 |
0.038 |
|
0.007 |
-0.010 |
|
0.004 |
-0.001 |
|
0.021 |
-0.000 |
|
-0.012 |
-0.003 |
|
-0.040 |
-0.025 |
|
0.021 |
0.024 |
|
0.085+ |
0.081 |
|
-0.027 |
-0.039 |
|
|
(0.054) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.012 |
0.010 |
|
0.069*** |
0.062** |
|
0.047** |
0.042** |
|
-0.031+ |
-0.031+ |
|
-0.036+ |
-0.029 |
|
-0.022 |
-0.016 |
|
0.007 |
0.001 |
|
0.026+ |
0.024+ |
|
0.022 |
0.020 |
|
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.014) |
(0.015) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.018 |
-0.008 |
|
0.064 |
0.043 |
|
-0.112 |
-0.098 |
|
0.003 |
-0.061 |
|
-0.030 |
-0.043 |
|
0.078 |
0.059 |
|
0.029 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.051 |
-0.064 |
|
0.002 |
-0.027 |
|
|
(0.088) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.088) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.079) |
(0.089) |
|
(0.086) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.089) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.082) |
(0.093) |
|
(0.083) |
(0.089) |
|
(0.083) |
(0.087) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.041 |
-0.049 |
|
-0.093 |
-0.095 |
|
-0.023 |
-0.020 |
|
-0.110 |
-0.078 |
|
-0.053 |
-0.030 |
|
-0.058 |
-0.037 |
|
-0.036 |
-0.014 |
|
0.030 |
0.050 |
|
0.053 |
0.073 |
|
|
(0.088) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.111) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.098) |
|
(0.112) |
(0.120) |
|
(0.111) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.111) |
(0.112) |
|
(0.085) |
(0.091) |
|
(0.097) |
(0.094) |
|
(0.108) |
(0.112) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.001 |
-0.009 |
|
-0.038 |
-0.043 |
|
-0.035 |
-0.053 |
|
0.015 |
0.041 |
|
0.048 |
0.043 |
|
-0.087 |
-0.075 |
|
-0.031 |
-0.045 |
|
-0.039 |
-0.036 |
|
0.060 |
0.035 |
|
|
(0.058) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.074) |
|
(0.065) |
(0.070) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.066) |
|
(0.064) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.056) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.069) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.154 |
-0.199 |
|
-0.225 |
-0.308 |
|
-0.328*** |
-0.391*** |
|
0.213 |
0.219 |
|
0.125 |
0.072 |
|
-0.317* |
-0.392* |
|
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
-0.313** |
-0.281* |
|
0.061 |
0.077 |
|
|
(0.147) |
(0.168) |
|
(0.367) |
(0.342) |
|
(0.095) |
(0.097) |
|
(0.282) |
(0.290) |
|
(0.354) |
(0.290) |
|
(0.132) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.284) |
(0.287) |
|
(0.117) |
(0.127) |
|
(0.317) |
(0.320) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.002+ |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.003 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.006* |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.059 |
|
|
0.111+ |
|
|
0.038 |
|
|
0.071 |
|
|
-0.038 |
|
|
-0.025 |
|
|
0.065 |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.058) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.052) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.051) |
| Num.Obs. |
406 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
| R2 |
0.010 |
0.222 |
0.240 |
0.001 |
0.071 |
0.083 |
0.002 |
0.269 |
0.280 |
0.009 |
0.096 |
0.097 |
0.000 |
0.058 |
0.073 |
0.004 |
0.071 |
0.089 |
0.010 |
0.263 |
0.251 |
0.003 |
0.151 |
0.184 |
0.006 |
0.191 |
0.192 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch loudest |
DV: Sarpanch equal status. |
DV: Sarpanch confidence speech |
DV: Sarpanch engaged decision-making |
DV: Sarpanch active listening |
DV: Sarpanch consensus building |
DV: Sarpanch body language confidence |
DV: Sarpanch body language fearlessness |
DV: Sarpanch body language interest |
IC6b (H3.6b) table, effect of T2, Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.647*** |
0.625*** |
0.558*** |
0.459*** |
0.445*** |
0.447** |
0.549*** |
0.601*** |
0.643*** |
0.376*** |
0.531*** |
0.696*** |
0.534*** |
0.621*** |
0.699*** |
0.759*** |
0.874*** |
0.911*** |
0.534*** |
0.619*** |
0.771*** |
0.752*** |
0.697*** |
0.683*** |
0.624*** |
0.783*** |
0.903*** |
|
(0.042) |
(0.093) |
(0.132) |
(0.043) |
(0.111) |
(0.158) |
(0.043) |
(0.096) |
(0.144) |
(0.042) |
(0.099) |
(0.148) |
(0.043) |
(0.107) |
(0.156) |
(0.037) |
(0.098) |
(0.132) |
(0.043) |
(0.098) |
(0.146) |
(0.038) |
(0.088) |
(0.116) |
(0.042) |
(0.098) |
(0.142) |
| T2 |
0.076 |
0.030 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.007 |
-0.003 |
0.062 |
0.038 |
0.013 |
-0.051 |
-0.085 |
-0.095 |
0.046 |
0.043 |
0.051 |
-0.013 |
-0.029 |
-0.040 |
0.053 |
0.007 |
0.013 |
0.058 |
0.045 |
0.039 |
-0.013 |
-0.042 |
-0.056 |
|
(0.058) |
(0.053) |
(0.056) |
(0.062) |
(0.065) |
(0.068) |
(0.061) |
(0.057) |
(0.060) |
(0.059) |
(0.060) |
(0.064) |
(0.062) |
(0.064) |
(0.066) |
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
(0.058) |
(0.062) |
(0.058) |
(0.061) |
(0.051) |
(0.052) |
(0.053) |
(0.061) |
(0.060) |
(0.063) |
| Sarpanch SC |
0.133+ |
0.243* |
0.246* |
-0.001 |
-0.087 |
-0.063 |
-0.040 |
0.222+ |
0.241* |
0.133+ |
0.071 |
0.070 |
-0.008 |
0.201 |
0.164 |
-0.081 |
0.031 |
-0.050 |
0.144+ |
0.232* |
0.263* |
0.062 |
0.150 |
0.152 |
0.054 |
0.149 |
0.138 |
|
(0.069) |
(0.114) |
(0.116) |
(0.078) |
(0.143) |
(0.145) |
(0.079) |
(0.116) |
(0.122) |
(0.078) |
(0.120) |
(0.129) |
(0.079) |
(0.128) |
(0.130) |
(0.072) |
(0.130) |
(0.128) |
(0.075) |
(0.105) |
(0.108) |
(0.063) |
(0.111) |
(0.111) |
(0.074) |
(0.146) |
(0.151) |
| T2:Sarpanch SC |
-0.151 |
-0.181+ |
-0.126 |
-0.095 |
-0.103 |
-0.082 |
0.035 |
-0.024 |
-0.027 |
-0.162 |
-0.240* |
-0.214+ |
0.007 |
-0.018 |
-0.024 |
0.054 |
0.045 |
0.082 |
-0.098 |
-0.074 |
-0.062 |
-0.153+ |
-0.158+ |
-0.176+ |
0.011 |
0.004 |
0.027 |
|
(0.096) |
(0.100) |
(0.101) |
(0.107) |
(0.119) |
(0.124) |
(0.107) |
(0.104) |
(0.107) |
(0.104) |
(0.107) |
(0.111) |
(0.108) |
(0.116) |
(0.119) |
(0.098) |
(0.103) |
(0.103) |
(0.104) |
(0.105) |
(0.108) |
(0.090) |
(0.091) |
(0.093) |
(0.103) |
(0.110) |
(0.115) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.071 |
-0.075 |
|
-0.178 |
-0.026 |
|
-0.247 |
-0.306 |
|
-0.231 |
-0.227 |
|
-0.053 |
-0.132 |
|
-0.054 |
-0.089 |
|
-0.521* |
-0.437+ |
|
-0.204 |
-0.259 |
|
-0.191 |
-0.224 |
|
|
(0.127) |
(0.143) |
|
(0.188) |
(0.211) |
|
(0.184) |
(0.201) |
|
(0.171) |
(0.188) |
|
(0.209) |
(0.218) |
|
(0.159) |
(0.170) |
|
(0.202) |
(0.228) |
|
(0.154) |
(0.177) |
|
(0.227) |
(0.255) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.147 |
0.146 |
|
0.034 |
0.028 |
|
0.212*** |
0.181** |
|
0.273 |
0.212 |
|
0.213 |
0.214 |
|
0.313*** |
0.323*** |
|
-0.041 |
-0.092 |
|
0.130* |
0.112 |
|
-0.053 |
-0.055 |
|
|
(0.092) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.280) |
(0.296) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.275) |
(0.272) |
|
(0.275) |
(0.237) |
|
(0.053) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.235) |
(0.224) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.085) |
|
(0.248) |
(0.259) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.023 |
-0.008 |
|
-0.079 |
-0.039 |
|
0.012 |
0.005 |
|
-0.058 |
-0.033 |
|
-0.115 |
-0.120 |
|
-0.051 |
-0.069 |
|
0.055 |
0.056 |
|
0.076 |
0.056 |
|
0.014 |
0.000 |
|
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.078) |
(0.083) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.064) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.079) |
| Education above median |
|
0.195*** |
0.233*** |
|
0.010 |
0.006 |
|
0.138** |
0.122* |
|
0.072 |
0.068 |
|
0.053 |
0.047 |
|
0.075 |
0.061 |
|
0.137** |
0.154** |
|
0.121** |
0.144** |
|
0.074 |
0.111* |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.060) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.056) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.054) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.053) |
(0.056) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.013 |
-0.022 |
|
-0.044 |
-0.055 |
|
-0.017 |
-0.018 |
|
0.066 |
0.063 |
|
0.133* |
0.148** |
|
0.065 |
0.089+ |
|
0.055 |
0.047 |
|
0.062 |
0.074 |
|
-0.011 |
-0.005 |
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.048) |
|
(0.056) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.052) |
(0.055) |
|
(0.054) |
(0.057) |
|
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.160 |
-0.114 |
|
0.203 |
0.175 |
|
-0.021 |
0.029 |
|
-0.090 |
-0.114 |
|
-0.094 |
-0.066 |
|
-0.122 |
-0.124 |
|
0.137 |
0.122 |
|
0.004 |
0.049 |
|
-0.129 |
-0.080 |
|
|
(0.097) |
(0.102) |
|
(0.167) |
(0.184) |
|
(0.165) |
(0.170) |
|
(0.158) |
(0.166) |
|
(0.183) |
(0.191) |
|
(0.125) |
(0.135) |
|
(0.190) |
(0.207) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.142) |
|
(0.210) |
(0.230) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.058 |
0.041 |
|
-0.052 |
-0.070 |
|
0.020 |
0.016 |
|
0.001 |
-0.013 |
|
-0.020 |
-0.016 |
|
-0.083 |
-0.045 |
|
0.046 |
0.010 |
|
0.009 |
0.033 |
|
-0.001 |
-0.018 |
|
|
(0.056) |
(0.056) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.063) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.066) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.027+ |
0.026 |
|
0.046* |
0.044* |
|
0.047** |
0.035* |
|
-0.006 |
-0.011 |
|
-0.028 |
-0.033+ |
|
-0.022 |
-0.015 |
|
0.012 |
0.006 |
|
0.023 |
0.021 |
|
0.002 |
-0.004 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.019) |
(0.020) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
|
(0.017) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.018) |
(0.019) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.011 |
-0.032 |
|
-0.059 |
-0.169 |
|
-0.119 |
-0.109 |
|
0.103 |
0.090 |
|
0.021 |
0.035 |
|
0.121 |
0.122 |
|
0.126 |
0.032 |
|
0.050 |
0.054 |
|
0.071 |
0.047 |
|
|
(0.097) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.101) |
(0.106) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.103) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.103) |
(0.104) |
|
(0.092) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.103) |
(0.111) |
|
(0.102) |
(0.108) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.086 |
-0.083 |
|
0.093 |
0.082 |
|
-0.253* |
-0.259* |
|
0.069 |
0.055 |
|
-0.226* |
-0.184 |
|
-0.123 |
-0.074 |
|
-0.107 |
-0.171+ |
|
-0.054 |
-0.060 |
|
-0.108 |
-0.107 |
|
|
(0.103) |
(0.105) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.130) |
|
(0.101) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.105) |
(0.112) |
|
(0.115) |
(0.117) |
|
(0.118) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.095) |
(0.096) |
|
(0.099) |
(0.100) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.137) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.024 |
0.050 |
|
0.014 |
0.016 |
|
-0.025 |
-0.013 |
|
-0.036 |
-0.056 |
|
0.103 |
0.122 |
|
0.003 |
0.035 |
|
-0.124+ |
-0.160* |
|
-0.071 |
-0.039 |
|
-0.029 |
-0.037 |
|
|
(0.063) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.071) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.064) |
(0.065) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.062) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.080) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.357* |
-0.384* |
|
-0.246 |
-0.297 |
|
-0.328** |
-0.281* |
|
-0.359 |
-0.271 |
|
-0.050 |
-0.056 |
|
-0.388** |
-0.411** |
|
-0.183 |
-0.125 |
|
-0.344* |
-0.290+ |
|
-0.170 |
-0.134 |
|
|
(0.140) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.299) |
(0.314) |
|
(0.111) |
(0.121) |
|
(0.290) |
(0.290) |
|
(0.295) |
(0.258) |
|
(0.124) |
(0.136) |
|
(0.258) |
(0.250) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.149) |
|
(0.274) |
(0.287) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002+ |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.004+ |
|
|
-0.004 |
|
|
-0.003 |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.003) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.047 |
|
|
0.051 |
|
|
0.097+ |
|
|
0.064 |
|
|
-0.069 |
|
|
-0.133* |
|
|
0.109* |
|
|
0.021 |
|
|
0.023 |
|
|
|
(0.049) |
|
|
(0.062) |
|
|
(0.054) |
|
|
(0.058) |
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.053) |
|
|
(0.054) |
|
|
(0.044) |
|
|
(0.056) |
| Num.Obs. |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.010 |
0.214 |
0.240 |
0.005 |
0.046 |
0.058 |
0.006 |
0.250 |
0.254 |
0.020 |
0.136 |
0.160 |
0.002 |
0.069 |
0.098 |
0.004 |
0.049 |
0.086 |
0.011 |
0.208 |
0.234 |
0.008 |
0.139 |
0.175 |
0.003 |
0.117 |
0.127 |
IC7a (H3.7a): Public indicators of respect for the sarpanch will
be higher for those assigned to any treatment (T1 or T2, considered
jointly) versus not (Control).
- IC7a is assessed by regressing indicators of the upa sarpanch and
gram sevak behavior during the group meeting on a binary indicator of
treatment (bundling T1 and T2 versus control), and on the set of
demographic controls defined in our online appendix. We also control for
the potential presence of a sarpanch relative during the interview (“the
interview” being here understood as the group interview), both
separately and in interaction with the gender of the sarpanch.
Cluster-corrected standard errors will be used at the administrative
block level in all models.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2. We also
include the series of individual and village level controls presented in
G2.
- We use the following outcome measure:
- Q76: IF YES to sarpanch speaks above: Was the sarpanch interrupted
at any point while she/he spoke? Code centrality as 1 if answer is 0
(No), and 0 if answer is 1 (Yes).
- Deviation 1: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of t2 |
IC7a (H3.7a) table
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.751*** |
0.667*** |
0.713*** |
0.751*** |
0.688*** |
0.806*** |
0.751*** |
0.695*** |
0.686*** |
|
(0.033) |
(0.076) |
(0.109) |
(0.033) |
(0.088) |
(0.126) |
(0.033) |
(0.099) |
(0.149) |
| Discussion rules |
0.063 |
0.040 |
0.042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.039) |
(0.040) |
(0.042) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.286* |
-0.310* |
|
-0.190 |
-0.143 |
|
-0.377* |
-0.434* |
|
|
(0.122) |
(0.129) |
|
(0.145) |
(0.129) |
|
(0.174) |
(0.190) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.069 |
-0.071 |
|
0.120** |
0.140 |
|
-0.135 |
-0.146 |
|
|
(0.211) |
(0.222) |
|
(0.041) |
(0.095) |
|
(0.257) |
(0.262) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.129 |
0.120 |
|
0.046 |
0.018 |
|
0.180 |
0.192 |
|
|
(0.090) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.135) |
(0.137) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.013 |
0.000 |
|
0.012 |
0.005 |
|
0.040 |
0.029 |
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.068) |
(0.072) |
| Education above median |
|
0.008 |
0.001 |
|
0.028 |
0.032 |
|
-0.011 |
-0.018 |
|
|
(0.036) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.043 |
-0.036 |
|
-0.039 |
-0.040 |
|
-0.064 |
-0.058 |
|
|
(0.036) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
0.155 |
0.175 |
|
0.069 |
0.054 |
|
0.234 |
0.291+ |
|
|
(0.112) |
(0.112) |
|
(0.135) |
(0.115) |
|
(0.154) |
(0.159) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.071+ |
0.069+ |
|
0.068 |
0.070 |
|
0.058 |
0.060 |
|
|
(0.037) |
(0.041) |
|
(0.045) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.047*** |
0.039** |
|
0.052*** |
0.046** |
|
0.045** |
0.033+ |
|
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.062 |
0.064 |
|
0.005 |
-0.029 |
|
0.057 |
0.071 |
|
|
(0.069) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.078) |
(0.085) |
|
(0.096) |
(0.103) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.160+ |
-0.153+ |
|
-0.096 |
-0.081 |
|
-0.210 |
-0.225 |
|
|
(0.090) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.137) |
(0.141) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.005 |
0.024 |
|
-0.072 |
-0.060 |
|
0.023 |
0.057 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.070) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.084 |
-0.085 |
|
-0.234* |
-0.256+ |
|
-0.051 |
-0.077 |
|
|
(0.234) |
(0.246) |
|
(0.119) |
(0.147) |
|
(0.296) |
(0.305) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.003+ |
|
|
-0.005** |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.042 |
|
|
0.029 |
|
|
0.085+ |
|
|
|
(0.037) |
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.049) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.086* |
0.060 |
0.071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.042) |
(0.043) |
(0.046) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.039 |
0.014 |
0.008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.045) |
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Num.Obs. |
552 |
504 |
466 |
366 |
336 |
310 |
355 |
322 |
299 |
| R2 |
0.005 |
0.087 |
0.096 |
0.011 |
0.114 |
0.134 |
0.002 |
0.094 |
0.108 |
IC7b (H3.7b): We additionally expect this effect to be driven by
sarpanches from disadvantaged groups.
- IC7b is assessed by running the same model (as above), plus an
interaction between treatment (bundling T1 and T2 versus control) and a
binary indicator of the disadvantaged status of sarpanch (with
sarpanches from disadvantaged groups primarily either understood as
women, Scheduled castes or both in separate models). We also control for
the potential presence of a sarpanch relative during the interview (“the
interview” being here understood as the group interview), both
separately and in interaction with the gender of the sarpanch.
Cluster-corrected standard errors will be used at the administrative
block level in all models.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2. We also
include the series of individual and village level controls presented in
G2.
- The same measures are used as in IC7a.
- Deviation 1: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Precision 1: For each outcome, we run one
regression interacting a female indicator with treatment status, as well
as a regression interacting an indicator for SC with treatment status.
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of t2 |
IC7b (H3.7b) table, Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.894*** |
0.723*** |
0.776*** |
0.894*** |
0.724*** |
0.861*** |
0.894*** |
0.739*** |
0.736*** |
|
(0.038) |
(0.084) |
(0.118) |
(0.038) |
(0.097) |
(0.138) |
(0.038) |
(0.103) |
(0.154) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.041 |
-0.031 |
-0.030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.046) |
(0.052) |
(0.057) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.234*** |
-0.374** |
-0.395** |
-0.234*** |
-0.242 |
-0.209 |
-0.234*** |
-0.450* |
-0.495* |
|
(0.060) |
(0.136) |
(0.143) |
(0.060) |
(0.156) |
(0.141) |
(0.060) |
(0.183) |
(0.198) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
0.161* |
0.123 |
0.123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.072) |
(0.077) |
(0.082) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.078 |
-0.083 |
|
0.107** |
0.121 |
|
-0.138 |
-0.152 |
|
|
(0.205) |
(0.216) |
|
(0.038) |
(0.092) |
|
(0.245) |
(0.251) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.130 |
0.120 |
|
0.047 |
0.017 |
|
0.181 |
0.193 |
|
|
(0.089) |
(0.090) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.076) |
|
(0.134) |
(0.136) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.010 |
-0.003 |
|
0.010 |
0.002 |
|
0.036 |
0.024 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.068) |
(0.072) |
| Education above median |
|
0.008 |
0.002 |
|
0.028 |
0.032 |
|
-0.008 |
-0.015 |
|
|
(0.036) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.040 |
-0.034 |
|
-0.036 |
-0.038 |
|
-0.061 |
-0.056 |
|
|
(0.036) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
0.153 |
0.173 |
|
0.067 |
0.051 |
|
0.233 |
0.286+ |
|
|
(0.112) |
(0.112) |
|
(0.133) |
(0.112) |
|
(0.156) |
(0.163) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.069+ |
0.068+ |
|
0.065 |
0.068 |
|
0.059 |
0.061 |
|
|
(0.037) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.047*** |
0.039** |
|
0.051** |
0.045** |
|
0.045** |
0.033+ |
|
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.066 |
0.065 |
|
0.011 |
-0.023 |
|
0.057 |
0.065 |
|
|
(0.069) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.079) |
(0.086) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.106) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.165+ |
-0.157+ |
|
-0.102 |
-0.086 |
|
-0.215 |
-0.229 |
|
|
(0.089) |
(0.089) |
|
(0.073) |
(0.075) |
|
(0.136) |
(0.139) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.007 |
0.022 |
|
-0.075 |
-0.063 |
|
0.020 |
0.056 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.066) |
(0.069) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.072 |
-0.072 |
|
-0.223+ |
-0.240+ |
|
-0.035 |
-0.063 |
|
|
(0.229) |
(0.241) |
|
(0.118) |
(0.145) |
|
(0.287) |
(0.296) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.003+ |
|
|
-0.006** |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.042 |
|
|
0.027 |
|
|
0.087+ |
|
|
|
(0.037) |
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.048) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-0.006 |
0.009 |
0.005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.051) |
(0.055) |
(0.061) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
0.142+ |
0.090 |
0.116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.079) |
(0.084) |
(0.090) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.075 |
-0.064 |
-0.066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.062) |
(0.068) |
| T2:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.175* |
0.140 |
0.131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.085) |
(0.092) |
(0.098) |
| Num.Obs. |
552 |
504 |
466 |
366 |
336 |
310 |
355 |
322 |
299 |
| R2 |
0.035 |
0.092 |
0.100 |
0.056 |
0.117 |
0.138 |
0.040 |
0.101 |
0.113 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of t2 |
IC7b (H3.7b) table, Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.780*** |
0.680*** |
0.733*** |
0.780*** |
0.701*** |
0.826*** |
0.780*** |
0.705*** |
0.705*** |
|
(0.038) |
(0.078) |
(0.111) |
(0.038) |
(0.089) |
(0.127) |
(0.038) |
(0.102) |
(0.151) |
| Discussion rules |
0.037 |
0.020 |
0.015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.045) |
(0.045) |
(0.049) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch SC |
-0.093 |
0.081 |
0.056 |
-0.093 |
-0.004 |
-0.045 |
-0.093 |
0.148 |
0.144 |
|
(0.076) |
(0.110) |
(0.112) |
(0.076) |
(0.101) |
(0.107) |
(0.076) |
(0.139) |
(0.142) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch SC |
0.085 |
0.070 |
0.093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.087) |
(0.093) |
(0.097) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
-0.286* |
-0.309* |
|
-0.194 |
-0.146 |
|
-0.372* |
-0.429* |
|
|
(0.120) |
(0.127) |
|
(0.141) |
(0.123) |
|
(0.173) |
(0.186) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.065 |
-0.067 |
|
0.130** |
0.150 |
|
-0.133 |
-0.145 |
|
|
(0.217) |
(0.231) |
|
(0.050) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.266) |
(0.276) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.014 |
0.001 |
|
0.013 |
0.006 |
|
0.041 |
0.029 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.053) |
|
(0.055) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.068) |
(0.072) |
| Education above median |
|
0.008 |
0.002 |
|
0.029 |
0.032 |
|
-0.011 |
-0.018 |
|
|
(0.036) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.043) |
(0.045) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.043 |
-0.035 |
|
-0.039 |
-0.039 |
|
-0.063 |
-0.056 |
|
|
(0.036) |
(0.038) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.046) |
|
(0.048) |
(0.051) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
0.155 |
0.176 |
|
0.069 |
0.055 |
|
0.233 |
0.291+ |
|
|
(0.110) |
(0.109) |
|
(0.129) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.152) |
(0.155) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.071+ |
0.070+ |
|
0.069 |
0.072 |
|
0.059 |
0.060 |
|
|
(0.037) |
(0.040) |
|
(0.044) |
(0.049) |
|
(0.051) |
(0.054) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.047*** |
0.039** |
|
0.051*** |
0.046** |
|
0.044** |
0.032+ |
|
|
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
|
(0.015) |
(0.016) |
|
(0.016) |
(0.017) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.062 |
0.062 |
|
0.010 |
-0.026 |
|
0.053 |
0.064 |
|
|
(0.069) |
(0.077) |
|
(0.079) |
(0.085) |
|
(0.096) |
(0.103) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.160+ |
-0.153+ |
|
-0.092 |
-0.074 |
|
-0.214 |
-0.232 |
|
|
(0.090) |
(0.091) |
|
(0.076) |
(0.080) |
|
(0.139) |
(0.142) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.004 |
0.026 |
|
-0.071 |
-0.057 |
|
0.025 |
0.060 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.052) |
|
(0.057) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.067) |
(0.070) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.089 |
-0.093 |
|
-0.247* |
-0.272+ |
|
-0.053 |
-0.084 |
|
|
(0.240) |
(0.255) |
|
(0.123) |
(0.156) |
|
(0.304) |
(0.317) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.003+ |
|
|
-0.005** |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.044 |
|
|
0.030 |
|
|
0.089+ |
|
|
|
(0.038) |
|
|
(0.047) |
|
|
(0.049) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.060 |
0.036 |
0.040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.050) |
(0.049) |
(0.053) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
0.084 |
0.089 |
0.111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.096) |
(0.102) |
(0.106) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.010 |
-0.006 |
-0.024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.054) |
(0.055) |
(0.059) |
| T2:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.091 |
0.066 |
0.102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.099) |
(0.108) |
(0.113) |
| Num.Obs. |
550 |
504 |
466 |
365 |
336 |
310 |
354 |
322 |
299 |
| R2 |
0.009 |
0.089 |
0.098 |
0.016 |
0.116 |
0.137 |
0.007 |
0.095 |
0.111 |
Second group of hypotheses: Private Preferences
This measures the extent to which the private preferences of other
actors have changed.
P1 (H3.8): The distance between post-treatment, private
preferences of sarpanch and post-treatment, private preferences of other
group members should be lower for groups assigned to any
treatment.
- Assessed by regressing each of these four metrics (in this case,
comparing the sarpanch’s post-treatment preferences to the
post-treatment preferences of other actors) on treatment status (T1 or
T2 versus Control). We also control for the potential presence of a
sarpanch relative during the interview (“the interview” being here
understood as the group interview), both separately and in interaction
with the gender of the sarpanch. We do this exercise twice. P1a tests
the difference between the sarpanch’s post-treatment allocation and the
upa-sarpanch’s post-treatment allocation. P2b tests the difference
between the sarpanch’s post-treatment allocation and the gram sevak’s
post-treatment allocation.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2.
- We run bivariate regressions, clustering at the taluka level.
- We also include the series of individual and village level
demographic controls presented in G2.
- We use of the following four metrics:
- Metric 1: Earth’s Mover distance’s measure of budgetary congruence,
as defined in Lupu et al 2017.
- Metric 2: Average distance in allocation across the 5 priorities.
Practically, we calculate the difference in %age allocated to each item
across the two distributions; we subsequently average this difference
(that is, we compute the total difference across the five items and
divide this total difference by 5).
- Metric 3: Binary measure coding whether the two distributions
identify the same priority as the “top” priority (that is, the priority
allocated the largest %age.)
- Metric 4: Continuous measure identifying the distance between the
%age of funds allocated to the “top” priority across the two
allocations.
- Deviation 1: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Deviation 2: We originally planed to use the
Earth Mover’s Distance (Lupu et al 2017) as our primary outcome. After
discussion with the developers of the measure, we decided not to use
this measure for two reasons: 1) it does not provide additional
information relative to simpler measures, like metrics 2-4, and 2) the
package to implement the measure is also not operational.
- Deviation 3: We are unable to implement metric 3
and 4 as planned because we did not ask respondents what their top
priority was post-budget discussion. We thus cannot identify top
priorities among the respondents who did not have one budget category
with the highest amount of allocation.
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
P1a (H3.8a) table, Sarpanch and upa sarpanch post-private preferences, average difference
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
9.594*** |
8.519*** |
11.592*** |
9.594*** |
7.275*** |
10.149*** |
9.594*** |
8.372*** |
10.936*** |
|
(0.610) |
(1.510) |
(2.255) |
(0.610) |
(1.800) |
(2.638) |
(0.610) |
(1.784) |
(2.810) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.131 |
0.000 |
-0.050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.748) |
(0.801) |
(0.818) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
2.452 |
1.729 |
|
0.207 |
-0.370 |
|
4.178 |
3.371 |
|
|
(1.979) |
(2.196) |
|
(1.984) |
(2.072) |
|
(2.834) |
(3.163) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-2.858 |
-3.678 |
|
-6.440* |
-6.974* |
|
-3.824 |
-4.740 |
|
|
(2.991) |
(3.106) |
|
(2.855) |
(3.258) |
|
(3.567) |
(3.889) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.435 |
0.239 |
|
0.896 |
0.498 |
|
0.373 |
0.449 |
|
|
(1.585) |
(1.654) |
|
(1.672) |
(1.786) |
|
(2.338) |
(2.366) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-1.155 |
-0.896 |
|
-1.617 |
-1.476 |
|
0.158 |
0.750 |
|
|
(1.002) |
(1.043) |
|
(1.149) |
(1.137) |
|
(1.311) |
(1.378) |
| Education above median |
|
0.861 |
0.620 |
|
2.146* |
2.071* |
|
0.172 |
-0.130 |
|
|
(0.798) |
(0.823) |
|
(0.968) |
(0.980) |
|
(1.007) |
(1.047) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.332 |
-0.363 |
|
0.546 |
-0.514 |
|
0.606 |
0.028 |
|
|
(0.773) |
(0.819) |
|
(0.918) |
(0.987) |
|
(0.942) |
(0.994) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-3.223+ |
-3.286+ |
|
-1.485 |
-1.575 |
|
-3.212 |
-3.490 |
|
|
(1.695) |
(1.813) |
|
(1.625) |
(1.678) |
|
(2.401) |
(2.586) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.578 |
-0.415 |
|
-0.679 |
-0.521 |
|
0.277 |
0.567 |
|
|
(0.864) |
(0.930) |
|
(1.062) |
(1.135) |
|
(1.051) |
(1.103) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.148 |
-0.019 |
|
0.166 |
0.033 |
|
0.094 |
-0.065 |
|
|
(0.264) |
(0.267) |
|
(0.319) |
(0.312) |
|
(0.323) |
(0.342) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.391 |
0.958 |
|
1.548 |
1.835 |
|
-1.612 |
-0.567 |
|
|
(1.288) |
(1.388) |
|
(1.425) |
(1.522) |
|
(1.790) |
(1.886) |
| SC quota |
|
1.259 |
1.590 |
|
1.633 |
2.260 |
|
1.457 |
1.441 |
|
|
(1.572) |
(1.623) |
|
(1.654) |
(1.797) |
|
(2.372) |
(2.355) |
| OBC quota |
|
2.281* |
2.237* |
|
2.872** |
2.863** |
|
1.023 |
0.725 |
|
|
(0.976) |
(1.021) |
|
(1.081) |
(1.089) |
|
(1.328) |
(1.395) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.380 |
2.057 |
|
6.718+ |
7.155+ |
|
0.204 |
1.051 |
|
|
(3.402) |
(3.569) |
|
(3.431) |
(3.822) |
|
(3.899) |
(4.220) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.038+ |
|
|
-0.027 |
|
|
-0.042 |
|
|
|
(0.021) |
|
|
(0.026) |
|
|
(0.026) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.006 |
|
|
-0.023 |
|
|
0.026 |
|
|
|
(0.030) |
|
|
(0.034) |
|
|
(0.042) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.580 |
|
|
0.353 |
|
|
0.305 |
|
|
|
(0.851) |
|
|
(1.019) |
|
|
(1.094) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.004 |
0.039 |
0.086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.849) |
(0.911) |
(0.939) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.279 |
-0.097 |
-0.218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.884) |
(0.967) |
(1.002) |
| Num.Obs. |
604 |
548 |
505 |
406 |
369 |
339 |
389 |
350 |
324 |
| R2 |
0.000 |
0.024 |
0.036 |
0.000 |
0.048 |
0.058 |
0.000 |
0.028 |
0.043 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
P1b (H3.8b) table, Sarpanch and gram sevak post-private preferences, average difference
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
10.080*** |
10.628*** |
13.035*** |
10.080*** |
10.061*** |
12.896*** |
10.080*** |
11.181*** |
12.658*** |
|
(0.578) |
(1.454) |
(2.194) |
(0.578) |
(1.723) |
(2.564) |
(0.578) |
(1.843) |
(2.866) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.053 |
-0.103 |
-0.254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.704) |
(0.719) |
(0.760) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
0.141 |
-0.811 |
|
0.350 |
-0.191 |
|
-0.848 |
-2.407 |
|
|
(2.096) |
(2.245) |
|
(1.654) |
(1.822) |
|
(3.135) |
(3.425) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-2.005 |
-2.368 |
|
-4.612 |
-6.021+ |
|
-3.510 |
-3.600 |
|
|
(3.260) |
(3.318) |
|
(3.753) |
(3.512) |
|
(3.743) |
(3.627) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
1.058 |
0.682 |
|
0.845 |
0.218 |
|
0.695 |
0.594 |
|
|
(1.307) |
(1.454) |
|
(1.483) |
(1.671) |
|
(1.985) |
(2.118) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.727 |
0.505 |
|
0.710 |
0.393 |
|
1.159 |
1.048 |
|
|
(0.897) |
(0.979) |
|
(1.054) |
(1.150) |
|
(1.214) |
(1.314) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.571 |
-0.431 |
|
-0.107 |
0.016 |
|
-0.883 |
-0.784 |
|
|
(0.716) |
(0.746) |
|
(0.857) |
(0.887) |
|
(0.931) |
(0.969) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.338 |
0.553 |
|
0.907 |
1.282 |
|
0.502 |
0.609 |
|
|
(0.722) |
(0.766) |
|
(0.851) |
(0.892) |
|
(0.923) |
(0.985) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-5.342** |
-4.864* |
|
-5.770*** |
-5.822*** |
|
-4.501 |
-3.810 |
|
|
(1.890) |
(2.014) |
|
(1.292) |
(1.392) |
|
(2.846) |
(3.149) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-1.708* |
-1.799* |
|
-2.648** |
-2.559* |
|
-1.174 |
-1.454 |
|
|
(0.756) |
(0.816) |
|
(0.935) |
(0.998) |
|
(0.952) |
(1.020) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.579* |
0.697** |
|
0.776* |
1.042*** |
|
0.375 |
0.314 |
|
|
(0.246) |
(0.259) |
|
(0.304) |
(0.309) |
|
(0.305) |
(0.319) |
| Gender quota |
|
2.223* |
2.776* |
|
2.521* |
3.264** |
|
2.702* |
3.334* |
|
|
(1.002) |
(1.083) |
|
(1.158) |
(1.257) |
|
(1.343) |
(1.352) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.297 |
0.048 |
|
-0.502 |
-0.160 |
|
-0.465 |
-0.018 |
|
|
(1.273) |
(1.378) |
|
(1.389) |
(1.526) |
|
(1.992) |
(2.082) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.682 |
0.681 |
|
0.650 |
0.690 |
|
-0.687 |
-0.707 |
|
|
(0.921) |
(0.992) |
|
(1.070) |
(1.132) |
|
(1.225) |
(1.321) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.952 |
1.924 |
|
6.079 |
6.860+ |
|
4.163 |
4.596 |
|
|
(3.620) |
(3.738) |
|
(4.206) |
(4.101) |
|
(4.351) |
(4.318) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.029 |
|
|
-0.040+ |
|
|
-0.003 |
|
|
|
(0.018) |
|
|
(0.024) |
|
|
(0.022) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.029 |
|
|
-0.022 |
|
|
-0.047 |
|
|
|
(0.030) |
|
|
(0.033) |
|
|
(0.041) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.622 |
|
|
-1.449+ |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
|
(0.746) |
|
|
(0.875) |
|
|
(0.935) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.104 |
-0.060 |
-0.273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.793) |
(0.802) |
(0.843) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.224 |
-0.069 |
-0.270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.833) |
(0.874) |
(0.925) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.000 |
0.057 |
0.069 |
0.000 |
0.083 |
0.111 |
0.000 |
0.044 |
0.052 |
P2 (H3.9): Assignment to any treatment (T1 or T2, considered
jointly) should differentially reduce inequality between sarpanches from
disadvantaged groups in the distance between post-treatment, private
preferences of sarpanch versus those of other group members.
- P2 is assessed by regressing each of these three metrics (in this
case, comparing the sarpanch’s post-treatment preferences to the
post-treatment preferences of other actors) on treatment status (T1 or
T2 versus Control), as well as on sarpanches’ indicators of disadvantage
(gender and caste), and on the interaction between these variables. We
focus here on this interaction. We also control for the potential
presence of a sarpanch relative during the interview (“the interview”
being here understood as the group interview), both separately and in
interaction with the gender of the sarpanch. As above, we repeat this
exercise twice. P2a tests the difference between the sarpanch’s
post-treatment allocation and the upa-sarpanch’s post-treatment
allocation. P2b tests the difference between the sarpanch’s
post-treatment allocation and the gram sevak’s post-treatment
allocation.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2.
- We run bivariate regressions, clustering at the taluka level.
- We also include the series of individual and village level
demographic controls presented in G2.
- Deviation 1: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Deviation 2: We originally planed to use the
Earth Mover’s Distance (Lupu et al 2017) as our primary outcome. After
discussion with the developers of the measure, we decided not to use
this measure for two reasons: 1) it does not provide additional
information relative to simpler measures, and 2) the package to
implement the measure is also not operational.
- Deviation 3: We are unable to implement metric 3
and 4 as planned because we did not ask respondents what their top
priority was post-budget discussion. We thus cannot identify top
priorities among the respondents who did not have one budget category
with the highest amount of allocation.
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
P2a (H3.9a) table, Sarpanch and upa sarpanch post-private preferences, average difference; Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
10.122*** |
8.582*** |
11.694*** |
10.122*** |
7.642*** |
10.528*** |
10.122*** |
8.158*** |
10.730*** |
|
(1.032) |
(1.730) |
(2.379) |
(1.032) |
(1.984) |
(2.726) |
(1.032) |
(1.924) |
(2.890) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.388 |
-0.081 |
-0.167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.202) |
(1.272) |
(1.263) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.827 |
2.358 |
1.597 |
-0.827 |
-0.313 |
-0.823 |
-0.827 |
4.507 |
3.606 |
|
(1.280) |
(2.292) |
(2.463) |
(1.280) |
(2.306) |
(2.395) |
(1.280) |
(2.948) |
(3.238) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
0.335 |
0.133 |
0.191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.545) |
(1.633) |
(1.637) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-2.869 |
-3.697 |
|
-6.574* |
-7.112* |
|
-3.805 |
-4.714 |
|
|
(3.013) |
(3.132) |
|
(2.979) |
(3.349) |
|
(3.487) |
(3.827) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.439 |
0.242 |
|
0.925 |
0.501 |
|
0.347 |
0.433 |
|
|
(1.587) |
(1.656) |
|
(1.666) |
(1.784) |
|
(2.329) |
(2.360) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-1.156 |
-0.897 |
|
-1.620 |
-1.483 |
|
0.162 |
0.757 |
|
|
(1.003) |
(1.043) |
|
(1.147) |
(1.137) |
|
(1.315) |
(1.380) |
| Education above median |
|
0.861 |
0.620 |
|
2.133* |
2.064* |
|
0.164 |
-0.137 |
|
|
(0.799) |
(0.824) |
|
(0.971) |
(0.984) |
|
(1.005) |
(1.044) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.336 |
-0.359 |
|
0.580 |
-0.490 |
|
0.587 |
0.017 |
|
|
(0.776) |
(0.821) |
|
(0.926) |
(0.992) |
|
(0.943) |
(0.996) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-3.225+ |
-3.289+ |
|
-1.495 |
-1.586 |
|
-3.206 |
-3.472 |
|
|
(1.694) |
(1.812) |
|
(1.607) |
(1.667) |
|
(2.423) |
(2.617) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.580 |
-0.417 |
|
-0.703 |
-0.535 |
|
0.281 |
0.567 |
|
|
(0.865) |
(0.930) |
|
(1.063) |
(1.135) |
|
(1.051) |
(1.103) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.148 |
-0.019 |
|
0.158 |
0.031 |
|
0.093 |
-0.066 |
|
|
(0.265) |
(0.268) |
|
(0.321) |
(0.313) |
|
(0.323) |
(0.341) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.393 |
0.958 |
|
1.584 |
1.857 |
|
-1.602 |
-0.544 |
|
|
(1.292) |
(1.390) |
|
(1.439) |
(1.535) |
|
(1.793) |
(1.885) |
| SC quota |
|
1.252 |
1.581 |
|
1.558 |
2.212 |
|
1.495 |
1.469 |
|
|
(1.576) |
(1.624) |
|
(1.646) |
(1.788) |
|
(2.365) |
(2.349) |
| OBC quota |
|
2.277* |
2.233* |
|
2.840** |
2.837** |
|
1.040 |
0.729 |
|
|
(0.972) |
(1.019) |
|
(1.076) |
(1.086) |
|
(1.323) |
(1.395) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.391 |
2.076 |
|
6.836+ |
7.279+ |
|
0.165 |
1.015 |
|
|
(3.423) |
(3.592) |
|
(3.537) |
(3.904) |
|
(3.819) |
(4.153) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.038+ |
|
|
-0.027 |
|
|
-0.042 |
|
|
|
(0.021) |
|
|
(0.026) |
|
|
(0.026) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.007 |
|
|
-0.025 |
|
|
0.027 |
|
|
|
(0.030) |
|
|
(0.034) |
|
|
(0.042) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.580 |
|
|
0.346 |
|
|
0.301 |
|
|
|
(0.852) |
|
|
(1.026) |
|
|
(1.094) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-0.733 |
-0.495 |
-0.385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.367) |
(1.431) |
(1.434) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
1.189 |
0.890 |
0.791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.751) |
(1.879) |
(1.889) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.054 |
0.282 |
0.084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.338) |
(1.441) |
(1.459) |
| T2:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.607 |
-0.646 |
-0.508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.804) |
(1.887) |
(1.922) |
| Num.Obs. |
604 |
548 |
505 |
406 |
369 |
339 |
389 |
350 |
324 |
| R2 |
0.001 |
0.024 |
0.036 |
0.001 |
0.048 |
0.059 |
0.005 |
0.029 |
0.044 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
P2b (H3.9b) table, Sarpanch and gram sevak post-private preferences, average difference; Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
10.687*** |
9.569*** |
12.113*** |
10.687*** |
9.381*** |
12.577*** |
10.687*** |
10.338*** |
11.559*** |
|
(0.916) |
(1.595) |
(2.287) |
(0.916) |
(1.810) |
(2.642) |
(0.916) |
(1.940) |
(2.880) |
| Discussion rules |
0.548 |
1.259 |
0.806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.114) |
(1.182) |
(1.245) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.947 |
1.725 |
0.385 |
-0.947 |
1.314 |
0.190 |
-0.947 |
0.450 |
-1.161 |
|
(1.179) |
(2.280) |
(2.418) |
(1.179) |
(1.902) |
(2.071) |
(1.179) |
(3.161) |
(3.391) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
-1.240 |
-2.226 |
-1.721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.432) |
(1.484) |
(1.562) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-1.829 |
-2.197 |
|
-4.364 |
-5.905+ |
|
-3.430 |
-3.461 |
|
|
(2.992) |
(3.102) |
|
(3.508) |
(3.441) |
|
(3.428) |
(3.291) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.999 |
0.662 |
|
0.793 |
0.216 |
|
0.595 |
0.513 |
|
|
(1.330) |
(1.469) |
|
(1.506) |
(1.680) |
|
(2.033) |
(2.153) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.741 |
0.520 |
|
0.719 |
0.400 |
|
1.181 |
1.090 |
|
|
(0.901) |
(0.982) |
|
(1.061) |
(1.154) |
|
(1.216) |
(1.309) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.566 |
-0.428 |
|
-0.083 |
0.023 |
|
-0.913 |
-0.820 |
|
|
(0.715) |
(0.746) |
|
(0.854) |
(0.885) |
|
(0.931) |
(0.968) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.274 |
0.516 |
|
0.844 |
1.262 |
|
0.432 |
0.553 |
|
|
(0.721) |
(0.765) |
|
(0.847) |
(0.889) |
|
(0.923) |
(0.985) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-5.319** |
-4.837* |
|
-5.753*** |
-5.814*** |
|
-4.481 |
-3.720 |
|
|
(1.899) |
(2.018) |
|
(1.345) |
(1.410) |
|
(2.844) |
(3.126) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-1.679* |
-1.788* |
|
-2.607** |
-2.548* |
|
-1.164 |
-1.460 |
|
|
(0.758) |
(0.818) |
|
(0.937) |
(1.000) |
|
(0.958) |
(1.025) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.585* |
0.698** |
|
0.790** |
1.044*** |
|
0.368 |
0.308 |
|
|
(0.245) |
(0.258) |
|
(0.301) |
(0.308) |
|
(0.304) |
(0.318) |
| Gender quota |
|
2.183* |
2.772* |
|
2.452* |
3.244* |
|
2.735* |
3.450* |
|
|
(1.010) |
(1.093) |
|
(1.165) |
(1.262) |
|
(1.356) |
(1.363) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.167 |
0.124 |
|
-0.361 |
-0.120 |
|
-0.315 |
0.127 |
|
|
(1.291) |
(1.390) |
|
(1.409) |
(1.535) |
|
(2.032) |
(2.102) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.747 |
0.714 |
|
0.710 |
0.712 |
|
-0.618 |
-0.683 |
|
|
(0.927) |
(0.995) |
|
(1.086) |
(1.143) |
|
(1.227) |
(1.320) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.765 |
1.747 |
|
5.862 |
6.756+ |
|
4.012 |
4.405 |
|
|
(3.364) |
(3.526) |
|
(3.974) |
(4.023) |
|
(4.050) |
(3.999) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.028 |
|
|
-0.039+ |
|
|
-0.000 |
|
|
|
(0.018) |
|
|
(0.024) |
|
|
(0.022) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.027 |
|
|
-0.021 |
|
|
-0.044 |
|
|
|
(0.029) |
|
|
(0.033) |
|
|
(0.041) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.622 |
|
|
-1.443 |
|
|
-0.019 |
|
|
|
(0.745) |
|
|
(0.876) |
|
|
(0.928) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.462 |
0.931 |
0.123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.308) |
(1.364) |
(1.400) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
-0.727 |
-1.649 |
-0.663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.635) |
(1.647) |
(1.721) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.630 |
1.423 |
1.329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.259) |
(1.364) |
(1.444) |
| T2:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1.833 |
-2.543 |
-2.693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.674) |
(1.759) |
(1.852) |
| Num.Obs. |
605 |
549 |
506 |
407 |
370 |
340 |
390 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.013 |
0.061 |
0.071 |
0.007 |
0.085 |
0.112 |
0.016 |
0.050 |
0.059 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
P2a (H3.9a) table, Sarpanch and upa sarpanch post-private preferences, average difference; Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
8.755*** |
8.227*** |
11.167*** |
8.755*** |
7.143*** |
9.908*** |
8.755*** |
8.061*** |
10.397*** |
|
(0.661) |
(1.513) |
(2.236) |
(0.661) |
(1.796) |
(2.605) |
(0.661) |
(1.789) |
(2.805) |
| Discussion rules |
0.589 |
0.421 |
0.477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.864) |
(0.917) |
(0.932) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch SC |
2.717+ |
1.493 |
1.518 |
2.717+ |
1.406 |
1.238 |
2.717+ |
1.318 |
1.629 |
|
(1.443) |
(1.992) |
(2.048) |
(1.443) |
(2.070) |
(2.165) |
(1.443) |
(2.421) |
(2.447) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch SC |
-2.332 |
-1.499 |
-1.825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.693) |
(1.803) |
(1.850) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
2.441 |
1.701 |
|
0.253 |
-0.329 |
|
4.022 |
3.182 |
|
|
(1.992) |
(2.203) |
|
(2.001) |
(2.078) |
|
(2.897) |
(3.230) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-2.946 |
-3.759 |
|
-6.541* |
-7.081* |
|
-3.886 |
-4.783 |
|
|
(3.064) |
(3.193) |
|
(2.952) |
(3.392) |
|
(3.644) |
(4.015) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-1.155 |
-0.890 |
|
-1.617 |
-1.469 |
|
0.182 |
0.792 |
|
|
(1.003) |
(1.043) |
|
(1.151) |
(1.139) |
|
(1.312) |
(1.376) |
| Education above median |
|
0.858 |
0.617 |
|
2.144* |
2.072* |
|
0.175 |
-0.131 |
|
|
(0.799) |
(0.823) |
|
(0.969) |
(0.981) |
|
(1.008) |
(1.047) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.326 |
-0.394 |
|
0.545 |
-0.533 |
|
0.582 |
-0.041 |
|
|
(0.773) |
(0.819) |
|
(0.918) |
(0.988) |
|
(0.941) |
(0.992) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-3.215+ |
-3.289+ |
|
-1.488 |
-1.578 |
|
-3.174 |
-3.485 |
|
|
(1.723) |
(1.845) |
|
(1.645) |
(1.699) |
|
(2.484) |
(2.698) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.585 |
-0.427 |
|
-0.689 |
-0.545 |
|
0.285 |
0.585 |
|
|
(0.862) |
(0.926) |
|
(1.061) |
(1.132) |
|
(1.045) |
(1.093) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.157 |
-0.012 |
|
0.172 |
0.037 |
|
0.108 |
-0.045 |
|
|
(0.264) |
(0.267) |
|
(0.319) |
(0.312) |
|
(0.323) |
(0.340) |
| Gender quota |
|
0.400 |
0.995 |
|
1.509 |
1.807 |
|
-1.481 |
-0.374 |
|
|
(1.270) |
(1.355) |
|
(1.428) |
(1.506) |
|
(1.755) |
(1.820) |
| SC quota |
|
1.244 |
1.570 |
|
1.573 |
2.164 |
|
1.580 |
1.617 |
|
|
(1.574) |
(1.624) |
|
(1.663) |
(1.808) |
|
(2.396) |
(2.380) |
| OBC quota |
|
2.248* |
2.184* |
|
2.851** |
2.820* |
|
0.955 |
0.630 |
|
|
(0.979) |
(1.024) |
|
(1.083) |
(1.091) |
|
(1.334) |
(1.401) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.530 |
2.250 |
|
6.840+ |
7.313+ |
|
0.415 |
1.358 |
|
|
(3.459) |
(3.636) |
|
(3.493) |
(3.921) |
|
(3.958) |
(4.316) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.037+ |
|
|
-0.026 |
|
|
-0.040 |
|
|
|
(0.021) |
|
|
(0.026) |
|
|
(0.026) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.005 |
|
|
-0.023 |
|
|
0.029 |
|
|
|
(0.030) |
|
|
(0.034) |
|
|
(0.042) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.557 |
|
|
0.344 |
|
|
0.234 |
|
|
|
(0.849) |
|
|
(1.018) |
|
|
(1.094) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.429 |
0.274 |
0.435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.985) |
(1.038) |
(1.057) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
-1.349 |
-0.863 |
-1.249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.907) |
(2.086) |
(2.148) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.777 |
0.489 |
0.544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.083) |
(1.157) |
(1.198) |
| T2:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3.285+ |
-1.975 |
-2.506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.923) |
(2.058) |
(2.127) |
| Num.Obs. |
602 |
548 |
505 |
405 |
369 |
339 |
388 |
350 |
324 |
| R2 |
0.007 |
0.025 |
0.038 |
0.013 |
0.048 |
0.059 |
0.011 |
0.031 |
0.048 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
P2b (H3.9b) table, Sarpanch and gram sevak post-private preferences, average difference; Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
10.704*** |
11.087*** |
13.635*** |
10.704*** |
10.322*** |
13.205*** |
10.704*** |
11.604*** |
13.327*** |
|
(0.679) |
(1.476) |
(2.202) |
(0.679) |
(1.719) |
(2.558) |
(0.679) |
(1.864) |
(2.852) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.780 |
-0.764 |
-1.001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.850) |
(0.874) |
(0.930) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch SC |
-2.029 |
-0.605 |
-1.134 |
-2.029 |
-0.162 |
-0.740 |
-2.029 |
-0.592 |
-0.873 |
|
(1.274) |
(1.717) |
(1.849) |
(1.274) |
(1.833) |
(2.006) |
(1.274) |
(2.177) |
(2.298) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch SC |
2.399 |
2.360 |
2.595+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.521) |
(1.499) |
(1.554) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
0.159 |
-0.769 |
|
0.260 |
-0.244 |
|
-0.634 |
-2.169 |
|
|
(2.098) |
(2.249) |
|
(1.624) |
(1.805) |
|
(3.190) |
(3.489) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-1.865 |
-2.252 |
|
-4.412 |
-5.882 |
|
-3.425 |
-3.545 |
|
|
(3.122) |
(3.207) |
|
(3.750) |
(3.615) |
|
(3.457) |
(3.311) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.728 |
0.499 |
|
0.712 |
0.386 |
|
1.127 |
0.999 |
|
|
(0.896) |
(0.977) |
|
(1.052) |
(1.148) |
|
(1.213) |
(1.313) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.565 |
-0.426 |
|
-0.103 |
0.015 |
|
-0.885 |
-0.780 |
|
|
(0.717) |
(0.747) |
|
(0.858) |
(0.888) |
|
(0.931) |
(0.969) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.348 |
0.598 |
|
0.909 |
1.307 |
|
0.537 |
0.697 |
|
|
(0.723) |
(0.766) |
|
(0.854) |
(0.894) |
|
(0.922) |
(0.985) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-5.356** |
-4.861* |
|
-5.764*** |
-5.819*** |
|
-4.556 |
-3.817 |
|
|
(1.894) |
(2.020) |
|
(1.256) |
(1.368) |
|
(2.904) |
(3.219) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-1.700* |
-1.785* |
|
-2.629** |
-2.530* |
|
-1.188 |
-1.482 |
|
|
(0.756) |
(0.818) |
|
(0.936) |
(1.000) |
|
(0.953) |
(1.021) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.565* |
0.687** |
|
0.763* |
1.037*** |
|
0.355 |
0.289 |
|
|
(0.245) |
(0.258) |
|
(0.303) |
(0.308) |
|
(0.304) |
(0.317) |
| Gender quota |
|
2.207* |
2.719* |
|
2.596* |
3.298** |
|
2.520+ |
3.089* |
|
|
(1.001) |
(1.084) |
|
(1.159) |
(1.256) |
|
(1.351) |
(1.367) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.272 |
0.077 |
|
-0.382 |
-0.035 |
|
-0.632 |
-0.237 |
|
|
(1.275) |
(1.381) |
|
(1.399) |
(1.536) |
|
(2.003) |
(2.100) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.736 |
0.756 |
|
0.693 |
0.746 |
|
-0.593 |
-0.587 |
|
|
(0.921) |
(0.991) |
|
(1.067) |
(1.130) |
|
(1.226) |
(1.325) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.715 |
1.648 |
|
5.840 |
6.655 |
|
3.874 |
4.213 |
|
|
(3.484) |
(3.630) |
|
(4.191) |
(4.181) |
|
(4.103) |
(4.061) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.031+ |
|
|
-0.041+ |
|
|
-0.005 |
|
|
|
(0.018) |
|
|
(0.024) |
|
|
(0.022) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.030 |
|
|
-0.023 |
|
|
-0.050 |
|
|
|
(0.029) |
|
|
(0.033) |
|
|
(0.040) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.587 |
|
|
-1.436 |
|
|
0.093 |
|
|
|
(0.746) |
|
|
(0.877) |
|
|
(0.937) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-0.490 |
-0.522 |
-0.724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.951) |
(0.969) |
(1.026) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
2.088 |
1.703 |
1.620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.719) |
(1.666) |
(1.720) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1.121 |
-0.867 |
-1.218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.042) |
(1.085) |
(1.152) |
| T2:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.759 |
2.695 |
3.124+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.759) |
(1.784) |
(1.881) |
| Num.Obs. |
603 |
549 |
506 |
406 |
370 |
340 |
389 |
351 |
325 |
| R2 |
0.005 |
0.061 |
0.073 |
0.007 |
0.085 |
0.113 |
0.008 |
0.050 |
0.060 |
P3 (H3.10): Distance between the sarpanch’s pre-treatment
private preferences and other actors’ post-treatment private preferences
should be smaller in treated groups (T1 + T2, considered jointly) than
control groups.
- P3 is assessed by regressing each of these four metrics (in this
case, comparing the sarpanch’s pre-treatment preferences to the
post-treatment preferences of other actors) on treatment status (T1 or
T2 versus Control). We also control for the potential presence of a
sarpanch relative during the interview (“the interview” being here
understood as the group interview), both separately and in interaction
with the gender of the sarpanch. We repeat this exercise twice. P3a
tests the difference between the sarpanch’s pre-treatment allocation and
the upa-sarpanch’s post-treatment allocation. P3b tests the difference
between the sarpanch’s pre-treatment allocation and the gram sevak’s
post-treatment allocation.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2.
- We run bivariate regressions, clustering at the taluka level.
- We also include the series of individual and village level
demographic controls presented in G2.
- Deviation 1: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
- Deviation 2: We originally planed to use the
Earth Mover’s Distance (Lupu et al 2017) as our primary outcome. After
discussion with the developers of the measure, we decided not to use
this measure for two reasons: 1) it does not provide additional
information relative to simpler measures, and 2) the package to
implement the measure is also not operational.
- Deviation 3: We are unable to implement metric 3
as planned because we did not ask respondents what their top priority
was post-budget discussion. We thus cannot identify top priorities among
the respondents who did not have one budget category with the highest
amount of allocation.
| |
DV: Sarpanch pre- upa sarpanch post- average distance |
DV: Sarpanch pre- upa sarpanch post- distance from sarpanch's top priority |
P3a (H3.10a) table, grouping T1/T2 together, sarpanch pre- upa sarpanch post-
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
21.637*** |
19.840*** |
26.025*** |
47.176*** |
41.822*** |
62.436*** |
|
(0.792) |
(2.042) |
(2.948) |
(2.271) |
(5.886) |
(8.493) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.052 |
-0.408 |
-0.492 |
0.369 |
-0.950 |
-2.038 |
|
(0.981) |
(1.049) |
(1.099) |
(2.818) |
(3.005) |
(3.132) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
7.122* |
5.611+ |
|
19.305* |
13.986 |
|
|
(2.757) |
(2.988) |
|
(8.229) |
(8.831) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.018 |
-1.438 |
|
-0.410 |
-5.028 |
|
|
(5.097) |
(5.813) |
|
(12.233) |
(15.260) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
1.762 |
1.322 |
|
-2.035 |
-3.650 |
|
|
(2.214) |
(2.281) |
|
(6.451) |
(6.683) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.042 |
-0.043 |
|
-1.621 |
-1.437 |
|
|
(1.473) |
(1.558) |
|
(4.224) |
(4.473) |
| Education above median |
|
0.720 |
0.127 |
|
1.587 |
-0.104 |
|
|
(1.035) |
(1.070) |
|
(3.011) |
(3.096) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.441 |
-0.737 |
|
-2.017 |
-2.847 |
|
|
(1.020) |
(1.070) |
|
(2.972) |
(3.121) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-3.442 |
-3.359 |
|
-6.804 |
-6.191 |
|
|
(2.511) |
(2.584) |
|
(7.577) |
(7.673) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.664 |
1.640 |
|
2.774 |
5.305 |
|
|
(1.107) |
(1.153) |
|
(3.253) |
(3.389) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.188 |
0.144 |
|
0.329 |
0.206 |
|
|
(0.340) |
(0.357) |
|
(0.981) |
(1.027) |
| Gender quota |
|
-2.113 |
-0.180 |
|
-6.578 |
-0.913 |
|
|
(1.589) |
(1.753) |
|
(4.675) |
(5.181) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.172 |
-0.834 |
|
6.817 |
5.075 |
|
|
(2.208) |
(2.277) |
|
(6.363) |
(6.584) |
| OBC quota |
|
-1.231 |
-1.151 |
|
-0.781 |
-0.688 |
|
|
(1.436) |
(1.519) |
|
(4.182) |
(4.427) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-3.505 |
-3.337 |
|
-7.642 |
-7.042 |
|
|
(5.560) |
(6.263) |
|
(13.822) |
(16.651) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.085** |
|
|
-0.281*** |
|
|
|
(0.027) |
|
|
(0.073) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.014 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.118) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.212 |
|
|
-1.531 |
|
|
|
(1.091) |
|
|
(3.192) |
| Num.Obs. |
592 |
536 |
494 |
594 |
538 |
497 |
| R2 |
0.000 |
0.027 |
0.051 |
0.000 |
0.028 |
0.056 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch pre- upa sarpanch post- average distance |
DV: Sarpanch pre- upa sarpanch post- distance from sarpanch's top priority |
P3a (H3.10a) table, T1 versus control, sarpanch pre- upa sarpanch post-
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
21.637*** |
20.770*** |
26.266*** |
47.990*** |
44.309*** |
63.296*** |
|
(0.792) |
(2.366) |
(3.415) |
(1.654) |
(6.929) |
(10.186) |
| T1 |
0.061 |
0.076 |
0.057 |
-1.605 |
-0.944 |
-2.013 |
|
(1.117) |
(1.210) |
(1.284) |
(2.850) |
(3.482) |
(3.669) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
6.555* |
4.998+ |
|
16.922+ |
11.880 |
|
|
(2.959) |
(2.993) |
|
(9.005) |
(8.847) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-1.012 |
-3.208 |
|
-8.759 |
-17.198 |
|
|
(9.573) |
(10.559) |
|
(20.210) |
(23.944) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.718 |
0.642 |
|
-7.973 |
-8.532 |
|
|
(2.602) |
(2.583) |
|
(7.648) |
(7.745) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-2.602 |
-2.376 |
|
-10.446* |
-9.240+ |
|
|
(1.712) |
(1.769) |
|
(4.932) |
(5.096) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.196 |
-0.621 |
|
-1.115 |
-2.431 |
|
|
(1.250) |
(1.279) |
|
(3.696) |
(3.779) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.995 |
0.487 |
|
1.762 |
0.538 |
|
|
(1.223) |
(1.305) |
|
(3.584) |
(3.832) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-4.102 |
-4.226+ |
|
-6.841 |
-7.633 |
|
|
(2.603) |
(2.454) |
|
(8.168) |
(7.466) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.890 |
1.377 |
|
3.396 |
4.470 |
|
|
(1.357) |
(1.401) |
|
(3.938) |
(4.087) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.097 |
-0.050 |
|
-0.539 |
-0.310 |
|
|
(0.420) |
(0.439) |
|
(1.220) |
(1.269) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.757 |
1.316 |
|
-2.797 |
2.965 |
|
|
(1.766) |
(1.930) |
|
(5.226) |
(5.707) |
| SC quota |
|
0.305 |
-0.458 |
|
10.474 |
8.291 |
|
|
(2.593) |
(2.601) |
|
(7.478) |
(7.619) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.182 |
-0.375 |
|
4.504 |
3.699 |
|
|
(1.621) |
(1.673) |
|
(4.759) |
(4.895) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.485 |
1.827 |
|
12.007 |
14.718 |
|
|
(9.854) |
(10.798) |
|
(21.382) |
(24.924) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.079* |
|
|
-0.265** |
|
|
|
(0.033) |
|
|
(0.094) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.003 |
|
|
0.040 |
|
|
|
(0.049) |
|
|
(0.144) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.181 |
|
|
-1.206 |
|
|
|
(1.318) |
|
|
(3.855) |
| Num.Obs. |
395 |
358 |
329 |
594 |
359 |
331 |
| R2 |
0.000 |
0.034 |
0.052 |
0.001 |
0.043 |
0.061 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch pre- upa sarpanch post- average distance |
DV: Sarpanch pre- upa sarpanch post- distance from sarpanch's top priority |
P3a (H3.10a) table, T2 versus control, sarpanch pre- upa sarpanch post-
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
21.637*** |
17.841*** |
23.268*** |
46.760*** |
35.826*** |
53.676*** |
|
(0.792) |
(2.472) |
(3.861) |
(1.626) |
(7.040) |
(10.799) |
| T2 |
-0.172 |
-0.467 |
-0.733 |
2.003 |
0.265 |
-1.146 |
|
(1.164) |
(1.252) |
(1.307) |
(2.900) |
(3.550) |
(3.693) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
7.871+ |
7.169 |
|
24.035* |
21.440 |
|
|
(4.119) |
(4.697) |
|
(11.967) |
(13.500) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
2.201 |
0.903 |
|
1.542 |
-2.238 |
|
|
(6.106) |
(6.895) |
|
(14.467) |
(17.918) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
2.871 |
2.058 |
|
5.348 |
2.443 |
|
|
(3.175) |
(3.290) |
|
(8.492) |
(8.805) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
2.429 |
2.478 |
|
7.168 |
7.767 |
|
|
(1.923) |
(2.072) |
|
(5.356) |
(5.810) |
| Education above median |
|
1.706 |
0.979 |
|
6.294+ |
4.626 |
|
|
(1.315) |
(1.365) |
|
(3.717) |
(3.845) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.690 |
-1.030 |
|
-2.902 |
-4.010 |
|
|
(1.254) |
(1.315) |
|
(3.597) |
(3.775) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-3.115 |
-2.950 |
|
-8.810 |
-7.844 |
|
|
(3.771) |
(4.101) |
|
(11.094) |
(11.928) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
1.377 |
2.651+ |
|
4.024 |
7.250+ |
|
|
(1.380) |
(1.441) |
|
(4.025) |
(4.175) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.126 |
-0.140 |
|
0.135 |
-0.354 |
|
|
(0.429) |
(0.470) |
|
(1.206) |
(1.311) |
| Gender quota |
|
-2.030 |
-1.024 |
|
-7.021 |
-4.310 |
|
|
(2.226) |
(2.492) |
|
(6.157) |
(6.784) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.939 |
-1.128 |
|
2.235 |
2.013 |
|
|
(3.238) |
(3.357) |
|
(8.618) |
(8.944) |
| OBC quota |
|
-1.968 |
-1.917 |
|
-5.590 |
-5.489 |
|
|
(1.889) |
(2.014) |
|
(5.333) |
(5.717) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-6.625 |
-5.239 |
|
-10.034 |
-6.791 |
|
|
(6.680) |
(7.444) |
|
(16.562) |
(19.751) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.072* |
|
|
-0.244** |
|
|
|
(0.034) |
|
|
(0.092) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
-0.018 |
|
|
-0.013 |
|
|
|
(0.059) |
|
|
(0.162) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.346 |
|
|
-0.606 |
|
|
|
(1.397) |
|
|
(4.010) |
| Num.Obs. |
383 |
344 |
319 |
594 |
347 |
322 |
| R2 |
0.000 |
0.042 |
0.062 |
0.001 |
0.047 |
0.073 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch pre- gram sevak post- average distance |
DV: Sarpanch pre- gram sevak post- distance from sarpanch's top priority |
P3b (H3.10b) table, grouping T1/T2 together, sarpanch pre- gram sevak post-
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to discussion rules (1) versus not (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
23.412*** |
23.006*** |
28.183*** |
50.974*** |
45.132*** |
63.050*** |
|
(0.763) |
(1.958) |
(2.753) |
(2.266) |
(5.810) |
(8.093) |
| Discussion rules |
-1.089 |
-1.655 |
-2.416* |
-1.560 |
-3.210 |
-5.883+ |
|
(0.947) |
(1.007) |
(1.043) |
(2.782) |
(2.963) |
(3.061) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
6.758* |
4.776 |
|
18.288* |
11.050 |
|
|
(2.819) |
(3.069) |
|
(8.618) |
(9.064) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.834 |
0.557 |
|
-3.180 |
-7.708 |
|
|
(5.518) |
(5.830) |
|
(15.530) |
(18.053) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
2.220 |
1.886 |
|
0.813 |
-0.842 |
|
|
(1.925) |
(2.101) |
|
(5.608) |
(6.038) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.094 |
0.008 |
|
-1.028 |
-0.891 |
|
|
(1.409) |
(1.518) |
|
(3.990) |
(4.271) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.454 |
-1.181 |
|
0.285 |
-1.988 |
|
|
(0.987) |
(1.004) |
|
(2.881) |
(2.917) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.222 |
-0.477 |
|
-0.086 |
-1.215 |
|
|
(0.990) |
(1.031) |
|
(2.901) |
(3.003) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-3.110 |
-2.244 |
|
-4.163 |
-1.614 |
|
|
(2.448) |
(2.557) |
|
(7.629) |
(7.651) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.279 |
0.965 |
|
2.023 |
4.178 |
|
|
(1.098) |
(1.152) |
|
(3.242) |
(3.388) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.081 |
0.086 |
|
0.347 |
0.471 |
|
|
(0.330) |
(0.347) |
|
(0.948) |
(0.998) |
| Gender quota |
|
-2.973+ |
-1.527 |
|
-9.457* |
-4.626 |
|
|
(1.649) |
(1.828) |
|
(4.667) |
(5.164) |
| SC quota |
|
-1.212 |
-1.710 |
|
5.090 |
4.279 |
|
|
(1.901) |
(2.055) |
|
(5.510) |
(5.880) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.066 |
0.113 |
|
1.330 |
1.881 |
|
|
(1.393) |
(1.481) |
|
(3.988) |
(4.236) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-5.443 |
-5.256 |
|
-5.835 |
-3.737 |
|
|
(6.018) |
(6.343) |
|
(16.946) |
(19.368) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.093*** |
|
|
-0.288*** |
|
|
|
(0.024) |
|
|
(0.066) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.072+ |
|
|
0.187 |
|
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.118) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.064 |
|
|
-1.370 |
|
|
|
(1.045) |
|
|
(3.055) |
| Num.Obs. |
593 |
537 |
495 |
595 |
539 |
498 |
| R2 |
0.002 |
0.025 |
0.061 |
0.001 |
0.028 |
0.065 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch pre- gram sevak post- average distance |
DV: Sarpanch pre- gram sevak post- distance from sarpanch's top priority |
P3b (H3.10b) table, T1 versus control, sarpanch pre- gram sevak post-
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T1 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
23.412*** |
24.177*** |
29.307*** |
50.470*** |
47.487*** |
64.731*** |
|
(0.763) |
(2.223) |
(3.008) |
(1.631) |
(6.608) |
(9.183) |
| T1 |
-1.042 |
-1.604 |
-2.587* |
-1.605 |
-3.618 |
-7.064* |
|
(1.076) |
(1.152) |
(1.206) |
(2.758) |
(3.403) |
(3.554) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
7.693** |
6.150+ |
|
19.820* |
14.587 |
|
|
(2.927) |
(3.218) |
|
(9.276) |
(9.719) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.975 |
-1.270 |
|
-13.862 |
-24.255 |
|
|
(8.265) |
(8.612) |
|
(22.556) |
(24.926) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.552 |
-0.264 |
|
-8.633 |
-8.348 |
|
|
(2.065) |
(2.164) |
|
(6.358) |
(6.601) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-2.208 |
-1.429 |
|
-7.956+ |
-5.761 |
|
|
(1.616) |
(1.699) |
|
(4.667) |
(4.923) |
| Education above median |
|
-1.344 |
-2.315+ |
|
-1.329 |
-4.263 |
|
|
(1.192) |
(1.199) |
|
(3.527) |
(3.571) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.612 |
0.325 |
|
3.034 |
2.036 |
|
|
(1.175) |
(1.228) |
|
(3.487) |
(3.653) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-4.743+ |
-4.675+ |
|
-7.496 |
-7.884 |
|
|
(2.497) |
(2.647) |
|
(8.264) |
(8.184) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.500 |
0.606 |
|
1.468 |
1.980 |
|
|
(1.285) |
(1.328) |
|
(3.874) |
(4.007) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.005 |
0.132 |
|
0.328 |
0.837 |
|
|
(0.402) |
(0.418) |
|
(1.173) |
(1.231) |
| Gender quota |
|
-2.719 |
-1.255 |
|
-8.736+ |
-4.426 |
|
|
(1.827) |
(1.962) |
|
(5.168) |
(5.606) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.268 |
-0.920 |
|
9.706 |
8.689 |
|
|
(2.012) |
(2.100) |
|
(6.148) |
(6.310) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.687 |
0.479 |
|
5.022 |
4.486 |
|
|
(1.582) |
(1.630) |
|
(4.637) |
(4.817) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-1.666 |
0.064 |
|
15.641 |
22.849 |
|
|
(8.647) |
(8.982) |
|
(23.744) |
(26.016) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.103*** |
|
|
-0.302*** |
|
|
|
(0.028) |
|
|
(0.079) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.106* |
|
|
0.255+ |
|
|
|
(0.044) |
|
|
(0.131) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.141 |
|
|
-0.355 |
|
|
|
(1.207) |
|
|
(3.615) |
| Num.Obs. |
396 |
359 |
330 |
595 |
360 |
332 |
| R2 |
0.002 |
0.034 |
0.085 |
0.001 |
0.039 |
0.082 |
| |
DV: Sarpanch pre- gram sevak post- average distance |
DV: Sarpanch pre- gram sevak post- distance from sarpanch's top priority |
P3b (H3.10b) table, T2 versus control, sarpanch pre- gram sevak post-
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to T2 (1) versus control (0). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
23.412*** |
21.865*** |
25.731*** |
49.869*** |
41.526*** |
57.215*** |
|
(0.763) |
(2.445) |
(3.625) |
(1.587) |
(7.300) |
(10.571) |
| T2 |
-1.138 |
-1.413 |
-2.141+ |
0.121 |
-2.176 |
-4.507 |
|
(1.130) |
(1.211) |
(1.249) |
(2.834) |
(3.501) |
(3.589) |
| Sarpanch woman |
|
4.259 |
1.690 |
|
14.370 |
5.480 |
|
|
(4.139) |
(4.232) |
|
(12.605) |
(12.876) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
2.702 |
1.681 |
|
-1.124 |
-5.107 |
|
|
(7.142) |
(7.267) |
|
(19.233) |
(21.834) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
3.813 |
3.322 |
|
7.593 |
4.623 |
|
|
(2.682) |
(2.849) |
|
(7.165) |
(7.682) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
2.246 |
2.167 |
|
7.086 |
6.854 |
|
|
(1.813) |
(1.994) |
|
(5.125) |
(5.563) |
| Education above median |
|
0.540 |
0.238 |
|
4.240 |
3.107 |
|
|
(1.244) |
(1.283) |
|
(3.620) |
(3.683) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.566 |
-0.839 |
|
-1.651 |
-3.412 |
|
|
(1.240) |
(1.300) |
|
(3.605) |
(3.739) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.915 |
1.403 |
|
-1.058 |
5.114 |
|
|
(3.584) |
(3.496) |
|
(11.249) |
(11.119) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.036 |
0.727 |
|
1.498 |
4.076 |
|
|
(1.407) |
(1.481) |
|
(4.166) |
(4.362) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.022 |
-0.196 |
|
-0.086 |
-0.344 |
|
|
(0.416) |
(0.450) |
|
(1.185) |
(1.272) |
| Gender quota |
|
-1.617 |
-0.577 |
|
-6.353 |
-2.528 |
|
|
(2.190) |
(2.399) |
|
(6.037) |
(6.479) |
| SC quota |
|
-1.861 |
-2.444 |
|
2.158 |
1.719 |
|
|
(2.644) |
(2.799) |
|
(7.078) |
(7.573) |
| OBC quota |
|
-1.406 |
-1.269 |
|
-3.494 |
-2.950 |
|
|
(1.797) |
(1.960) |
|
(5.121) |
(5.534) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-6.050 |
-5.248 |
|
-5.039 |
-0.570 |
|
|
(7.808) |
(7.935) |
|
(21.249) |
(23.618) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.076* |
|
|
-0.248** |
|
|
|
(0.031) |
|
|
(0.083) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.064 |
|
|
0.139 |
|
|
|
(0.062) |
|
|
(0.170) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.909 |
|
|
0.261 |
|
|
|
(1.335) |
|
|
(3.881) |
| Num.Obs. |
384 |
345 |
320 |
595 |
348 |
323 |
| R2 |
0.003 |
0.028 |
0.055 |
0.000 |
0.035 |
0.061 |
Third group of hypotheses: Collective Preferences
This measures the extent to which the collective preference reported
by the group (the outcome of their collective deliberation) has
changed.
CP1 (H3.12): The distance between (post-treatment) private
preferences of sarpanch and outcome of group decision making should be
lower for treated (T1, T2) groups than for those not treated
(Control).
- CP1 is assessed using differences between the private
(post-treatment) preferences of the sarpanch versus the group decision,
comparing the mean “preference difference” across treatment status (T1
or T2 versus Control). We use each of the three metrics above to run
this comparison.
- Metric 1: average distance in allocation across the 5 priorities.
This metric is by far the most sophisticated of the three. Practically,
we calculate the difference in %age allocated to each item across the
two distributions; we subsequently average this difference (that is, we
compute the total difference across the five items and divide this total
difference by 5). Proceeding in this manner, we obtain a number between
0 and 100, with 100 being a most different allocation across the five
items.
- Metric 2. Binary measure coding whether the two distributions
identify the same priority as the “top” priority (that is, the priority
allocated the largest %age.
- Metric 3: Continuous measure identifying the distance between the
%age of funds allocated to the “top” priority across the two
allocations.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2.
- We also include the series of individual and village level
demographic controls presented in G2.
- We also include a control for the potential presence of a sarpanch
relative during the interview, both separately and in interaction with
the gender of the sarpanch.
- Deviation 1: We originally planed to use the
Earth Mover’s Distance (Lupu et al 2017) as our primary outcome. After
discussion with the developers of the measure, we decided not to use
this measure for two reasons: 1) it does not provide additional
information relative to simpler measures, and 2) the package to
implement the measure is also not operational.
- Deviation 2: We are unable to implement metric 2
as planned because we did not ask respondents what their top priority
was post-budget discussion. We thus cannot identify top priorities among
the respondents who did not have one budget category with the highest
amount of allocation.
- Deviation 3: We are unable to implement metric 3
as planned because we did not ask respondents what their top priority
was post-budget discussion. We thus cannot identify top priorities among
the respondents who did not have one budget category with the highest
amount of allocation.
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP1 (H3.12) table, Sarpanch post- and collective group preferences, average difference
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
12.152*** |
13.649*** |
12.474*** |
12.152*** |
12.865*** |
11.052*** |
12.152*** |
13.525*** |
12.718*** |
|
(0.660) |
(1.652) |
(2.355) |
(0.660) |
(1.930) |
(2.890) |
(0.660) |
(2.057) |
(2.872) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.014 |
0.030 |
-0.026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.809) |
(0.854) |
(0.882) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
0.256 |
-0.619 |
|
-1.920 |
-2.417 |
|
2.646 |
1.332 |
|
|
(2.532) |
(2.758) |
|
(2.556) |
(2.672) |
|
(3.502) |
(4.062) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-3.610 |
-3.460 |
|
-8.067*** |
-7.580* |
|
-3.271 |
-3.238 |
|
|
(3.477) |
(3.459) |
|
(2.322) |
(3.100) |
|
(4.438) |
(4.263) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.526 |
0.590 |
|
0.762 |
1.092 |
|
-1.617 |
-1.449 |
|
|
(1.774) |
(1.894) |
|
(1.996) |
(2.176) |
|
(2.472) |
(2.626) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.141 |
0.255 |
|
-0.657 |
-0.077 |
|
0.307 |
0.820 |
|
|
(1.108) |
(1.187) |
|
(1.380) |
(1.451) |
|
(1.340) |
(1.445) |
| Education above median |
|
-1.468+ |
-1.687+ |
|
-1.259 |
-1.877+ |
|
-0.663 |
-0.818 |
|
|
(0.859) |
(0.902) |
|
(1.071) |
(1.101) |
|
(1.078) |
(1.139) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.309 |
-0.249 |
|
0.526 |
-0.101 |
|
0.037 |
-0.494 |
|
|
(0.840) |
(0.888) |
|
(1.009) |
(1.055) |
|
(1.055) |
(1.119) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-1.649 |
-0.948 |
|
1.036 |
1.289 |
|
-3.489 |
-2.992 |
|
|
(2.361) |
(2.506) |
|
(2.337) |
(2.337) |
|
(3.336) |
(3.758) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-2.216* |
-2.060* |
|
-2.221* |
-1.625 |
|
-2.932** |
-3.423** |
|
|
(0.882) |
(0.954) |
|
(1.092) |
(1.176) |
|
(1.064) |
(1.115) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.105 |
0.175 |
|
0.151 |
0.161 |
|
0.124 |
0.240 |
|
|
(0.298) |
(0.313) |
|
(0.353) |
(0.359) |
|
(0.377) |
(0.395) |
| Gender quota |
|
1.205 |
1.441 |
|
1.493 |
1.831 |
|
0.839 |
1.394 |
|
|
(1.143) |
(1.271) |
|
(1.345) |
(1.490) |
|
(1.382) |
(1.525) |
| SC quota |
|
0.471 |
0.977 |
|
0.088 |
0.182 |
|
2.987 |
3.691 |
|
|
(1.746) |
(1.865) |
|
(1.925) |
(2.110) |
|
(2.453) |
(2.605) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.221 |
-0.134 |
|
0.610 |
0.739 |
|
-0.684 |
-0.796 |
|
|
(1.138) |
(1.229) |
|
(1.405) |
(1.487) |
|
(1.369) |
(1.489) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.234 |
-1.014 |
|
5.039+ |
3.716 |
|
-1.842 |
-2.279 |
|
|
(3.824) |
(3.861) |
|
(2.947) |
(3.652) |
|
(4.918) |
(4.787) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.014 |
|
|
0.020 |
|
|
0.020 |
|
|
|
(0.020) |
|
|
(0.025) |
|
|
(0.025) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.013 |
|
|
0.043 |
|
|
-0.010 |
|
|
|
(0.035) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.045) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.503 |
|
|
-1.004 |
|
|
-0.508 |
|
|
|
(0.886) |
|
|
(1.063) |
|
|
(1.108) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-0.682 |
-0.591 |
-0.650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.903) |
(0.963) |
(1.002) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.716 |
0.598 |
0.531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.968) |
(1.033) |
(1.083) |
| Num.Obs. |
595 |
540 |
498 |
400 |
364 |
334 |
382 |
344 |
319 |
| R2 |
0.000 |
0.032 |
0.040 |
0.001 |
0.041 |
0.054 |
0.001 |
0.052 |
0.068 |
CP2 (H3.13): [Heterogeneous treatment effects] the effect of the
treatment, as implied by CP1, should be larger if the sarpanch belongs
to a disadvantaged category (CP2a) or if the gram sevak is female
(CP2b).
- CP2 is assessed using a regression interacting sarpanch and/or gram
sevak characteristics with treatment status for each relevant dependent
variable. Our focus is on the interaction term; we cluster on
administrative block level. We use the same three measures of preference
distance outlined in CP1. Two-tailed tests are used in all cases. We use
each of the three metrics above to run this comparison.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2.
- We also include the series of individual and village level
demographic controls presented in G2.
- We also include a control for the potential presence of a sarpanch
relative during the interview, both separately and in interaction with
the gender of the sarpanch.
- Deviation 1: We originally planed to use the
Earth Mover’s Distance (Lupu et al 2017) as our primary outcome. After
discussion with the developers of the measure, we decided not to use
this measure for two reasons: 1) it does not provide additional
information relative to simpler measures, and 2) the package to
implement the measure is also not operational.
- Deviation 2: We are unable to implement metric 2
as planned because we did not ask respondents what their top priority
was post-budget discussion. We thus cannot identify top priorities among
the respondents who did not have one budget category with the highest
amount of allocation.
- Deviation 3: We are unable to implement metric 3
as planned because we did not ask respondents what their top priority
was post-budget discussion. We thus cannot identify top priorities among
the respondents who did not have one budget category with the highest
amount of allocation.
- Deviation 4: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP2a (H3.13a) table, Sarpanch post- and collective group preferences, average difference; Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
10.650*** |
12.051*** |
10.636*** |
10.650*** |
11.660*** |
9.492** |
10.650*** |
12.287*** |
11.179*** |
|
(1.155) |
(1.856) |
(2.518) |
(1.155) |
(2.073) |
(2.950) |
(1.155) |
(2.201) |
(3.060) |
| Discussion rules |
1.708 |
2.097 |
2.090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.340) |
(1.369) |
(1.400) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
2.360+ |
2.663 |
1.774 |
2.360+ |
-0.186 |
-0.548 |
2.360+ |
4.545 |
3.091 |
|
(1.402) |
(2.801) |
(2.966) |
(1.402) |
(2.778) |
(2.857) |
(1.402) |
(3.713) |
(4.182) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
-2.758 |
-3.379+ |
-3.443+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.685) |
(1.741) |
(1.784) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-3.343 |
-3.110 |
|
-7.618*** |
-7.005** |
|
-3.158 |
-3.029 |
|
|
(3.081) |
(3.049) |
|
(1.885) |
(2.650) |
|
(3.863) |
(3.683) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.426 |
0.538 |
|
0.663 |
1.082 |
|
-1.779 |
-1.586 |
|
|
(1.730) |
(1.852) |
|
(1.946) |
(2.126) |
|
(2.372) |
(2.518) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.131 |
0.274 |
|
-0.647 |
-0.050 |
|
0.322 |
0.861 |
|
|
(1.101) |
(1.178) |
|
(1.379) |
(1.446) |
|
(1.319) |
(1.419) |
| Education above median |
|
-1.471+ |
-1.690+ |
|
-1.223 |
-1.852+ |
|
-0.727 |
-0.886 |
|
|
(0.855) |
(0.898) |
|
(1.067) |
(1.095) |
|
(1.070) |
(1.133) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.220 |
-0.310 |
|
0.417 |
-0.191 |
|
-0.051 |
-0.547 |
|
|
(0.836) |
(0.884) |
|
(1.006) |
(1.051) |
|
(1.049) |
(1.112) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-1.615 |
-0.897 |
|
1.064 |
1.329 |
|
-3.456 |
-2.870 |
|
|
(2.357) |
(2.497) |
|
(2.276) |
(2.266) |
|
(3.403) |
(3.813) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-2.172* |
-2.040* |
|
-2.155* |
-1.579 |
|
-2.910** |
-3.425** |
|
|
(0.882) |
(0.955) |
|
(1.094) |
(1.178) |
|
(1.065) |
(1.118) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.117 |
0.180 |
|
0.178 |
0.172 |
|
0.120 |
0.239 |
|
|
(0.297) |
(0.312) |
|
(0.351) |
(0.356) |
|
(0.375) |
(0.393) |
| Gender quota |
|
1.149 |
1.444 |
|
1.368 |
1.742 |
|
0.902 |
1.574 |
|
|
(1.142) |
(1.271) |
|
(1.345) |
(1.492) |
|
(1.383) |
(1.517) |
| SC quota |
|
0.654 |
1.116 |
|
0.326 |
0.359 |
|
3.180 |
3.877 |
|
|
(1.698) |
(1.817) |
|
(1.873) |
(2.056) |
|
(2.344) |
(2.487) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.127 |
-0.071 |
|
0.709 |
0.836 |
|
-0.584 |
-0.758 |
|
|
(1.137) |
(1.220) |
|
(1.415) |
(1.489) |
|
(1.351) |
(1.461) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.539 |
-1.406 |
|
4.615+ |
3.159 |
|
-2.075 |
-2.583 |
|
|
(3.469) |
(3.498) |
|
(2.619) |
(3.280) |
|
(4.396) |
(4.270) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.016 |
|
|
0.022 |
|
|
0.023 |
|
|
|
(0.020) |
|
|
(0.025) |
|
|
(0.025) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.017 |
|
|
0.049 |
|
|
-0.006 |
|
|
|
(0.035) |
|
|
(0.042) |
|
|
(0.045) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.530 |
|
|
-1.002 |
|
|
-0.569 |
|
|
|
(0.882) |
|
|
(1.058) |
|
|
(1.098) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.862 |
1.177 |
1.281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.509) |
(1.549) |
(1.583) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
-2.434 |
-2.952 |
-3.253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.883) |
(1.982) |
(2.030) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.554+ |
2.809+ |
2.800+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.495) |
(1.578) |
(1.646) |
| T2:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2.991 |
-3.744+ |
-3.801+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.986) |
(2.033) |
(2.122) |
| Num.Obs. |
595 |
540 |
498 |
400 |
364 |
334 |
382 |
344 |
319 |
| R2 |
0.005 |
0.038 |
0.046 |
0.009 |
0.048 |
0.061 |
0.009 |
0.061 |
0.078 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP2a (H3.13a) table, Sarpanch post- and collective group preferences, average difference; Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
11.871*** |
13.732*** |
12.557*** |
11.871*** |
12.871*** |
10.996*** |
11.871*** |
13.592*** |
12.831*** |
|
(0.790) |
(1.678) |
(2.372) |
(0.790) |
(1.941) |
(2.899) |
(0.790) |
(2.075) |
(2.865) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.062 |
-0.091 |
-0.131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.988) |
(1.016) |
(1.059) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch SC |
0.905 |
0.223 |
0.334 |
0.905 |
0.739 |
1.267 |
0.905 |
-1.827 |
-1.709 |
|
(1.444) |
(2.146) |
(2.232) |
(1.444) |
(2.343) |
(2.507) |
(1.444) |
(2.506) |
(2.619) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch SC |
0.099 |
0.430 |
0.365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.737) |
(1.857) |
(1.914) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
0.261 |
-0.613 |
|
-1.922 |
-2.408 |
|
2.682 |
1.375 |
|
|
(2.533) |
(2.759) |
|
(2.560) |
(2.683) |
|
(3.523) |
(4.085) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-3.583 |
-3.442 |
|
-8.062*** |
-7.606* |
|
-3.254 |
-3.224 |
|
|
(3.463) |
(3.449) |
|
(2.337) |
(3.113) |
|
(4.417) |
(4.232) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.141 |
0.254 |
|
-0.657 |
-0.075 |
|
0.302 |
0.811 |
|
|
(1.108) |
(1.188) |
|
(1.381) |
(1.452) |
|
(1.343) |
(1.448) |
| Education above median |
|
-1.468+ |
-1.686+ |
|
-1.259 |
-1.876+ |
|
-0.663 |
-0.818 |
|
|
(0.860) |
(0.903) |
|
(1.073) |
(1.101) |
|
(1.080) |
(1.140) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.312 |
-0.241 |
|
0.526 |
-0.107 |
|
0.044 |
-0.477 |
|
|
(0.840) |
(0.887) |
|
(1.010) |
(1.054) |
|
(1.056) |
(1.119) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-1.651 |
-0.947 |
|
1.036 |
1.289 |
|
-3.497 |
-2.993 |
|
|
(2.363) |
(2.505) |
|
(2.341) |
(2.350) |
|
(3.346) |
(3.766) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-2.215* |
-2.059* |
|
-2.221* |
-1.630 |
|
-2.935** |
-3.428** |
|
|
(0.883) |
(0.955) |
|
(1.095) |
(1.180) |
|
(1.068) |
(1.121) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.102 |
0.173 |
|
0.151 |
0.162 |
|
0.121 |
0.237 |
|
|
(0.297) |
(0.313) |
|
(0.353) |
(0.359) |
|
(0.376) |
(0.394) |
| Gender quota |
|
1.203 |
1.434 |
|
1.494 |
1.824 |
|
0.810 |
1.353 |
|
|
(1.145) |
(1.273) |
|
(1.352) |
(1.494) |
|
(1.389) |
(1.539) |
| SC quota |
|
0.474 |
0.980 |
|
0.090 |
0.160 |
|
2.959 |
3.652 |
|
|
(1.743) |
(1.863) |
|
(1.926) |
(2.122) |
|
(2.482) |
(2.638) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.212 |
-0.124 |
|
0.611 |
0.729 |
|
-0.668 |
-0.774 |
|
|
(1.140) |
(1.232) |
|
(1.407) |
(1.492) |
|
(1.376) |
(1.499) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.281 |
-1.057 |
|
5.033+ |
3.756 |
|
-1.894 |
-2.353 |
|
|
(3.816) |
(3.855) |
|
(2.957) |
(3.664) |
|
(4.909) |
(4.767) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.014 |
|
|
0.020 |
|
|
0.020 |
|
|
|
(0.020) |
|
|
(0.025) |
|
|
(0.025) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.013 |
|
|
0.043 |
|
|
-0.011 |
|
|
|
(0.036) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.046) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.500 |
|
|
-1.004 |
|
|
-0.495 |
|
|
|
(0.889) |
|
|
(1.065) |
|
|
(1.118) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-0.819 |
-0.601 |
-0.567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.127) |
(1.167) |
(1.218) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
0.519 |
0.039 |
-0.296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.875) |
(2.049) |
(2.134) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.838 |
0.467 |
0.364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.180) |
(1.221) |
(1.295) |
| T2:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.487 |
0.439 |
0.550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.084) |
(2.238) |
(2.330) |
| Num.Obs. |
593 |
540 |
498 |
399 |
364 |
334 |
381 |
344 |
319 |
| R2 |
0.002 |
0.032 |
0.040 |
0.005 |
0.041 |
0.054 |
0.003 |
0.052 |
0.068 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP2b (H3.13b) table, Sarpanch post- and collective group preferences, average difference; Gram sevak female
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
12.631*** |
14.254*** |
13.154*** |
12.631*** |
13.619*** |
11.717*** |
12.631*** |
14.031*** |
13.294*** |
|
(0.869) |
(1.775) |
(2.421) |
(0.869) |
(2.049) |
(2.948) |
(0.869) |
(2.169) |
(2.931) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.511 |
-0.911 |
-1.077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.065) |
(1.110) |
(1.154) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gramsevak_female |
-1.245 |
-1.544 |
-1.951 |
-1.245 |
-1.732 |
-2.208 |
-1.245 |
-1.544 |
-1.986 |
|
(1.331) |
(1.389) |
(1.431) |
(1.331) |
(1.393) |
(1.450) |
(1.331) |
(1.385) |
(1.439) |
| Discussion rules:gramsevak_female |
1.284 |
2.331 |
2.623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.634) |
(1.711) |
(1.788) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
0.239 |
-0.605 |
|
-2.020 |
-2.339 |
|
2.991 |
1.774 |
|
|
(2.574) |
(2.800) |
|
(2.685) |
(2.796) |
|
(3.543) |
(4.110) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-3.940 |
-3.829 |
|
-8.419** |
-8.024* |
|
-3.836 |
-3.919 |
|
|
(3.514) |
(3.533) |
|
(2.596) |
(3.402) |
|
(4.478) |
(4.298) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.493 |
0.582 |
|
0.689 |
1.115 |
|
-1.577 |
-1.379 |
|
|
(1.764) |
(1.885) |
|
(2.005) |
(2.186) |
|
(2.452) |
(2.602) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.202 |
0.216 |
|
-0.719 |
-0.070 |
|
0.268 |
0.810 |
|
|
(1.115) |
(1.198) |
|
(1.399) |
(1.479) |
|
(1.341) |
(1.445) |
| Education above median |
|
-1.491+ |
-1.704+ |
|
-1.284 |
-1.903+ |
|
-0.693 |
-0.842 |
|
|
(0.861) |
(0.905) |
|
(1.072) |
(1.103) |
|
(1.083) |
(1.141) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.326 |
-0.261 |
|
0.558 |
-0.113 |
|
0.047 |
-0.541 |
|
|
(0.840) |
(0.888) |
|
(1.009) |
(1.056) |
|
(1.057) |
(1.123) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-1.600 |
-0.889 |
|
1.153 |
1.316 |
|
-3.590 |
-3.116 |
|
|
(2.401) |
(2.551) |
|
(2.467) |
(2.473) |
|
(3.367) |
(3.793) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-2.286* |
-2.169* |
|
-2.353* |
-1.809 |
|
-3.007** |
-3.568** |
|
|
(0.886) |
(0.961) |
|
(1.106) |
(1.199) |
|
(1.070) |
(1.121) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.123 |
0.195 |
|
0.170 |
0.187 |
|
0.167 |
0.289 |
|
|
(0.298) |
(0.314) |
|
(0.353) |
(0.361) |
|
(0.377) |
(0.397) |
| Gender quota |
|
1.163 |
1.313 |
|
1.441 |
1.624 |
|
0.583 |
0.989 |
|
|
(1.145) |
(1.274) |
|
(1.341) |
(1.488) |
|
(1.394) |
(1.548) |
| SC quota |
|
0.493 |
0.981 |
|
0.037 |
0.048 |
|
2.985 |
3.696 |
|
|
(1.738) |
(1.862) |
|
(1.928) |
(2.117) |
|
(2.418) |
(2.576) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.190 |
-0.101 |
|
0.625 |
0.729 |
|
-0.660 |
-0.776 |
|
|
(1.144) |
(1.238) |
|
(1.416) |
(1.507) |
|
(1.373) |
(1.495) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.129 |
-0.573 |
|
5.373+ |
4.199 |
|
-1.213 |
-1.452 |
|
|
(3.854) |
(3.930) |
|
(3.143) |
(3.897) |
|
(4.968) |
(4.842) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.016 |
|
|
0.024 |
|
|
0.023 |
|
|
|
(0.020) |
|
|
(0.025) |
|
|
(0.025) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.012 |
|
|
0.046 |
|
|
-0.012 |
|
|
|
(0.035) |
|
|
(0.043) |
|
|
(0.045) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.472 |
|
|
-0.957 |
|
|
-0.462 |
|
|
|
(0.890) |
|
|
(1.069) |
|
|
(1.112) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-1.200 |
-1.562 |
-1.656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.206) |
(1.282) |
(1.329) |
|
|
|
| T1:gramsevak_female |
|
|
|
1.335 |
2.425 |
2.519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.818) |
(1.941) |
(2.040) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.275 |
-0.476 |
-0.777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.255) |
(1.322) |
(1.413) |
| T2:gramsevak_female |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.159 |
2.632 |
3.181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.963) |
(2.080) |
(2.197) |
| Num.Obs. |
595 |
540 |
498 |
400 |
364 |
334 |
382 |
344 |
319 |
| R2 |
0.001 |
0.035 |
0.044 |
0.004 |
0.046 |
0.060 |
0.003 |
0.057 |
0.075 |
CP3 (H3.14): The distance between (pre-treatment) private
preferences of sarpanch and outcome of group decision making should be
lower for treated (T1, T2) groups than for those not treated
(Control).
- CP3 is assessed using differences in the mean distance between the
private (pre-treatment) preferences of the sarpanch versus the group
decision, comparing the mean “preference difference” across treatment
status (T1 or T2 versus Control). We use each of the three metrics above
to run this comparison.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2.
- We also include the series of individual and village level
demographic controls presented in G2.
- We also include a control for the potential presence of a sarpanch
relative during the interview, both separately and in interaction with
the gender of the sarpanch.
- Deviation 1: We originally planed to use the
Earth Mover’s Distance (Lupu et al 2017) as our primary outcome. After
discussion with the developers of the measure, we decided not to use
this measure for two reasons: 1) it does not provide additional
information relative to simpler measures, and 2) the package to
implement the measure is also not operational.
- Deviation 2: We only collected group top
priorities for 4/5 districts, hence the smaller sample size for the
binary measure.
- Deviation 3: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP3 (H3.14) table, Sarpanch pre- and collective group preferences, average difference
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
22.513*** |
21.502*** |
26.707*** |
22.513*** |
22.069*** |
28.601*** |
22.513*** |
21.564*** |
25.437*** |
|
(0.846) |
(2.131) |
(2.979) |
(0.846) |
(2.391) |
(3.309) |
(0.846) |
(2.642) |
(3.879) |
| Discussion rules |
-2.200* |
-2.353* |
-2.722* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.052) |
(1.123) |
(1.157) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
7.699* |
5.423 |
|
6.493+ |
4.367 |
|
7.858+ |
5.941 |
|
|
(3.238) |
(3.321) |
|
(3.360) |
(3.362) |
|
(4.383) |
(4.653) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.007 |
-0.247 |
|
-0.042 |
-3.308 |
|
3.117 |
1.979 |
|
|
(6.250) |
(6.581) |
|
(10.013) |
(10.754) |
|
(7.245) |
(7.392) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
2.254 |
1.714 |
|
-1.114 |
-1.064 |
|
4.790 |
4.128 |
|
|
(2.415) |
(2.485) |
|
(2.974) |
(3.071) |
|
(3.261) |
(3.186) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.628 |
-0.561 |
|
-4.049* |
-2.987 |
|
1.499 |
1.164 |
|
|
(1.528) |
(1.606) |
|
(1.753) |
(1.827) |
|
(1.891) |
(2.053) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.652 |
-1.555 |
|
-2.702* |
-3.624** |
|
1.210 |
0.598 |
|
|
(1.116) |
(1.141) |
|
(1.333) |
(1.352) |
|
(1.377) |
(1.422) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.984 |
-1.456 |
|
1.201 |
0.553 |
|
-2.460+ |
-2.925* |
|
|
(1.079) |
(1.122) |
|
(1.286) |
(1.338) |
|
(1.307) |
(1.377) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-4.010 |
-2.966 |
|
-2.156 |
-2.246 |
|
-4.506 |
-2.453 |
|
|
(2.929) |
(2.878) |
|
(2.971) |
(2.757) |
|
(3.999) |
(4.123) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.332 |
1.276 |
|
1.767 |
2.238 |
|
-0.936 |
0.105 |
|
|
(1.213) |
(1.272) |
|
(1.434) |
(1.503) |
|
(1.479) |
(1.571) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.030 |
-0.169 |
|
-0.363 |
-0.388 |
|
-0.128 |
-0.422 |
|
|
(0.369) |
(0.393) |
|
(0.452) |
(0.474) |
|
(0.450) |
(0.491) |
| Gender quota |
|
-1.170 |
0.458 |
|
-1.039 |
1.042 |
|
-0.145 |
0.409 |
|
|
(1.686) |
(1.899) |
|
(1.932) |
(2.115) |
|
(2.049) |
(2.383) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.530 |
-1.104 |
|
1.481 |
0.929 |
|
-2.438 |
-2.964 |
|
|
(2.405) |
(2.473) |
|
(2.946) |
(3.052) |
|
(3.266) |
(3.204) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.385 |
-0.079 |
|
1.567 |
1.394 |
|
-1.831 |
-1.348 |
|
|
(1.526) |
(1.588) |
|
(1.754) |
(1.803) |
|
(1.894) |
(2.027) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-4.738 |
-4.280 |
|
-0.661 |
1.308 |
|
-6.754 |
-5.482 |
|
|
(6.612) |
(6.964) |
|
(10.293) |
(11.012) |
|
(7.820) |
(7.974) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.081** |
|
|
-0.103*** |
|
|
-0.072* |
|
|
|
(0.027) |
|
|
(0.030) |
|
|
(0.035) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.058 |
|
|
0.072 |
|
|
0.072 |
|
|
|
(0.045) |
|
|
(0.054) |
|
|
(0.064) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.019 |
|
|
-0.701 |
|
|
0.751 |
|
|
|
(1.203) |
|
|
(1.437) |
|
|
(1.495) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-3.287** |
-3.092* |
-3.696** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.204) |
(1.268) |
(1.327) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1.041 |
-1.042 |
-1.398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.240) |
(1.339) |
(1.391) |
| Num.Obs. |
583 |
528 |
487 |
389 |
353 |
324 |
376 |
338 |
314 |
| R2 |
0.007 |
0.043 |
0.066 |
0.019 |
0.082 |
0.120 |
0.002 |
0.061 |
0.078 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP3 (H3.14) table, Sarpanch pre- priority and collective group preference percentage difference
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
48.190*** |
41.858*** |
60.679*** |
48.190*** |
45.627*** |
65.552*** |
48.190*** |
38.257*** |
54.233*** |
|
(2.344) |
(5.948) |
(8.518) |
(2.344) |
(6.778) |
(9.652) |
(2.344) |
(7.335) |
(10.808) |
| Discussion rules |
-2.924 |
-3.871 |
-5.683+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.906) |
(3.067) |
(3.132) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
24.554** |
18.437+ |
|
22.601* |
17.431 |
|
26.155* |
20.082 |
|
|
(9.293) |
(9.588) |
|
(10.659) |
(10.726) |
|
(12.181) |
(12.618) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
2.664 |
-2.129 |
|
-4.990 |
-14.939 |
|
1.303 |
-3.094 |
|
|
(14.835) |
(16.907) |
|
(21.548) |
(24.704) |
|
(17.683) |
(19.278) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.952 |
-0.484 |
|
-11.077 |
-11.207 |
|
12.719 |
11.056 |
|
|
(6.287) |
(6.421) |
|
(7.443) |
(7.590) |
|
(8.510) |
(8.287) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-1.361 |
-1.061 |
|
-11.910* |
-9.480+ |
|
8.271 |
7.758 |
|
|
(4.096) |
(4.351) |
|
(4.801) |
(5.013) |
|
(5.080) |
(5.561) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.500 |
-3.005 |
|
-3.430 |
-6.278+ |
|
4.085 |
2.945 |
|
|
(3.032) |
(3.092) |
|
(3.670) |
(3.725) |
|
(3.684) |
(3.734) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-2.271 |
-3.777 |
|
2.849 |
1.185 |
|
-6.390+ |
-8.703* |
|
|
(3.010) |
(3.122) |
|
(3.596) |
(3.737) |
|
(3.609) |
(3.719) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-8.753 |
-6.097 |
|
-4.960 |
-5.641 |
|
-10.370 |
-4.156 |
|
|
(8.525) |
(8.295) |
|
(9.755) |
(9.142) |
|
(11.180) |
(11.029) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
1.393 |
3.359 |
|
2.615 |
3.590 |
|
0.240 |
2.185 |
|
|
(3.307) |
(3.495) |
|
(3.954) |
(4.165) |
|
(4.086) |
(4.353) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.500 |
0.182 |
|
-0.530 |
-0.368 |
|
0.210 |
-0.435 |
|
|
(0.996) |
(1.060) |
|
(1.225) |
(1.294) |
|
(1.197) |
(1.306) |
| Gender quota |
|
-8.906+ |
-5.056 |
|
-9.888+ |
-5.233 |
|
-6.969 |
-5.300 |
|
|
(4.754) |
(5.418) |
|
(5.466) |
(6.117) |
|
(5.846) |
(6.685) |
| SC quota |
|
5.818 |
4.347 |
|
12.231+ |
11.441 |
|
-0.035 |
-2.575 |
|
|
(6.178) |
(6.295) |
|
(7.315) |
(7.487) |
|
(8.446) |
(8.217) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.524 |
0.832 |
|
5.837 |
5.186 |
|
-4.542 |
-4.585 |
|
|
(4.068) |
(4.318) |
|
(4.630) |
(4.825) |
|
(5.060) |
(5.488) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-11.141 |
-8.376 |
|
4.877 |
12.399 |
|
-6.845 |
-2.023 |
|
|
(16.056) |
(18.038) |
|
(22.644) |
(25.641) |
|
(19.749) |
(21.064) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.297*** |
|
|
-0.311*** |
|
|
-0.293** |
|
|
|
(0.072) |
|
|
(0.086) |
|
|
(0.089) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.181 |
|
|
0.167 |
|
|
0.266 |
|
|
|
(0.127) |
|
|
(0.154) |
|
|
(0.174) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.784 |
|
|
-0.099 |
|
|
3.353 |
|
|
|
(3.295) |
|
|
(3.939) |
|
|
(4.102) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-5.460 |
-5.792+ |
-8.128* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.345) |
(3.500) |
(3.638) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.246 |
-0.874 |
-2.485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.403) |
(3.626) |
(3.709) |
| Num.Obs. |
594 |
538 |
498 |
397 |
360 |
332 |
386 |
347 |
323 |
| R2 |
0.002 |
0.042 |
0.073 |
0.007 |
0.071 |
0.103 |
0.000 |
0.067 |
0.105 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP3 (H3.14) table, Sarpanch pre- priority and collective priority same
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.369*** |
0.383*** |
0.258+ |
0.369*** |
0.410*** |
0.141 |
0.369*** |
0.354** |
0.261 |
|
(0.039) |
(0.096) |
(0.133) |
(0.039) |
(0.109) |
(0.158) |
(0.039) |
(0.122) |
(0.179) |
| Discussion rules |
0.135** |
0.152** |
0.158** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.047) |
(0.050) |
(0.051) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
0.191 |
0.195 |
|
0.186 |
0.213 |
|
0.227 |
0.213 |
|
|
(0.165) |
(0.167) |
|
(0.189) |
(0.182) |
|
(0.224) |
(0.231) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.206 |
-0.200 |
|
-0.346*** |
-0.242 |
|
-0.221 |
-0.225 |
|
|
(0.227) |
(0.224) |
|
(0.085) |
(0.195) |
|
(0.244) |
(0.231) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.071 |
-0.053 |
|
-0.191 |
-0.166 |
|
0.006 |
0.031 |
|
|
(0.106) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.121) |
(0.121) |
|
(0.157) |
(0.157) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.087 |
0.099 |
|
0.099 |
0.093 |
|
0.081 |
0.091 |
|
|
(0.067) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.080) |
(0.081) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.093) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.001 |
0.016 |
|
0.075 |
0.091 |
|
-0.045 |
-0.032 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.063) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.082+ |
0.068 |
|
0.062 |
0.063 |
|
0.118* |
0.101 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.062) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.245+ |
-0.242+ |
|
-0.184 |
-0.185 |
|
-0.177 |
-0.178 |
|
|
(0.140) |
(0.139) |
|
(0.167) |
(0.156) |
|
(0.183) |
(0.185) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.032 |
-0.047 |
|
-0.056 |
-0.069 |
|
-0.037 |
-0.048 |
|
|
(0.058) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.077) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.019 |
-0.020 |
|
-0.025 |
-0.030 |
|
-0.010 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.023) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.061 |
-0.069 |
|
-0.123 |
-0.143 |
|
-0.182 |
-0.167 |
|
|
(0.097) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.107) |
(0.110) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.138) |
| SC quota |
|
0.136 |
0.134 |
|
0.209+ |
0.202+ |
|
0.111 |
0.112 |
|
|
(0.102) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.115) |
(0.114) |
|
(0.153) |
(0.155) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.048 |
-0.054 |
|
-0.109 |
-0.099 |
|
-0.030 |
-0.042 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.086) |
(0.091) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.340 |
0.367 |
|
0.521** |
0.483* |
|
0.274 |
0.301 |
|
|
(0.254) |
(0.251) |
|
(0.158) |
(0.234) |
|
(0.289) |
(0.275) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.003* |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.003) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.057 |
|
|
0.060 |
|
|
0.061 |
|
|
|
(0.053) |
|
|
(0.063) |
|
|
(0.065) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.146** |
0.157** |
0.165** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.058) |
(0.059) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.125* |
0.147* |
0.158** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.055) |
(0.060) |
(0.061) |
| Num.Obs. |
490 |
447 |
433 |
324 |
295 |
287 |
323 |
294 |
284 |
| R2 |
0.016 |
0.056 |
0.065 |
0.021 |
0.092 |
0.116 |
0.016 |
0.066 |
0.074 |
CP4 (H3.15): [Heterogeneous treatment effects] the effect of the
treatment, as implied by CP3, should be larger if the sarpanch belongs
to a disadvantaged category (CP4a) or if the gram sevak is female
(CP4b).
- CP4 is assessed using a regression interacting leader and/or gram
sevak characteristics with treatment status for each relevant dependent
variable. Our focus is on the interaction term; we cluster on
administrative block level. We use the same three measures of preference
distance outlined in CP3. Two-tailed tests are used in all cases. We use
each of the three metrics above to run this comparison.
- In additional analyses, we disentangle between T1 and T2.
- We also include the series of individual and village level
demographic controls presented in G2.
- We also include a control for the potential presence of a sarpanch
relative during the interview, both separately and in interaction with
the gender of the sarpanch.
- Deviation 1: We originally planed to use the
Earth Mover’s Distance (Lupu et al 2017) as our primary outcome. After
discussion with the developers of the measure, we decided not to use
this measure for two reasons: 1) it does not provide additional
information relative to simpler measures, and 2) the package to
implement the measure is also not operational.
- Deviation 2: We only collected group top
priorities for 4/5 districts, hence the smaller sample size for the
binary measure.
- Deviation 3: We originally planned to use
clustered standard errors at the taluka level. This was an error on our
part: because the treatment assignment occurs at the level of each
village council, we do not cluster standard errors in these analyses.
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP4a (H3.15a) table, Sarpanch pre- and collective group preferences, average difference; Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
20.176*** |
19.639*** |
24.346*** |
20.176*** |
20.364*** |
26.144*** |
20.176*** |
20.466*** |
23.990*** |
|
(1.505) |
(2.469) |
(3.275) |
(1.505) |
(2.702) |
(3.563) |
(1.505) |
(2.879) |
(4.123) |
| Discussion rules |
-0.602 |
0.081 |
0.038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.768) |
(1.864) |
(1.830) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
3.667* |
10.548** |
8.576* |
3.667* |
8.988* |
7.359+ |
3.667* |
9.593* |
7.682 |
|
(1.806) |
(3.585) |
(3.632) |
(1.806) |
(3.738) |
(3.756) |
(1.806) |
(4.545) |
(4.748) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
-2.326 |
-3.978+ |
-4.519+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.199) |
(2.321) |
(2.334) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.328 |
0.202 |
|
0.616 |
-2.410 |
|
3.218 |
2.163 |
|
|
(6.315) |
(6.546) |
|
(10.216) |
(10.757) |
|
(7.312) |
(7.357) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
2.105 |
1.606 |
|
-1.324 |
-1.166 |
|
4.644 |
3.996 |
|
|
(2.385) |
(2.448) |
|
(2.905) |
(2.993) |
|
(3.228) |
(3.150) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.628 |
-0.548 |
|
-4.060* |
-2.970 |
|
1.505 |
1.196 |
|
|
(1.525) |
(1.598) |
|
(1.751) |
(1.821) |
|
(1.892) |
(2.044) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.669 |
-1.567 |
|
-2.652* |
-3.573** |
|
1.123 |
0.508 |
|
|
(1.116) |
(1.141) |
|
(1.333) |
(1.351) |
|
(1.388) |
(1.433) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-1.098 |
-1.543 |
|
1.032 |
0.402 |
|
-2.547+ |
-2.979* |
|
|
(1.078) |
(1.120) |
|
(1.294) |
(1.347) |
|
(1.298) |
(1.367) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-3.961 |
-2.888 |
|
-2.094 |
-2.155 |
|
-4.469 |
-2.318 |
|
|
(2.929) |
(2.888) |
|
(2.943) |
(2.783) |
|
(4.014) |
(4.128) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.397 |
1.322 |
|
1.886 |
2.349 |
|
-0.907 |
0.116 |
|
|
(1.210) |
(1.270) |
|
(1.435) |
(1.499) |
|
(1.470) |
(1.565) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.038 |
-0.167 |
|
-0.331 |
-0.376 |
|
-0.137 |
-0.428 |
|
|
(0.370) |
(0.393) |
|
(0.455) |
(0.476) |
|
(0.451) |
(0.491) |
| Gender quota |
|
-1.249 |
0.445 |
|
-1.246 |
0.867 |
|
-0.097 |
0.568 |
|
|
(1.692) |
(1.904) |
|
(1.950) |
(2.129) |
|
(2.055) |
(2.399) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.291 |
-0.894 |
|
1.880 |
1.285 |
|
-2.269 |
-2.800 |
|
|
(2.376) |
(2.438) |
|
(2.876) |
(2.965) |
|
(3.236) |
(3.177) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.285 |
0.001 |
|
1.694 |
1.547 |
|
-1.748 |
-1.314 |
|
|
(1.521) |
(1.577) |
|
(1.741) |
(1.777) |
|
(1.894) |
(2.019) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-5.105 |
-4.785 |
|
-1.259 |
0.473 |
|
-6.982 |
-5.783 |
|
|
(6.653) |
(6.906) |
|
(10.477) |
(10.993) |
|
(7.851) |
(7.907) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.079** |
|
|
-0.101** |
|
|
-0.070* |
|
|
|
(0.027) |
|
|
(0.030) |
|
|
(0.035) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.064 |
|
|
0.084 |
|
|
0.076 |
|
|
|
(0.045) |
|
|
(0.054) |
|
|
(0.064) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
-0.689 |
|
|
0.712 |
|
|
|
(1.202) |
|
|
(1.432) |
|
|
(1.495) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-1.942 |
-0.578 |
-0.646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.954) |
(2.016) |
(1.983) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
-1.911 |
-4.222 |
-5.207* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.488) |
(2.621) |
(2.639) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.738 |
0.965 |
0.826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.033) |
(2.170) |
(2.170) |
| T2:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2.625 |
-3.381 |
-3.726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.568) |
(2.694) |
(2.761) |
| Num.Obs. |
583 |
528 |
487 |
389 |
353 |
324 |
376 |
338 |
314 |
| R2 |
0.016 |
0.048 |
0.073 |
0.032 |
0.089 |
0.130 |
0.013 |
0.066 |
0.084 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP4a (H3.15a) table, Sarpanch pre- priority and collective group preference percentage difference; Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
41.750*** |
37.301*** |
54.675*** |
41.750*** |
41.763*** |
59.340*** |
41.750*** |
35.356*** |
50.527*** |
|
(4.147) |
(6.744) |
(9.188) |
(4.147) |
(7.500) |
(10.241) |
(4.147) |
(7.802) |
(11.174) |
| Discussion rules |
0.712 |
2.043 |
1.217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.850) |
(5.096) |
(5.046) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
10.060* |
31.470** |
26.290* |
10.060* |
28.157* |
24.791* |
10.060* |
30.749* |
24.416+ |
|
(4.994) |
(10.246) |
(10.398) |
(4.994) |
(11.596) |
(11.601) |
(4.994) |
(12.641) |
(12.898) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
-4.920 |
-9.710 |
-11.333+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.063) |
(6.385) |
(6.411) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
3.430 |
-1.026 |
|
-3.558 |
-12.747 |
|
1.569 |
-2.640 |
|
|
(14.384) |
(16.092) |
|
(21.337) |
(23.838) |
|
(17.252) |
(18.488) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.630 |
-0.682 |
|
-11.484 |
-11.345 |
|
12.362 |
10.787 |
|
|
(6.245) |
(6.365) |
|
(7.362) |
(7.494) |
|
(8.444) |
(8.229) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-1.298 |
-0.936 |
|
-11.854* |
-9.303+ |
|
8.333 |
7.909 |
|
|
(4.103) |
(4.346) |
|
(4.815) |
(5.018) |
|
(5.100) |
(5.554) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.490 |
-2.976 |
|
-3.277 |
-6.113 |
|
3.936 |
2.813 |
|
|
(3.033) |
(3.090) |
|
(3.674) |
(3.726) |
|
(3.706) |
(3.756) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-2.574 |
-4.032 |
|
2.473 |
0.797 |
|
-6.680+ |
-8.908* |
|
|
(3.018) |
(3.127) |
|
(3.624) |
(3.770) |
|
(3.604) |
(3.708) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-8.648 |
-5.911 |
|
-4.850 |
-5.450 |
|
-10.283 |
-3.831 |
|
|
(8.505) |
(8.282) |
|
(9.666) |
(9.124) |
|
(11.175) |
(10.974) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
1.517 |
3.439 |
|
2.853 |
3.851 |
|
0.256 |
2.144 |
|
|
(3.305) |
(3.494) |
|
(3.960) |
(4.162) |
|
(4.077) |
(4.353) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.518 |
0.180 |
|
-0.458 |
-0.344 |
|
0.185 |
-0.456 |
|
|
(0.998) |
(1.061) |
|
(1.236) |
(1.300) |
|
(1.198) |
(1.307) |
| Gender quota |
|
-9.109+ |
-5.096 |
|
-10.347+ |
-5.638 |
|
-6.886 |
-4.958 |
|
|
(4.759) |
(5.418) |
|
(5.494) |
(6.132) |
|
(5.834) |
(6.680) |
| SC quota |
|
6.460 |
4.944 |
|
13.177+ |
12.390+ |
|
0.488 |
-2.071 |
|
|
(6.130) |
(6.238) |
|
(7.217) |
(7.366) |
|
(8.372) |
(8.170) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.780 |
1.051 |
|
6.150 |
5.613 |
|
-4.323 |
-4.496 |
|
|
(4.065) |
(4.304) |
|
(4.626) |
(4.797) |
|
(5.064) |
(5.472) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-11.942 |
-9.501 |
|
3.686 |
10.536 |
|
-7.396 |
-2.685 |
|
|
(15.570) |
(17.189) |
|
(22.386) |
(24.722) |
|
(19.261) |
(20.241) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.291*** |
|
|
-0.305*** |
|
|
-0.286** |
|
|
|
(0.072) |
|
|
(0.087) |
|
|
(0.089) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.196 |
|
|
0.195 |
|
|
0.275 |
|
|
|
(0.127) |
|
|
(0.153) |
|
|
(0.174) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.787 |
|
|
0.013 |
|
|
3.299 |
|
|
|
(3.290) |
|
|
(3.924) |
|
|
(4.106) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-2.904 |
-0.157 |
-0.553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.373) |
(5.588) |
(5.594) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
-3.154 |
-9.497 |
-12.958+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.888) |
(7.263) |
(7.366) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.250 |
4.391 |
3.006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.534) |
(5.849) |
(5.806) |
| T2:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6.377 |
-8.960 |
-9.283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.037) |
(7.368) |
(7.435) |
| Num.Obs. |
594 |
538 |
498 |
397 |
360 |
332 |
386 |
347 |
323 |
| R2 |
0.012 |
0.046 |
0.079 |
0.022 |
0.075 |
0.112 |
0.012 |
0.071 |
0.110 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP4a (H3.15a) table, Sarpanch pre- priority and collective priority same; Gender disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.370*** |
0.384*** |
0.262+ |
0.370*** |
0.419*** |
0.151 |
0.370*** |
0.351** |
0.260 |
|
(0.066) |
(0.107) |
(0.142) |
(0.066) |
(0.118) |
(0.166) |
(0.066) |
(0.126) |
(0.182) |
| Discussion rules |
0.151+ |
0.152+ |
0.153+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.077) |
(0.081) |
(0.080) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
-0.001 |
0.190 |
0.190 |
-0.001 |
0.173 |
0.201 |
-0.001 |
0.231 |
0.215 |
|
(0.082) |
(0.183) |
(0.184) |
(0.082) |
(0.202) |
(0.195) |
(0.082) |
(0.232) |
(0.239) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch woman |
-0.032 |
0.001 |
0.008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.098) |
(0.103) |
(0.103) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.206 |
-0.201 |
|
-0.354*** |
-0.249 |
|
-0.220 |
-0.225 |
|
|
(0.230) |
(0.228) |
|
(0.093) |
(0.197) |
|
(0.246) |
(0.232) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.071 |
-0.053 |
|
-0.190 |
-0.166 |
|
0.006 |
0.031 |
|
|
(0.107) |
(0.108) |
|
(0.121) |
(0.121) |
|
(0.158) |
(0.158) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.087 |
0.099 |
|
0.099 |
0.093 |
|
0.081 |
0.091 |
|
|
(0.068) |
(0.070) |
|
(0.080) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.094) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.001 |
0.016 |
|
0.075 |
0.091 |
|
-0.045 |
-0.032 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.063) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.082+ |
0.068 |
|
0.062 |
0.063 |
|
0.118* |
0.101 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.062) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.245+ |
-0.242+ |
|
-0.184 |
-0.184 |
|
-0.178 |
-0.178 |
|
|
(0.140) |
(0.139) |
|
(0.167) |
(0.156) |
|
(0.183) |
(0.186) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.032 |
-0.047 |
|
-0.056 |
-0.070 |
|
-0.037 |
-0.048 |
|
|
(0.058) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.077) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.019 |
-0.020 |
|
-0.025 |
-0.030 |
|
-0.010 |
-0.013 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.024) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.061 |
-0.069 |
|
-0.123 |
-0.143 |
|
-0.181 |
-0.167 |
|
|
(0.097) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.107) |
(0.111) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.138) |
| SC quota |
|
0.136 |
0.134 |
|
0.207+ |
0.200+ |
|
0.111 |
0.112 |
|
|
(0.102) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.116) |
(0.114) |
|
(0.154) |
(0.156) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.048 |
-0.054 |
|
-0.109 |
-0.100 |
|
-0.030 |
-0.042 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.091) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.340 |
0.368 |
|
0.528** |
0.490* |
|
0.273 |
0.301 |
|
|
(0.257) |
(0.254) |
|
(0.162) |
(0.236) |
|
(0.291) |
(0.277) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.003* |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.003) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.057 |
|
|
0.060 |
|
|
0.061 |
|
|
|
(0.053) |
|
|
(0.064) |
|
|
(0.065) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.156+ |
0.144 |
0.153+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.088) |
(0.092) |
(0.089) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
-0.019 |
0.022 |
0.020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.113) |
(0.118) |
(0.118) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.147+ |
0.152+ |
0.160+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.085) |
(0.091) |
(0.090) |
| T2:Sarpanch woman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.047 |
-0.008 |
-0.003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.113) |
(0.120) |
(0.122) |
| Num.Obs. |
490 |
447 |
433 |
324 |
295 |
287 |
323 |
294 |
284 |
| R2 |
0.017 |
0.056 |
0.065 |
0.022 |
0.093 |
0.116 |
0.017 |
0.066 |
0.074 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP4a (H3.15a) table, Sarpanch pre- and collective group preferences, average difference; Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
22.008*** |
21.513*** |
26.620*** |
22.008*** |
21.954*** |
28.472*** |
22.008*** |
21.668*** |
25.385*** |
|
(1.022) |
(2.198) |
(3.041) |
(1.022) |
(2.452) |
(3.382) |
(1.022) |
(2.684) |
(3.907) |
| Discussion rules |
-2.318+ |
-2.369+ |
-2.614+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.293) |
(1.365) |
(1.414) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch SC |
1.613 |
2.214 |
1.974 |
1.613 |
-0.675 |
-0.687 |
1.613 |
4.469 |
4.243 |
|
(1.826) |
(2.878) |
(2.923) |
(1.826) |
(3.328) |
(3.408) |
(1.826) |
(3.461) |
(3.433) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch SC |
0.143 |
0.057 |
-0.376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.233) |
(2.395) |
(2.445) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
7.700* |
5.418 |
|
6.531+ |
4.386 |
|
7.905+ |
5.926 |
|
|
(3.242) |
(3.324) |
|
(3.356) |
(3.361) |
|
(4.408) |
(4.672) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
1.010 |
-0.266 |
|
-0.132 |
-3.363 |
|
3.144 |
1.972 |
|
|
(6.268) |
(6.584) |
|
(9.916) |
(10.679) |
|
(7.283) |
(7.414) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.628 |
-0.560 |
|
-4.051* |
-2.985 |
|
1.491 |
1.168 |
|
|
(1.528) |
(1.607) |
|
(1.756) |
(1.829) |
|
(1.893) |
(2.053) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.652 |
-1.555 |
|
-2.702* |
-3.622** |
|
1.211 |
0.598 |
|
|
(1.117) |
(1.142) |
|
(1.334) |
(1.354) |
|
(1.380) |
(1.424) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.983 |
-1.465 |
|
1.194 |
0.537 |
|
-2.449+ |
-2.933* |
|
|
(1.080) |
(1.125) |
|
(1.289) |
(1.344) |
|
(1.311) |
(1.385) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-4.010 |
-2.966 |
|
-2.155 |
-2.245 |
|
-4.519 |
-2.453 |
|
|
(2.933) |
(2.880) |
|
(2.960) |
(2.749) |
|
(4.013) |
(4.133) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.332 |
1.275 |
|
1.761 |
2.228 |
|
-0.942 |
0.108 |
|
|
(1.214) |
(1.274) |
|
(1.436) |
(1.508) |
|
(1.481) |
(1.573) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.029 |
-0.168 |
|
-0.358 |
-0.387 |
|
-0.133 |
-0.420 |
|
|
(0.370) |
(0.393) |
|
(0.454) |
(0.474) |
|
(0.453) |
(0.492) |
| Gender quota |
|
-1.170 |
0.462 |
|
-1.076 |
1.025 |
|
-0.180 |
0.423 |
|
|
(1.687) |
(1.903) |
|
(1.949) |
(2.130) |
|
(2.059) |
(2.397) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.530 |
-1.104 |
|
1.442 |
0.892 |
|
-2.480 |
-2.947 |
|
|
(2.407) |
(2.477) |
|
(2.956) |
(3.061) |
|
(3.269) |
(3.207) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.384 |
-0.090 |
|
1.550 |
1.373 |
|
-1.806 |
-1.358 |
|
|
(1.532) |
(1.596) |
|
(1.760) |
(1.810) |
|
(1.911) |
(2.047) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-4.744 |
-4.235 |
|
-0.547 |
1.397 |
|
-6.833 |
-5.449 |
|
|
(6.636) |
(6.981) |
|
(10.219) |
(10.955) |
|
(7.860) |
(8.023) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.081** |
|
|
-0.102*** |
|
|
-0.072* |
|
|
|
(0.027) |
|
|
(0.030) |
|
|
(0.034) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.058 |
|
|
0.072 |
|
|
0.072 |
|
|
|
(0.045) |
|
|
(0.054) |
|
|
(0.064) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.015 |
|
|
-0.703 |
|
|
0.745 |
|
|
|
(1.203) |
|
|
(1.439) |
|
|
(1.487) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-3.523* |
-2.885+ |
-3.512* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.479) |
(1.515) |
(1.590) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
0.574 |
-0.760 |
-0.656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.542) |
(2.792) |
(2.908) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.915 |
-1.242 |
-1.324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.553) |
(1.671) |
(1.745) |
| T2:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.563 |
0.666 |
-0.242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.609) |
(2.794) |
(2.850) |
| Num.Obs. |
581 |
528 |
487 |
388 |
353 |
324 |
375 |
338 |
314 |
| R2 |
0.012 |
0.043 |
0.066 |
0.025 |
0.082 |
0.120 |
0.005 |
0.061 |
0.078 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP4a (H3.15a) table, Sarpanch pre- priority and collective group preference percentage difference; Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
46.229*** |
41.213*** |
59.909*** |
46.229*** |
44.124*** |
63.868*** |
46.229*** |
38.594*** |
54.320*** |
|
(2.739) |
(6.090) |
(8.613) |
(2.739) |
(6.885) |
(9.722) |
(2.739) |
(7.436) |
(10.830) |
| Discussion rules |
-2.546 |
-2.941 |
-4.758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.471) |
(3.643) |
(3.766) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch SC |
6.392 |
3.274 |
1.752 |
6.392 |
-5.418 |
-6.428 |
6.392 |
11.687 |
10.872 |
|
(5.235) |
(7.751) |
(7.766) |
(5.235) |
(8.787) |
(8.938) |
(5.235) |
(9.162) |
(8.964) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch SC |
-1.956 |
-3.332 |
-3.235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.364) |
(6.749) |
(6.732) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
24.541** |
18.397+ |
|
23.148* |
17.700+ |
|
26.304* |
20.106 |
|
|
(9.261) |
(9.569) |
|
(10.285) |
(10.424) |
|
(12.267) |
(12.660) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
2.465 |
-2.270 |
|
-6.152 |
-15.638 |
|
1.375 |
-3.088 |
|
|
(14.789) |
(16.879) |
|
(20.130) |
(23.431) |
|
(17.755) |
(19.352) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-1.370 |
-1.059 |
|
-11.966* |
-9.485+ |
|
8.247 |
7.752 |
|
|
(4.097) |
(4.351) |
|
(4.817) |
(5.014) |
|
(5.090) |
(5.570) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.510 |
-3.007 |
|
-3.436 |
-6.247+ |
|
4.087 |
2.945 |
|
|
(3.032) |
(3.092) |
|
(3.656) |
(3.718) |
|
(3.691) |
(3.740) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-2.297 |
-3.840 |
|
2.772 |
1.019 |
|
-6.359+ |
-8.692* |
|
|
(3.015) |
(3.132) |
|
(3.606) |
(3.762) |
|
(3.623) |
(3.743) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-8.724 |
-6.095 |
|
-4.935 |
-5.612 |
|
-10.415 |
-4.156 |
|
|
(8.484) |
(8.258) |
|
(9.338) |
(8.773) |
|
(11.222) |
(11.046) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
1.379 |
3.340 |
|
2.492 |
3.435 |
|
0.233 |
2.183 |
|
|
(3.309) |
(3.502) |
|
(3.948) |
(4.176) |
|
(4.091) |
(4.357) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.523 |
0.200 |
|
-0.443 |
-0.328 |
|
0.191 |
-0.439 |
|
|
(0.997) |
(1.059) |
|
(1.223) |
(1.289) |
|
(1.203) |
(1.308) |
| Gender quota |
|
-8.907+ |
-5.007 |
|
-10.401+ |
-5.463 |
|
-7.085 |
-5.324 |
|
|
(4.773) |
(5.445) |
|
(5.531) |
(6.187) |
|
(5.874) |
(6.704) |
| SC quota |
|
5.809 |
4.344 |
|
11.696 |
10.949 |
|
-0.166 |
-2.603 |
|
|
(6.188) |
(6.307) |
|
(7.346) |
(7.544) |
|
(8.451) |
(8.223) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.450 |
0.745 |
|
5.635 |
4.947 |
|
-4.459 |
-4.569 |
|
|
(4.081) |
(4.336) |
|
(4.665) |
(4.848) |
|
(5.097) |
(5.533) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-10.810 |
-8.036 |
|
6.251 |
13.462 |
|
-7.074 |
-2.069 |
|
|
(16.089) |
(18.103) |
|
(21.445) |
(24.525) |
|
(19.880) |
(21.272) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.294*** |
|
|
-0.303*** |
|
|
-0.293** |
|
|
|
(0.072) |
|
|
(0.087) |
|
|
(0.088) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.183 |
|
|
0.169 |
|
|
0.266 |
|
|
|
(0.127) |
|
|
(0.153) |
|
|
(0.175) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.726 |
|
|
-0.222 |
|
|
3.366 |
|
|
|
(3.290) |
|
|
(3.933) |
|
|
(4.088) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-4.376 |
-3.124 |
-5.813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.009) |
(4.083) |
(4.274) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
-4.135 |
-9.863 |
-8.358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.295) |
(7.822) |
(8.036) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.453 |
-1.511 |
-2.602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.147) |
(4.418) |
(4.585) |
| T2:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.435 |
2.145 |
0.388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.336) |
(7.811) |
(7.734) |
| Num.Obs. |
592 |
538 |
498 |
396 |
360 |
332 |
385 |
347 |
323 |
| R2 |
0.007 |
0.042 |
0.074 |
0.011 |
0.075 |
0.106 |
0.008 |
0.067 |
0.105 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP4a (H3.15a) table, Sarpanch pre- priority and collective priority same; Caste disadvantage
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.352*** |
0.385*** |
0.257+ |
0.352*** |
0.402*** |
0.120 |
0.352*** |
0.367** |
0.283 |
|
(0.046) |
(0.098) |
(0.135) |
(0.046) |
(0.110) |
(0.159) |
(0.046) |
(0.122) |
(0.182) |
| Discussion rules |
0.146* |
0.150* |
0.159** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.057) |
(0.059) |
(0.060) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch SC |
0.056 |
-0.078 |
-0.050 |
0.056 |
-0.147 |
-0.092 |
0.056 |
-0.052 |
-0.032 |
|
(0.085) |
(0.130) |
(0.132) |
(0.085) |
(0.140) |
(0.142) |
(0.085) |
(0.165) |
(0.164) |
| Discussion rules:Sarpanch SC |
-0.040 |
0.009 |
-0.004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.103) |
(0.110) |
(0.112) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
0.191 |
0.195 |
|
0.182 |
0.205 |
|
0.241 |
0.233 |
|
|
(0.166) |
(0.168) |
|
(0.187) |
(0.178) |
|
(0.225) |
(0.233) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.206 |
-0.200 |
|
-0.353*** |
-0.250 |
|
-0.218 |
-0.224 |
|
|
(0.228) |
(0.225) |
|
(0.100) |
(0.227) |
|
(0.252) |
(0.239) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.087 |
0.099 |
|
0.099 |
0.093 |
|
0.081 |
0.090 |
|
|
(0.067) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.080) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.087) |
(0.093) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.001 |
0.016 |
|
0.075 |
0.091 |
|
-0.045 |
-0.032 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.062) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.063) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.082+ |
0.068 |
|
0.060 |
0.060 |
|
0.122* |
0.105+ |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.061) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.245+ |
-0.242+ |
|
-0.180 |
-0.177 |
|
-0.183 |
-0.184 |
|
|
(0.140) |
(0.139) |
|
(0.165) |
(0.152) |
|
(0.184) |
(0.187) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.032 |
-0.047 |
|
-0.058 |
-0.072 |
|
-0.035 |
-0.047 |
|
|
(0.058) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.075) |
(0.077) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.019 |
-0.020 |
|
-0.024 |
-0.029 |
|
-0.011 |
-0.015 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.021) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.023) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.061 |
-0.069 |
|
-0.123 |
-0.141 |
|
-0.189 |
-0.180 |
|
|
(0.097) |
(0.101) |
|
(0.107) |
(0.109) |
|
(0.130) |
(0.139) |
| SC quota |
|
0.137 |
0.134 |
|
0.200+ |
0.187 |
|
0.112 |
0.112 |
|
|
(0.102) |
(0.103) |
|
(0.117) |
(0.116) |
|
(0.150) |
(0.152) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.048 |
-0.054 |
|
-0.111 |
-0.103 |
|
-0.027 |
-0.039 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.079) |
|
(0.086) |
(0.091) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.339 |
0.367 |
|
0.532** |
0.498+ |
|
0.260 |
0.288 |
|
|
(0.255) |
(0.252) |
|
(0.168) |
(0.262) |
|
(0.296) |
(0.283) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.003* |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.003) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.057 |
|
|
0.057 |
|
|
0.068 |
|
|
|
(0.053) |
|
|
(0.064) |
|
|
(0.066) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.175** |
0.177** |
0.197** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.068) |
(0.069) |
|
|
|
| T1:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
-0.102 |
-0.071 |
-0.117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.119) |
(0.129) |
(0.130) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.117+ |
0.117+ |
0.124+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.070) |
(0.073) |
| T2:Sarpanch SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.021 |
0.105 |
0.119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.118) |
(0.126) |
(0.128) |
| Num.Obs. |
489 |
447 |
433 |
323 |
295 |
287 |
323 |
294 |
284 |
| R2 |
0.017 |
0.056 |
0.065 |
0.023 |
0.093 |
0.119 |
0.020 |
0.068 |
0.077 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP4 (H3.15b) table, Sarpanch pre- and collective group preferences, average difference; Gram sevak female
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
23.484*** |
22.827*** |
27.750*** |
23.484*** |
23.329*** |
29.464*** |
23.484*** |
22.731*** |
26.482*** |
|
(1.118) |
(2.293) |
(3.044) |
(1.118) |
(2.530) |
(3.315) |
(1.118) |
(2.811) |
(3.912) |
| Discussion rules |
-2.423+ |
-3.137* |
-3.564* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.396) |
(1.476) |
(1.534) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gramsevak_female |
-2.524 |
-3.113+ |
-3.227+ |
-2.524 |
-3.236+ |
-3.151+ |
-2.524 |
-3.045+ |
-3.401+ |
|
(1.692) |
(1.802) |
(1.842) |
(1.692) |
(1.816) |
(1.855) |
(1.692) |
(1.827) |
(1.881) |
| Discussion rules:gramsevak_female |
0.820 |
2.180 |
2.243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.106) |
(2.224) |
(2.289) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
7.947* |
5.746+ |
|
7.649* |
5.608+ |
|
8.344+ |
6.538 |
|
|
(3.240) |
(3.352) |
|
(3.319) |
(3.336) |
|
(4.361) |
(4.674) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.689 |
-0.551 |
|
-1.206 |
-4.459 |
|
2.336 |
1.105 |
|
|
(6.367) |
(6.679) |
|
(10.188) |
(10.727) |
|
(7.318) |
(7.449) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
2.301 |
1.822 |
|
-0.891 |
-0.724 |
|
4.863 |
4.273 |
|
|
(2.405) |
(2.474) |
|
(2.945) |
(3.038) |
|
(3.232) |
(3.160) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-0.606 |
-0.479 |
|
-3.895* |
-2.722 |
|
1.431 |
1.177 |
|
|
(1.536) |
(1.625) |
|
(1.773) |
(1.864) |
|
(1.909) |
(2.089) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.706 |
-1.602 |
|
-2.759* |
-3.676** |
|
1.111 |
0.522 |
|
|
(1.113) |
(1.139) |
|
(1.326) |
(1.341) |
|
(1.374) |
(1.416) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-0.968 |
-1.491 |
|
1.208 |
0.493 |
|
-2.445+ |
-3.002* |
|
|
(1.075) |
(1.117) |
|
(1.273) |
(1.322) |
|
(1.302) |
(1.373) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-4.068 |
-3.083 |
|
-2.770 |
-2.933 |
|
-4.577 |
-2.542 |
|
|
(2.942) |
(2.932) |
|
(2.927) |
(2.736) |
|
(3.953) |
(4.105) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
0.207 |
1.123 |
|
1.628 |
2.075 |
|
-1.117 |
-0.160 |
|
|
(1.208) |
(1.267) |
|
(1.413) |
(1.473) |
|
(1.480) |
(1.579) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.049 |
-0.143 |
|
-0.296 |
-0.324 |
|
-0.066 |
-0.349 |
|
|
(0.370) |
(0.394) |
|
(0.448) |
(0.473) |
|
(0.451) |
(0.491) |
| Gender quota |
|
-1.395 |
0.155 |
|
-1.646 |
0.313 |
|
-0.584 |
-0.235 |
|
|
(1.694) |
(1.918) |
|
(1.975) |
(2.175) |
|
(2.096) |
(2.484) |
| SC quota |
|
-0.821 |
-1.426 |
|
0.915 |
0.288 |
|
-2.581 |
-3.117 |
|
|
(2.414) |
(2.485) |
|
(2.953) |
(3.061) |
|
(3.255) |
(3.184) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.491 |
-0.203 |
|
1.303 |
1.055 |
|
-1.853 |
-1.369 |
|
|
(1.540) |
(1.618) |
|
(1.778) |
(1.858) |
|
(1.912) |
(2.070) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-4.530 |
-4.067 |
|
0.393 |
2.440 |
|
-5.977 |
-4.525 |
|
|
(6.745) |
(7.077) |
|
(10.472) |
(10.989) |
|
(7.951) |
(8.094) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.078** |
|
|
-0.100*** |
|
|
-0.068* |
|
|
|
(0.027) |
|
|
(0.030) |
|
|
(0.034) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.065 |
|
|
0.084 |
|
|
0.074 |
|
|
|
(0.046) |
|
|
(0.055) |
|
|
(0.065) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.063 |
|
|
-0.636 |
|
|
0.838 |
|
|
|
(1.202) |
|
|
(1.421) |
|
|
(1.504) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-2.877+ |
-3.220+ |
-3.742* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.585) |
(1.672) |
(1.756) |
|
|
|
| T1:gramsevak_female |
|
|
|
-0.687 |
0.554 |
0.131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.413) |
(2.516) |
(2.585) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1.923 |
-2.643 |
-3.159+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.679) |
(1.789) |
(1.898) |
| T2:gramsevak_female |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.326 |
4.060 |
4.378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.481) |
(2.652) |
(2.790) |
| Num.Obs. |
583 |
528 |
487 |
389 |
353 |
324 |
376 |
338 |
314 |
| R2 |
0.013 |
0.048 |
0.072 |
0.033 |
0.096 |
0.134 |
0.007 |
0.069 |
0.088 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP4 (H3.15b) table, Sarpanch pre- priority and collective group preference percentage difference; Gram sevak female
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
48.905*** |
43.223*** |
61.661*** |
48.905*** |
47.094*** |
66.422*** |
48.905*** |
39.293*** |
55.313*** |
|
(3.067) |
(6.399) |
(8.727) |
(3.067) |
(7.215) |
(9.804) |
(3.067) |
(7.816) |
(10.978) |
| Discussion rules |
-2.134 |
-4.827 |
-6.772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.844) |
(4.036) |
(4.127) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gramsevak_female |
-1.850 |
-3.206 |
-2.801 |
-1.850 |
-3.576 |
-2.830 |
-1.850 |
-2.859 |
-3.339 |
|
(4.758) |
(5.042) |
(5.090) |
(4.758) |
(5.141) |
(5.193) |
(4.758) |
(5.049) |
(5.102) |
| Discussion rules:gramsevak_female |
-1.572 |
2.537 |
2.732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.878) |
(6.196) |
(6.335) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
24.774** |
18.611+ |
|
23.409* |
18.008+ |
|
26.703* |
20.733 |
|
|
(9.297) |
(9.623) |
|
(10.658) |
(10.793) |
|
(12.127) |
(12.639) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
2.284 |
-2.531 |
|
-6.135 |
-15.767 |
|
0.428 |
-4.098 |
|
|
(15.038) |
(17.034) |
|
(21.711) |
(24.726) |
|
(17.821) |
(19.423) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
0.999 |
-0.429 |
|
-10.945 |
-11.047 |
|
12.811 |
11.220 |
|
|
(6.284) |
(6.425) |
|
(7.433) |
(7.610) |
|
(8.461) |
(8.251) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
-1.333 |
-1.023 |
|
-11.813* |
-9.347+ |
|
8.240 |
7.802 |
|
|
(4.120) |
(4.398) |
|
(4.850) |
(5.085) |
|
(5.111) |
(5.623) |
| Education above median |
|
-0.519 |
-3.011 |
|
-3.414 |
-6.264+ |
|
4.059 |
2.948 |
|
|
(3.033) |
(3.096) |
|
(3.666) |
(3.723) |
|
(3.688) |
(3.742) |
| Wealth above median |
|
-2.258 |
-3.813 |
|
2.848 |
1.126 |
|
-6.390+ |
-8.796* |
|
|
(3.013) |
(3.126) |
|
(3.600) |
(3.747) |
|
(3.618) |
(3.734) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-8.794 |
-6.108 |
|
-5.324 |
-5.885 |
|
-10.484 |
-4.270 |
|
|
(8.534) |
(8.340) |
|
(9.727) |
(9.176) |
|
(11.065) |
(10.932) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
1.239 |
3.200 |
|
2.366 |
3.362 |
|
0.053 |
1.896 |
|
|
(3.325) |
(3.516) |
|
(3.983) |
(4.189) |
|
(4.132) |
(4.400) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
0.517 |
0.201 |
|
-0.474 |
-0.329 |
|
0.267 |
-0.373 |
|
|
(1.001) |
(1.065) |
|
(1.229) |
(1.302) |
|
(1.205) |
(1.313) |
| Gender quota |
|
-9.154+ |
-5.325 |
|
-10.449+ |
-5.739 |
|
-7.451 |
-6.013 |
|
|
(4.770) |
(5.460) |
|
(5.529) |
(6.213) |
|
(5.910) |
(6.891) |
| SC quota |
|
5.593 |
4.228 |
|
11.835 |
11.140 |
|
-0.063 |
-2.618 |
|
|
(6.212) |
(6.353) |
|
(7.369) |
(7.582) |
|
(8.431) |
(8.201) |
| OBC quota |
|
0.468 |
0.823 |
|
5.707 |
5.095 |
|
-4.498 |
-4.535 |
|
|
(4.100) |
(4.383) |
|
(4.678) |
(4.913) |
|
(5.101) |
(5.561) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
-10.857 |
-7.972 |
|
5.903 |
13.228 |
|
-5.914 |
-0.864 |
|
|
(16.272) |
(18.176) |
|
(22.801) |
(25.649) |
|
(19.973) |
(21.296) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
-0.295*** |
|
|
-0.308*** |
|
|
-0.290** |
|
|
|
(0.072) |
|
|
(0.087) |
|
|
(0.089) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.184 |
|
|
0.173 |
|
|
0.266 |
|
|
|
(0.129) |
|
|
(0.155) |
|
|
(0.178) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.845 |
|
|
-0.014 |
|
|
3.477 |
|
|
|
(3.306) |
|
|
(3.945) |
|
|
(4.135) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
-4.703 |
-6.557 |
-8.870+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.369) |
(4.547) |
(4.713) |
|
|
|
| T1:gramsevak_female |
|
|
|
-1.587 |
2.018 |
1.801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.796) |
(7.103) |
(7.277) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.697 |
-2.610 |
-4.426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.622) |
(4.926) |
(5.098) |
| T2:gramsevak_female |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1.819 |
4.262 |
4.688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.847) |
(7.255) |
(7.546) |
| Num.Obs. |
594 |
538 |
498 |
397 |
360 |
332 |
386 |
347 |
323 |
| R2 |
0.004 |
0.042 |
0.074 |
0.008 |
0.072 |
0.104 |
0.002 |
0.068 |
0.107 |
| |
Impact of T1/T2 combined |
Impact of T1 |
Impact of T2 |
CP4 (H3.15b) table, Sarpanch pre- priority and collective priority same; Gram sevak female
| |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted, demographic controls |
Adjusted, demographic and village controls |
| + p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 |
| Each model is a linear regression of each outcome on an indicator for being assigned to the relevant treatment condition(s) versus not. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted models presented. All regressions use robust standard errors. |
| (Intercept) |
0.326*** |
0.320** |
0.218 |
0.326*** |
0.348** |
0.103 |
0.326*** |
0.277* |
0.220 |
|
(0.049) |
(0.101) |
(0.133) |
(0.049) |
(0.114) |
(0.160) |
(0.049) |
(0.125) |
(0.176) |
| Discussion rules |
0.149* |
0.168* |
0.163* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.062) |
(0.065) |
(0.066) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gramsevak_female |
0.105 |
0.133 |
0.123 |
0.105 |
0.129 |
0.108 |
0.105 |
0.125 |
0.124 |
|
(0.079) |
(0.082) |
(0.083) |
(0.079) |
(0.083) |
(0.083) |
(0.079) |
(0.084) |
(0.085) |
| Discussion rules:gramsevak_female |
-0.040 |
-0.043 |
-0.017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.096) |
(0.101) |
(0.102) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarpanch woman |
|
0.178 |
0.182 |
|
0.182 |
0.200 |
|
0.253 |
0.248 |
|
|
(0.167) |
(0.169) |
|
(0.191) |
(0.186) |
|
(0.223) |
(0.229) |
| Sarpanch relative present |
|
-0.203 |
-0.206 |
|
-0.290** |
-0.197 |
|
-0.241 |
-0.257 |
|
|
(0.221) |
(0.219) |
|
(0.098) |
(0.201) |
|
(0.238) |
(0.228) |
| Sarpanch SC |
|
-0.080 |
-0.064 |
|
-0.198 |
-0.177 |
|
-0.009 |
0.014 |
|
|
(0.106) |
(0.107) |
|
(0.120) |
(0.121) |
|
(0.156) |
(0.154) |
| Sarpanch OBC |
|
0.080 |
0.089 |
|
0.098 |
0.089 |
|
0.074 |
0.080 |
|
|
(0.067) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.079) |
(0.082) |
|
(0.085) |
(0.091) |
| Education above median |
|
0.001 |
0.016 |
|
0.077 |
0.092 |
|
-0.041 |
-0.031 |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.060) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.061) |
(0.063) |
| Wealth above median |
|
0.085+ |
0.070 |
|
0.064 |
0.065 |
|
0.125* |
0.107+ |
|
|
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
|
(0.058) |
(0.061) |
|
(0.059) |
(0.060) |
| Lives with in-laws |
|
-0.241+ |
-0.236+ |
|
-0.186 |
-0.181 |
|
-0.202 |
-0.211 |
|
|
(0.141) |
(0.141) |
|
(0.169) |
(0.160) |
|
(0.184) |
(0.187) |
| Lives with own parents |
|
-0.024 |
-0.040 |
|
-0.046 |
-0.061 |
|
-0.020 |
-0.034 |
|
|
(0.058) |
(0.059) |
|
(0.069) |
(0.069) |
|
(0.074) |
(0.076) |
| Years as sarpanch |
|
-0.022 |
-0.023 |
|
-0.028 |
-0.033 |
|
-0.013 |
-0.018 |
|
|
(0.016) |
(0.018) |
|
(0.020) |
(0.022) |
|
(0.021) |
(0.024) |
| Gender quota |
|
-0.042 |
-0.052 |
|
-0.106 |
-0.123 |
|
-0.168 |
-0.159 |
|
|
(0.097) |
(0.100) |
|
(0.106) |
(0.110) |
|
(0.127) |
(0.134) |
| SC quota |
|
0.161 |
0.162 |
|
0.225+ |
0.219+ |
|
0.159 |
0.162 |
|
|
(0.102) |
(0.102) |
|
(0.115) |
(0.114) |
|
(0.151) |
(0.152) |
| OBC quota |
|
-0.040 |
-0.045 |
|
-0.108 |
-0.097 |
|
-0.017 |
-0.033 |
|
|
(0.066) |
(0.067) |
|
(0.077) |
(0.078) |
|
(0.084) |
(0.088) |
| Sarpanch woman:Sarpanch relative present |
|
0.335 |
0.375 |
|
0.460** |
0.430+ |
|
0.307 |
0.352 |
|
|
(0.248) |
(0.245) |
|
(0.165) |
(0.239) |
|
(0.278) |
(0.267) |
| Percent of village land held by biggest landholding caste |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.003* |
|
|
0.002 |
|
|
|
(0.001) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.001) |
| Distance (km) from block center |
|
|
0.000 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
-0.003 |
|
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.002) |
|
|
(0.003) |
| Directly elected |
|
|
0.060 |
|
|
0.060 |
|
|
0.066 |
|
|
|
(0.053) |
|
|
(0.064) |
|
|
(0.066) |
| T1 |
|
|
|
0.184** |
0.212** |
0.201** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.071) |
(0.076) |
(0.076) |
|
|
|
| T1:gramsevak_female |
|
|
|
-0.094 |
-0.123 |
-0.078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.112) |
(0.116) |
(0.117) |
|
|
|
| T2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.111 |
0.111 |
0.112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.073) |
(0.078) |
(0.081) |
| T2:gramsevak_female |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.015 |
0.056 |
0.082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.111) |
(0.118) |
(0.119) |
| Num.Obs. |
490 |
447 |
433 |
324 |
295 |
287 |
323 |
294 |
284 |
| R2 |
0.022 |
0.066 |
0.076 |
0.027 |
0.100 |
0.122 |
0.029 |
0.089 |
0.101 |